Author Archives: Michael Froomkin

Today’s Robocall (Coral Gables Commission Group 4)

Somebody’s voice identifying the owner as something like “Maria Nicholas” (I think that’s what it sounded like) just robocalled me and urged me to vote for Gonzalo Sanabria in the Coral Gables County Commission race because he is the only registered Republican in the Group 4 race. It called him a “good Republican” and said he do the sort of things they do — slash budgets and the like. (It was a short call and went by too fast for me to try to take any near-verbatim notes.)

Needless to say, the association of Sanabria with the Governor of Florida did not make me more likely to vote for Sanabria, rather the reverse. And it’s worse than that: I had no idea Sanabria was the only Republican in the nonpartisan race. After all, several of the other candidates, including Quesada, are sounding pretty Republican to me.

The call did not say it was paid for by the Sanabria campaign, in fact it did not identify who paid for it at all. I don’t have caller ID on my land line so I can’t identify the source that way either. (If anyone who does gets this call, please let us know.) Unless this is a false flag operation, someone is not spending their money at all wisely: if they can figure out that I live in the Gables from the voter records, it shouldn’t be that hard to look up the fact that I’m registered as a Democrat and correlate that with my phone number.

Does anyone know who “Maria Nicholas” or the like might be? Is she a local GOP bigwig? Also, do independent political expenditures (if that’s what paid for this) in a municipal election have any legal obligation to ID the source when doing robocalls? I know they would have that obligation in a federal election, but I don’t know the relevant state/local law.

Posted in Coral Gables | 3 Comments

Coral Gables Candidate Debate: Part 1 – Commission Group 4 and Group 5 (Updated)

I went to the Coral Gables candidates’ debate this evening, sponsored by the Coral Gables Chamber of Commerce. I walked in genuinely undecided about all the races, and in some cases pretty uninformed. I walked out knowing there was no choice in Group 5, and I think I may have figured out who to vote for in the Mayor’s race, but I remain undecided in Group 4. Today I’ll write about the Commission debate. I’ll try to post my account of the Mayor’s race debate tomorrow.

Continue reading

Posted in Coral Gables | 31 Comments

Free Drinks! (Repost)

All you have to do is listen to a lecture first, starting at 5:30 on Monday, April 4, at the Lowe Art Museum. RSVP by March 30th — that’s tomorrow — to events@law.miami.edu.
Continue reading

Posted in Personal, Talks & Conferences, U.Miami | 2 Comments

I Think He’s Shrill

There is no state, no nation, no planet, and no universe where it should be legal to pay off a Legislature directly.

There is no government in which a sworn lawmaker should be able to take unlimited payoffs from those seeking favorable treatment.

And yet this is now precisely the law of Florida.

In Sunday’s column I called the Florida Legislature "the Whore of Babylon" for passing a law last week that legalizes its own bribery.

It is now legal in Florida for the leaders of our House and Senate, of both the Republican and Democratic parties, to operate what are laughably called “leadership funds.”

If you are an interest group in Florida, a corporation, a lobbyist seeking favor, you go to these “leadership” funds run by lawmakers …

And you pay them.

— Howard Troxler, St. Petersburg Times, Let's say it again: They are for sale . (Spotted via the Buzz)

So it turns out it’s not just Florida’s Governor who can turn people into slavering wrecks, it’s the legislature too. And although these votes were dominated by the GOP, they were also plenty of Democrats going along with it all. Actually, I mis-read the vote: it was a party-line vote. This is a GOP production all the way.

Posted in Florida | 1 Comment

Value of Parachutes Subjected to Meta-Analysis

Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials by Smith and Pell at 327BMJ 1459 (18 December 2003)

Of course this study is eight years old, so it is possible that someone has gotten a grant to plug this hole in our knowledge.

(spotted via David Gray)

PS For a second there I thought this would be about golden parachutes, but no such luck.

Posted in Completely Different | 1 Comment

Bill Cronon Blogs About the Attack on Academic Freedom in Wisconsin

The author of The Changes in the Land, the path-breaking book on early American environmental history blogs about the why everyone should be concerned about McCarthyist (yes, McCarthyist) tactics being employed in Wisconsin (yes, ironically, in Wisconsin) by the the state Republican party.

See Abusing Open Records to Attack Academic Freedom | Scholar as Citizen for the details.

Posted in Politics: The Party of Sleaze | Comments Off on Bill Cronon Blogs About the Attack on Academic Freedom in Wisconsin