Author Archives: Michael Froomkin

UM Law Review Symposium on the Death Penalty

With all our recent hires in the criminal law area, the law school is turning into something of a crim law powerhouse. So it’s appropriate that this year’s Law Review Symposium will be on the death penalty and life without parole. The Symposium will be held on the afternoon of Friday, February 17 and the morning of Saturday, February 18. Topics include:

  • whether the death penalty is near its end in the United States;
  • the debate over new lethal injection protocols;
  • the debate about life without parole as an alternative to the death penalty, and
  • the role of social science in examining the death penalty.

The keynote speaker will be Jordan Steiker of the University of Texas Law School.

Panelists will include Deborah Denno of Fordham, Robert Blecker of New York Law School, Mona Lynch of the University of California at Irvine, Corinna Lain of the University of Richmond, Adam Kolber of Brooklyn Law School, Douglas Berman of Ohio State, Cynthia Brown of the University of Central Florida, Ashley Nellis of The Sentencing Project, and University of Miami law professors Susan Bandes, Mary Anne Franks, Tamara Lave, and Sarah Mourer.

This is a good list of speakers — should be a great event for people interested in the topic.

For more information, or to register in advance, you can contact Farah Barquero or call (305) 284-2464.

Posted in Law: Criminal Law, Talks & Conferences | Comments Off on UM Law Review Symposium on the Death Penalty

The Stephen Colbert Phenomenon

It began with ‘I am a Super PAC and So Can You’. Then Colbert turned over his Super PAC to Jon Stewart in order to enable the creation of a Presidential exploratory committee … and then Colbert was interviewed on ABC’s This Week about his Presidential ambitions by no less than George Stephanopoulos.

Colbert chewed him up and spit him out.

The Super PAC has hit the ground running. It began its new independent-from-Colbert incarnation with this instant classic advertisement, Mitt Romney (Serial Killer):

Then they went after Newt Gingrich in Double Negative:

And now he’s released the totally unrelated Super PAC has released this latest Herman Cainiod jem:

In addition to these acts of national conscious-raising, Colbert has already forced Huntsman from the race. Huntsman withdrew when polling showed Colbert running ahead of Huntsman in South Carolina.

But wait. Do you think a comedian should not be messing with the important business of picking a GOP candidate? Not to worry, the Colbert Super PAC agrees, and is running an anti-Colbert commercial too:

Posted in 2012 Election | Comments Off on The Stephen Colbert Phenomenon

Message From the Dark

David Weinberger on what we learn from yesterday’s Internet blackout activism:

Fourth, there’s a growing “we” on the Internet. It is not as inclusive as we think, it’s far more diverse than we imagine, and it’s far less egalitarian than we should demanand. But so was tbe “we” in “We the People.” The individual acts of darkness declared are the start of the We we need to nurture.

The other three aren’t bad either.

Joho the Blog » Four messages from the dark.

Posted in Civil Liberties | Comments Off on Message From the Dark

Groundhog Day?

The site seems to be serving up the Dec. 24, 2010 version of itself. But only sometimes.

I can only presume this has something to do with a cache problem of some sort.

Unfortunately, I have a very busy day – a radio interview with David Levine of Hearsay Culture that will air soon on KZSU and then I’m on panel that is part of our Diversity Week program, in which I will take the unpopular position that cyber-bullying laws are (1) heavily constrained by the First Amendment and (2) bad policy — better to regulate “bullying” to whatever extent one can, and have a rule that includes ‘cyber’ behavior to the same extent as telephoned, faxed, and typewritten speech. And, of course, meetings.

So it may be a while before I can get to the bottom of this.

Posted in Discourse.net, Talks & Conferences | Comments Off on Groundhog Day?

Research Assistant Wanted (Spring 2012)

I would like to hire a 2L or 3L to be my research assistant for 10-15 hours/week during the coming semester.

The work primarily involves assisting me with legal research relating to papers I am writing on privacy and on Internet regulation.

I need someone who can write clearly and is well-organized. If you happen to have some web or programming skills (some or all of WordPress, HTML, MySQL, Perl, Debian), that would be a plus but it is not in any way a requirement.

The pay of $13 / hr is set by the university, and is not as high as you deserve, but the work is sometimes interesting.

If this sounds attractive, please e-mail me the following with the subject line RESEARCH ASSISTANT 2012 (in all caps), followed by your name:

  1. A note telling me
    • How many hours you’d ideally like to work per week
    • When you are free to start.
    • Your phone number and email address.
  2. A copy of your resume (c.v.).
  3. A transcript of your grades (need not be an official copy).
  4. If you have one handy, also attach a short NON-legal writing sample. If you have none, I’ll accept a legal writing sample (whatever you do, though, please don’t send your L-Comm/LRW memo).
Posted in Law School | Comments Off on Research Assistant Wanted (Spring 2012)

Newt Is Even Worse Than You Think

I missed this TPM article on Newt Gingrich’s second wife published back in 2010. He’s not just a serial abandoner of sick wives who dumps them while they hospitalized. It’s so much more.

(Via TPM, The Marianne Bomb Goes Off?)

Posted in Politics: The Party of Sleaze | 2 Comments