Author Archives: Michael Froomkin

Robot Uprisings. It’s Only a Matter of Time.

It’s good to have Bruce Schneier worrying about the big questions for us. The world is undoubtedly a safer place thanks to his work on crypto and security. And he’s funny too. In Schneier on Security: How to Survive a Robot Uprising he points us to this “good start” on the problem:

i’m reading about how to survive a robot uprising. i’m not gonna give away all the secrets, but i’ll share a few…

  • choose a complex environment. waterfalls, street traffic, and places with lots of ambient noise confuse the robots.
  • lose your heat signature. smear yourself with mud and leaves and sit real still.
  • use uncommon words to suss out robots on the phone. robots do not know how pronounce supercalifragilisticexpealidocious.
  • find a blunt weapon. serrated edges won’t work on robo exo-skeletons. nope.
  • alter your stride. robots can judge gait and injury, even height and intention, by stride, so put some rocks in your shoes and mix things up a bit. doing some ministry of silly walks stuff goes even further towards confusing them.
  • pretend that everything is normal. to forstall a mechanized killing spree, you must pretend that nothing is amiss.

If they are Daleks, I thought you just find something with a lot of stairs and no elevator. But the Wikipedia entry on Daleks suggests I’m behind the times,

Due to their gliding motion Daleks were notoriously unable to tackle stairs, which made them easy to overcome under the right circumstances. An oft-copied cartoon from Punch pictured a group of Daleks at the foot of a flight of stairs with the caption, “This certainly buggers our plan to conquer the Universe”. In a scene from the serial Destiny of the Daleks, the Doctor and companions escape from Dalek pursuers by climbing into a ceiling duct. The Doctor (Tom Baker) calls down, “If you’re supposed to be the superior race of the universe, why don’t you try climbing after us? Bye bye!” The Daleks generally make up for their lack of mobility with overwhelming firepower. A joke around science fiction conventions went, “Real Daleks don’t climb stairs; they level the building.”

In The Dalek Invasion of Earth (1964) a Dalek emerges from the waters of the River Thames, indicating that they are amphibious to a degree. Remembrance of the Daleks (1988) showed that they can hover using a sort of limited antigravity — first implied in earlier serials such as The Chase (1965) and Revelation of the Daleks (1985) — but their awkward forms still limit their mobility in tight quarters. Despite this, the Daleks’ supposed inability to climb stairs is still frequently referred to for humorous effect by journalists covering the series.

The 2005 series episodes Dalek and The Parting of the Ways featured Daleks hovering and flying, the latter also showing them flying through the vacuum of space. In the Dalek episode, the Dalek said “Elevate” before hovering, in the same way it would say “Exterminate” before exterminating.

And is this a good time to link to Charles Stross’s free e-book, Accelerando? Could there be a bad time?

Posted in Completely Different | 1 Comment

It Quacks Like a Duck

Peter Jung tipped me off to ABC News: EXCLUSIVE: Supreme Ethics Problem?:

At the historic swearing-in of John Roberts as the 17th chief justice of the United States last September, every member of the Supreme Court, except Antonin Scalia, was in attendance. ABC News has learned that Scalia instead was on the tennis court at one of the country’s top resorts, the Ritz-Carlton hotel in Bachelor Gulch, Colo., during a trip to a legal seminar sponsored by the Federalist Society.

“I was out of town with a commitment that I could not break, and that’s what the public information office told you,” he said.

It “doesn’t matter what it was. It was a commitment that I couldn’t break,” Scalia continued when questioned further.

According to the event’s invitation, obtained by ABC News, the Federalist Society promised members who attended the seminar an exclusive and “rare opportunity to spend time, both socially and intellectually” with Scalia.

Update: Then again, maybe it’s not a duck?

Posted in Law: Ethics, Law: The Supremes | 2 Comments

Busy Week

Everyone wants to be in Miami when the weather is good.

  • Today, John Bruton, European Union ambassador to the United States, will speak at the law school on “The European Union Today: Consequences of the Constitutional impasse and Relations with the United States.” From what I gather it’s going to be popular–probably standing room only.
  • Tomorrow, Professor Jan Paulsson, the international arbitrator who is visiting the Law School this semester, will give an LL.M seminar on “Law and Sports in the International Arena,” which I presume will be about the IOC and other sports bodies’ athletic controversies over alleged doping by athletes.
  • Thursday, Justice Stephen G. Breyer will deliver the Cole Lecture at UM Law School. I don’t think it’s open to the public without a ticket — the faculty had to RSVP to get seats and students had to enter a lottery to get tickets. [Update: it looks like this last part is wrong — see the comments.]
Posted in Law School | 4 Comments

Dan Froomkin Column Revives Today

My brother’s paternity leave from the Post is over, and his column resumes later today, undoubtedly pleasing thousands of his rabid and Dan-deprived fans.

Posted in Dan Froomkin | 1 Comment

Size Matters. So Does Energy

One of the nice things about being at the University of Miami law school these days is that the faculty is actually somewhat cheerful. Last semester wasn’t much fun, with Wilma and everything, but that’s the past. And the weather is great now too.

Another cheerful thing about the place is that the University itself seems to be poised for good things. We have a new Provost who came and spoke to us a few weeks ago and said a large number of sensible and welcome things. (And one at best arguably sensible and certainly not welcome thing: he intends to be guided heavily by quantitative metrics in evaluating the various schools. So he wants us to identify stuff he can count to see how we stack up against peer institutions. But I digress.)

And certainly a good chunk of the credit for University advancement and general optimism must go to our local dynamo, University President Donna Shalala. While projecting seriousness, she’s also doing a huge capital campaign. She’s hired a pretty strong team (see above). She’s mostly left the law school alone (another smart move). She has a relentless publicity streak, but it’s harnessed in the service of the University: She’s in the paper all the time. Has her name on a regular column in the local section. And she’s a good advertisement for the place.

And did I mention President Shalala’s a sports nut? That counts a lot around here too. And now it seems she’s also got a nice sense of humor, as you can see from this picture which ran as an ad in today’s paper (click for a much bigger image).

Posted in U.Miami | 1 Comment

A Sign of the Times

Today I received an email request from a person who described herself as “the human resources manager for a mid-sized law firm in downtown Miami.” She named the firm, but I’m not going to. She wondered if I might have information on “finding quality legal staff candidates from universities in India (i.e., paralegals, legal assistants, word processors, etc.)”. Or maybe I know “the best universities in India producing good candidates for these types of position”

In short, she’d like me to help her figure out how to outsource local jobs to India.

I Don’t Think So, thank you.

However, in what is undoubtedly a sign of advancing age and who knows maybe even incipient maturity, I have deleted each of the replies which have come to mind, and thus have yet to email a reply. (Yes, I know this contradicts my previous post on giving offense.)

Posted in Econ & Money | 3 Comments