Author Archives: Michael Froomkin

UK Telegraph Reports Bush Admin Makes Next Move in Dirty Campaign?

According to the UK's Daily Telegraph — not the world's most reliable news source for US news, and a good place for right-wing planted stories — the Bush Pentagon has ordered an official investigation into the awards of the Democratic senator's five Vietnam War decorations. This despite the total implosion of the credibility of his accusers.

The request for an investigation originates from Judicial Watch. Their website does not confirm the story, saying only that the “Inspector General (“IG”) of the Department of Defense has informed the Secretary of the Navy” of his receipt of their complaint. And indeed the letter reproduced on Judicial Watch's site is nothing more than a receipt (.pdf).

A quick look at the complaint suggests it's pretty silly, and based largely on the Swift Boat Vets testimony that is now thoroughly discredited. The two main charges are (1) O'Neill's book says Kerry's medals are frauds and the various discredited swift boat vets (e.g. the doctor who didn't actually treat him) agree; and (2) [brace yourself:]

Dishonorable and possibly unlawful actions by Senator Kerry during the early 1970s – actions that manifestly benefited a foreign power with which the U.S. was at war – are so grievously damaging to the dignity, honor and traditions of the U.S. Navy and the American republic that the Secretary of the Navy may be compelled to revoke Senator Kerry’s awards.

And did I mention (3), (4) and (5): “dereliction of duty; misuse and abuse of U.S. government equipment and property; war crimes”?

In other words, Judicial Watch thinks stay-at-home Bush's Navy should revoke Kerry's award in the middle of a Presidential campaign — for opposing the Vietnam war and testifying to Congress! You can't make this stuff up.

While the Judicial Watch complaint and the Navy's receipt of it are verified, there is at this moment no confirmation of the Telegraph's account of the opening an actual investigation either on CNN, the NYT or Washington Post web sites, so I have some doubts the Telegraph report is true. The version running in the Chicago-Sun Times is much less detailed and also more credible and consistent with Judicial Watch's website—but might also have been filed earlier than the Telegraph's report.

But, no, I can't believe it — the statute of limitations must have passed for any offense imaginable, and hence the Navy would have no grounds for an investigation even if it thought Kerry was on LSD the whole time. I just won't believe this until it's confirmed elsewhere.

Meanwhile, to coin a phrase, I report, you decide. Below, excerpts from the Telegraph's report and then the Sun-Times's, and a little more about Judicial Watch's latest odd allegations:

Continue reading

Posted in Politics: US: 2004 Election | 7 Comments

Wonkette Warns Bloggers Against Hubris

The excellent Washington Note summarizes what sounds like a rollicking session at the APSA meeting:

The Wonkette herself, Ana Marie Cox, stole the show by being the anti-blogger's blogger. She said that there is too much “blogger triumphalism” in the blogosphere and lamented Andrew Sullivan's absence because he was her favorite blogger triumphalist.

According to Wonkette, Andrew Sullivan says that “the revolution will be blogged.” Her dry response, “to have a revolution, you have to leave the house.” She also said that the blogging medium owes the most to AOL sex chat rooms since “both involve staying at home, pleasuring one's self.”

There were also some serious and worthy papers presented…

Posted in Blogs | Comments Off on Wonkette Warns Bloggers Against Hubris

Windy

Frances is north east of here and heading somewhat northwesterly, so unless it does an Andrew and skitters south as it hits land, we're going to be subject to tropical storm winds at the worst, plus some gusts, and maybe not even that. But it's so slow now that it may take another 16-24 hours, or even more, before we know it's safe to take down the shutters.

So far, it's pretty windy, and there's been some rain, but nothing you would get excited about if they didn't have those big swirly cloud pictures at the National Center for Atmospheric Research.

The Miami Herald delivered a special early edition last night since they figured they might not be able to get through the water this morning; that was before Frances slowed down ever farther (more waiting in the dark behind our shutters!). The NYT didn't deliver at all. The electricty has the occasional flicker, but so far so good.

Our next problem is that Tropical Storm Ivan. Frances needs to get out of the way so that they can open the shops — I don't think we have enough food for two storms in a row.

Posted in Miami | Comments Off on Windy

John Young, Translated

I've occasionally mentioned the often admirable John Young, noting his 'encrypted neo-Joycean prose style'.

Well, Seth Finkelstein has been kind enough to offer a translation of one of John's only moderately encrypted missives.

Posted in Readings | 1 Comment

Effective Propaganda

I have no reason to share in this flash movie's paranoid imaginings, and one good reason (Occam's Razor) not to. But as a piece of shockwave-flash craft, and as effective propaganda, Pentagon Strike is a model of its kind.

Update (9/6/04): Snopes debunks it.

Posted in 9/11 & Aftermath | 1 Comment

Free Country Datum V: ‘The System Worked’

George Paine at Warblogging.com says that the fact that protestors got sprung realllly sloooowly, but faster than the cops wanted, is a sign the system worked. In one sense, of course, he's right: in a very unfree country protestors vanish, or get four years of hard labor.

Warblogging.com: Judge to City: You're in ContemptThe New York Civil Liberties Union and the National Lawyers Guild filed writs of habeas corpus with the State Supreme Court earlier this week. A judge responded immediately by issuing a writ ordering the release of detainees held for more than 24 hours. The city appealed and was granted a stay. But yesterday the case came before Judge Cataldo, who again ordered immediate release.

At noon, arguing before Judge Cataldo, the city corporation counsel said “We couldn't get everyone processed as quickly as we liked… We're doing our best.” Judge Cataldo immediately replied “I'm ordering that.”

Later in the hearing the judge told the corporation counsel that “These people have already been the victims of a process. I can no longer accept your statement that you are trying to comply.”

By 6pm the NYPD had released few demonstrators. It was at this point that Judge Cataldo grew frusterated. He ordered a $1,000 fine for every protester still behind bars.

An hour later there had still been no movement by the NYPD. “We're coming back again until this is settled,” the judge said. “Once again, the order is, release these people.”

Norman Siegel of the New York Civil Liberties Union complained to the judge that it was only protesters who were being disadvanted by the city. He noted that actual criminals were being arraigned within the 24 hour window the law provides. “The only people being disadvantaged here are the protesters. We're arraigning robbers who have only been in 10 hours.”

Finally, hours later, the city began releasing detainees. They were met by hundreds of well-wishers, including friends and family, who cheered their release.

The reason that so many protesters were held so long without charges is obvious. Charges against most protesters would simply not stick. They were caught up in police nets — literally — and the victims of arbitrary arrest. They were charged with minor transgressions such as “blocking the sidewalk”.

The system, with lots of support from civil libertarian lawyers and the judiciary, has worked. The protesters have been released — and many were released in time for George Bush's speech at the RNC. Unfortunately the taxpayers will literally pay the bill for the NYPD's illegal detention of these protesters. First we will pay Judge Cataldo's fine. Next we will pay to settle the lawsuits of those detained.

If the protestors win anything above token damages, then I'd score this a victory.

Posted in Civil Liberties | Comments Off on Free Country Datum V: ‘The System Worked’