Author Archives: Michael Froomkin

Website Offers Hyperlinked Version of Google Book Settlement

James Grimmlenn announces The Public Index: A Website to Study and Discuss the Google Book Search Settlement:

The groundbreaking proposed settlement in the Google Book Search case is so complex that controversy has outpaced conversation and questions have outnumbered answers. We aim to help close these gaps. The Public Index is a website featuring a collection of tools and resources for those wishing to learn about the settlement or to express opinions about it.

The centerpiece of the site is an interactive version of the proposed settlement. Users can search freely, browse by section, or read through it in a hierarchical view that retains the settlement's indentation structure. Hyperlinks allow users to look up any defined term or cross-reference with a single click. A paragraph-by-paragraph commenting system allows them to annotate individual portions of the settlement with their own commentary. To encourage further discussion, the site also provides a full set of bulletin-board forums.

There's more…

Posted in Law: Copyright and DMCA | Comments Off on Website Offers Hyperlinked Version of Google Book Settlement

Notes from the Meritocracy Factory

Blackboard – Test Prep – Just Following Orders – An Evil Essay – NYTimes.com

The author, who has an SAT-prep-firm, took the test in order to see how essays are graded. As an experiment, he wrote the most morally evil essay he could, praising Nazi eugenics. The official SAT rules don't talk morality, promising high scores to an essay that,

effectively and insightfully develops a point of view on the issue and demonstrates outstanding critical thinking, using clearly appropriate examples, reasons, and other evidence to support its position.

And, indeed, he got high marks.

I am sure this explains something, but due to the low quality of the reasoning in his work while in government I am loath to say that this something is John Yoo.

Posted in Etc | 2 Comments

All SSD Drives Are Far From Equal

I had not originally planned to consider buying an SSD drive for my new laptop. There are lots of reasons not to, including the high price, and the relative immaturity of the technology. (The relatively low capacity doesn't bother me much, I've been living fine with a 40GB drive on the current machine.

But three things have led me to consider an SSD: it's standard on some of the machines I'm thinking of; it's not as expensive an upgrade on the others; and the T400s uses 1.8” drives, which I gather are substantially slower than the standard 2.5” disks found in most laptops. Indeed, since drive speed is in substantial part a function of rotational speed it only stands to reason that for any given number of rotations per minute, a disk with a smaller radius will move less information past the read/write point (2πR will be smaller at its greatest point, and the mean will be smaller too).

Thinking about SSDs led me to this marvelous article at AnandTech, The SSD Anthology: Understanding SSDs and New Drives from OCZ. It may be more than most people want to know, but the takeaways are clear:

  • Lots of first-generation SSDs look great at first, then work poorly. Their performance “degrades.”
  • Benchmarks of new laptops with SSDs in them that in any way rely on hard drive performance cannot be trusted unless the test suite has been tweaked to fill up the SSD with data before the testing begins.
  • SSDs vary enormously in quality. The really good ones are insanely expensive.

It also seems that the Lenovs and probably the Dells (at least for their more expensive choice) use Samsung SSDs which get relatively horrible initial benchmarks compares to the leaders, but it seems don't degrade as much as some others.

The sensible thing to do would be to get a conventional disk, and maybe upgrade in a year or two if prices get sensible. But some of the laptop makers do give you a break on prices, so that's less obvious than it might be. Plus, to the extent I'm considering the T400s, the 1.8” form factor may severely restrict the update options. At present almost all the SSD drives on Newegg are 2.5” form factor drives.

I suppose I'm overthinking this, but I enjoy it.

Posted in Sufficiently Advanced Technology | Comments Off on All SSD Drives Are Far From Equal

Laptop Search (cont): Dell E4200?

So, with the help of a colleague's email, I figured out which Dells I should be looking at: the E4200 and E4300. The reviews of the E4300 don't make it look that good; the E4200 gets a better press, although most of it in more general circulation magazines than in the sort of fanatic's web page I tend to trust.

The E4200 with most of the trimmings — said to have many internal components in common with the Lenovo X200 (not X200s), although a somewhat inferior casing — is a 12” laptop with decent battery life, a 1.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo ULV SU9400. Despite the low-power chip, the Dell has a better benchmark (PCMark Vantage 3582) than the Lenovo X301 (1.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, PCMark Vantage is 3157) although I worry the test may have been affected by using a new SSD. The Dell apparently weighs under 3lbs even with a six-cell battery (2.2 lbs with the 4-cell; Dell is annoyingly coy about about the weight with the six-cell version.) There are fewer ports than the Lenovos, but probably enough for my needs.

