Monthly Archives: October 2004

My Ballot Was Delivered

As I'm returning too late next Tuesday to vote, I voted absentee. It's a very long ballot, with many constitutional amendments (most, but not all, bad ones) and bond issues (hard choices – they lump good projects with bad ones to make several choices very debatable); I predict very long lines at the polls. I paid extra to have the ballot “tracked” when I mailed it, and the USPS gave me tracking number 0302 0980 0000 2813 9838. According to the USPS web site,

Your item was delivered at 12:13 pm on October 26, 2004 in MIAMI, FL 33102.

That doesn't prove they will count it of course.

Posted in Personal | 4 Comments

The Power of Belief

Belief, faith, call it what you will, it can be a powerful thing. Indeed, this powerful confession of belief by Thomas Schaller, Executive Editor of the Gadflyer, explains in a fashion even I can understand Why I Believe in Our President. Yes, there's much to ponder there.

Posted in Politics: US: 2004 Election | 3 Comments

The Meat Market Beckons

Tonight I leave for a week in the UK, a trip that will mix busineess with pleasure. My plan is to look up old friends in London and Cambridge as well as do the work that brings me there.

When I get back to Miami, I get almost two days to reorganize myself and then it's off to the AALS 'meat market' — the annual law professor hiring fair. It's only my second time there, and my first as a buyer rather than attending as a seller.

Michael Madison has a nice post on his blog about the Meat Market, which links to other helpful accounts aimed at sellers. Now if only someone would write helpful tips for neophyte buyers…

Posted in Talks & Conferences | 5 Comments

It Hurts Even When I Laugh

Joke circulating via e-mail:

Q: What's the difference between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War?

Continue reading

Posted in Completely Different | 1 Comment

Play Supreme Court Survivor

Anupam Chander (who is both a blogger and Professor of Law at the University of California, Davis, School of Law) and JD student Ryan Walters have designed a little web site they call the Supreme Court Survivor game. Their objective is “to highlight the importance of the 2004 presidential election to the preservation of civil liberties in this country.”

Anupam, a charming person whom I met at a conference not so long ago, wrote me a nice note asking me to publicize it, so here it is.

There's no doubt that the next President will shape the court for a long time: there are liberal, conservative and fence-sitting Justices who are likely to retire. But, cute as it is, I have to wonder whether this game is entirely in good taste, and if as a pure tactical matter it's the best tool to raise consciousness about this critical issue. It seems to me that there's some danger it might backfire given the Chief Justice's coincidental illness.

Meanwhile, if there's an easter egg in there, I can't find it.

Update: When you tire of that one, and still want a political online game, you can play Enjoy the Draft's Spring Break Fallujah: The Game. I am still stuck on the first level, myself.

Posted in Law: Everything Else | 2 Comments

He Has Incentive

Sharp-eyed Eric Muller notices something strange:

A Full and Appropriately Speedy Recovery

I wish Chief Justice Rehnquist a full and speedy recovery.

On the subject of “speedy,” though, I find it curious that the Court is already telling us that he'll be back at work next Monday, about 8 days after his tracheotomy. Not only is it hard to imagine how anyone could know how the Chief will actually be feeling by next Monday, but the ordinary recovery period for a case without special risk factors or complications is two weeks. And there are reasons to suspect that the Chief's is not an entirely ordinary case. Plus he's 80 years old.

Odd, that.

4-4 on 11-02-04?

Not if this Chief can help it. Then-Justice Rehnquist, it may be recalled, was the author of an opinion, Laird, Secretary of Defense v. Tatum, 409 U.S. 824, 837 (1972) (Rehnquist, J., mem.), explaining his non-recusal despite his personal involvement in some of the matters at issue, on the grounds that Justices should be less willing to recuse themselves on the grounds of conflict of interest if the case is really important — precisely the sort of cases where others might ordinarily think recusal was most called for….

At least his doctors may be pleased that their patient has a powerful incentive to get better quickly.

Posted in Law: Everything Else | Comments Off on He Has Incentive