Author Archives: Michael Froomkin

Chief Justice Roberts Makes Tactical Foray Into Partisan Politics?

Perhaps I'm just in a grumpy mood but I was somewhat taken aback by the Chief Justice's statements as reported in the New York Times's Sidebar – Judging the Merits of a Supreme Court Drawn Only From the Judiciary.

For the first time in its history, every member of the United States Supreme Court is a former federal appeals court judge. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., in a lively and surprising talk a couple of weeks ago, said that development might be a good thing.

Even the Times found that too much to swallow.

But there are reasons to question the chief justice’s conclusions.

The political scientists who study such things say there is no empirical support for the notion that former judges are more apt to feel constrained by earlier rulings or to suppress their political views. “Former appellate court judges are no more likely to follow precedent or to put aside their policy preferences than are justices lacking judicial experience,” according to a study to be published soon in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review.

It seems to me that this (empirically unsupported) claim that appellate judges are “less political” (and thus, presumably, “better”) is a remarkably partisan remark coming from the Chief Justice when it does. Who are the youngish appellate judges who might be appointed to the Supreme Court today? Why, it just happens that at present they just happen to be … wait for it … pretty much entirely a group of very-conservative to ultra-conservative appointees put on the bench by George W. Bush. Were President Obama to have to make an appointment in the near term, and were his goal to be to appoint a youngish non-conservative, the intersection of that set with sitting judges on the Courts of Appeal is approximately zero.

It is hard to see how this convenient fact could have been lost on someone as smart as the Chief Justice. In which case, I find a not-very-hidden agenda in his remarks: that of giving aid and comfort to any GOP attempt to block a non-judicial liberal from being put on the Court. And believe me, that's very much on the mind of the right-wing establishment. I would like to be wrong about this; I had hoped for better from him.

Posted in Law: The Supremes | 3 Comments

We Get Email (Lingerie Ads Dept.)

I get all sorts of strange email. Recently the volume of email asking what I'd charge to run an ad, or sell “sponsorship” has gone up from every-so-often to several per week.

Today's was a little odder than usual:

Hello Michael,

My name is Alex [surname] and I am the manager of the project for [erotic lingerie web site].
And I would like to buy the text link advertisement on your blog https://www.discourse.net for my website [erotic lingerie web site]. Can you send me the monthly rates for the blog-wide text link on your blog ?
I would appreciate your reply.

Sincerely,
Alex [Surname]

This doesn't seem like a form letter – it has my name. On the other hand, what is this “blog-wide text link” he speaks of? [Update: forgot to add, and why if it's not a form letter, does Alex think I'm about to run an ad for his stuff?] I always say “no thanks” to ad solicitations for the reasons set out in Blogs, Ads, and Insurance. Then again, maybe this deserves a custom reply…

Posted in Discourse.net | 2 Comments

I’s Have It

Inevitable: JURIST – Paper Chase: Cuba travel legislation introduced in US House

Injustice: Administrative Law Prof Blog: When the government goofs

Inspiring: Philip Barclay and Grace Mutandwa Blog from the UK Embassy in Zimbabwe. If only the US Embassy staff were empowered to provide honest commentary of this sort in every posting.

Intellectual Humor, John Holbo, Crooked Timber, Lewd and Prude. Don't miss the comments – a good time is had by all, even in the hypo.

Interesting: Ian Ayres, I Pay Them to Leave

Interstate Commerce: Jurist: Federal judge rules sex offender residency law unconstitutional — still the minority view on the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act of 2006 (SORNA).

Posted in Linkorama | Comments Off on I’s Have It

Perils of Comparative Statics

ABC News: A World Without Chocolate?

“If nothing was done, and the temperature was to rise, and the rainfalls were to change and drought became more prevalent … without looking into new farming practices, then there should be a problem, and there might likely be a problem,” he said.

In other words, if we suspend all the known laws of capitalist economics, and if we have very nasty climate change and everyone keeps their behavior utterly unchanged as a result…

No. I have enough to worry about. We may well have global warming, but we'll still have profit-maximization. This is not going on the list.

Posted in Econ & Money | Comments Off on Perils of Comparative Statics

Bloggers Behaving Badly

blogfreedom.jpg

It well could be a tempest in a teapot, but details as to what this is about can be found at Random Pixels and Loose Talk from Miami Beach, It's our birthday … so time to lawyer up!, but basically these comments, produced a threat — so far, just a threat — of a lawsuit by one local blogger against another.

It may not have been wise, and certainly wasn't polite, for Random Pixels to say

The reality is that Babalu is really nothing more than a fringe group of bomb-throwing, anthrax-mailing, loud-mouth fanatics gone high tech.

Impolitic, but I think and hope that were anyone foolish enough to bring suit a jury would have very little trouble finding this wasn't an assertion of fact as to past acts, but rather a hyperbolic analogy. That's certainly how I read it and how I think anyone reasonable would read it.

I hardly ever read Babalu as I have very little patience for monotonous bullies of any stripe. (I suppose I should admit that I read Random Pixels only a little more often, mostly via SFDB links.) But having one blogger sue another over hyperbole would be very silly. Let's hope sanity prevails.

Posted in Blogs | 1 Comment

EU Court of Justice Upholds Validity of Data Retention Directive

The EU Court of Justice has upheld the validity of the Data Retention Directive (“Directive 2006/24/EC Retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of electronic communications services”) in Ireland v Parliament , decided Feb. 10, 2008.

Posted in Civil Liberties, Internet | 1 Comment