Prices for new ones are outrageous — I just configured one for $2335 which is more than the better, if heavier, Lenovo. A similar E4200 is available refurbed for just over $1300 with external DVD, which is notably less than the Lenovos.

This is probably the closest thing to a modernized Inspiron 300m. Is that what I want? The refurbs are mostly black, but there's also a red one.

Posted in Shopping | 1 Comment

Correction

I wrote “previously” that my laptop search is now in the decision phase.

Make that “the indecision phase.”

I will certainly delay until I get home next week.

Posted in Shopping | 1 Comment

The Hunt for A New Laptop Continues

My laptop search is now in the decision phase. It's fairly clear that I've not only passed the point of diminishing returns on the scouring of the online reviews and benchmarks, but that it is fast becoming a distant memory.

I've more or less narrowed the choices to the Lenovo X301 (refurb) or the Samsung X360 34P (do they do refurbs?), with the Lenovo T400s (refurb) an outside contender — although it has a bit more weight, its processor benchmarks are about double the other two.

As between the X301 and X360, the Samsung weighs less and seems to have a much better battery life; despite a slower clock speed the Lenovo may be a little faster (although the T400s blows them both out of the water). The other benchmarks I can find are broadly comparable. The Lenovo has an unparalleled reputation for standing up to mistreatment; it is hard to get a sense for how sturdy the Samsung is, other than it's not flimsy.

The Lenovo X301 has a slightly smaller screen than the Samsung (and the T400s has the biggest); the Samsung comes with a bigger SSD for the money (not that I really need it). The Lenovos have optical drives; the Samsung doesn't. The X301 lacks the media card reader and Express Card slot found on the Samsung. (The absence of a docking bay for the Lenovo is not something I care about, as I don't use those.)

Here's a table with more details:

Lenovo X301 Samsung X360 34P Lenovo T400s
Core 2 Duo SU9400/1.4 GH /800 mhz bus Core 2 Duo SU9400/ 1.6 GH /800mhz bus Core 2 Duo SP9600 / 2.53GHz, 6MB Cache / 1066MHz FSB
12.1” 1440×900 1280 × 800 (WXGA), 250 nits 13.3” TFT 1280 × 800 (WXGA ) 300 nits 14” WXGA+ 1440×900 LED backlit LCD  200 nits
Intel GMA 4500 MHD Intel GMA 4500 MHD Intel GMA 4500 MHD & AMD M82XT Switchable Graphics 256MB
3.3 lbs (w/ six cell) 2.9 lbs 3.91 lbs
64 GG SSD 128 GB SSD 80/128 GB SSD
DVD Burner none CD/DVD comobo or DVD Burner
Bluetooth Bluetooth Bluetooth option
3 USB ports 3 USB ports 3 USB (1 powered when off)
None 7 in 1 card reader & Express Card 1 ESATA (doubles w/ USB) & Expresscard (or 5 in 1 )
VGA & Displayport VGA & HDMI VGA & Displayport
c. 3.5 – 4 hours real world battery 5.5 – 6 hours real world battery c 4 hours real world
PCMark05 4457  PCMark05 3061 PCMark05 7590
PCMark Vantage 3157 PCMark Vantage 3158 (for 1.4 GHz version, 1.6 should be better) PCMark Vantage 5251
3D Mark06 712 3D Mark06 996
Build and keyboard are known to be high quality (FN/Ctrl keys  reversed) Build looks ok, keyboard looks at least ok, maybe quite good Build and keyboard are known to be high quality Redesigned “crumbproof” keyboard looks great (FN/Ctrl keys  reversed)
Retail price: $2630 – 2969 Retail price: $1826 – 1998 Retail 2BG, RAM, 128GB SDD, Vista Biz $1814.65
Refurb w/out DVD, 3gb, 64 SDD c. $1476 $1638.30 (w/ 128 GB w/out DVD) Not available yet?
Refurb w/ DVD (rare) 128 SSD : $1930 Not available yet?

Now how do I decide? Not to mention that given the existence of substantially cheaper and adequate — but not as light or as powerful — alternatives it seems a lot of money, even for something I'll probably use frequently over the next several years.

I wish I could see them before buying…

Posted in Shopping, Sufficiently Advanced Technology | 5 Comments