Author Archives: Michael Froomkin

Will the Revolution Be Subsidized?

The BBC calls it Rise of the anoraks (“anoraks” being English slang for people who wear uncool windbreakers and study science or math). Demos, probably the UK's most interesting think tank, calls it The Pro-Am Revolution: How enthusiasts are changing our economy and society.

Demos says that the people it calls “Pro-Ams”—meaning “amateurs who pursue a hobby to a professional standard” including serious amateur astronomers and open source coders—should receive government funding to “promote community cohesion”.

It's nice to see the bottom-up revolution being noticed. Whether it needs subsidizing, though, and how one would do so without distorting it (and without enormous waste), seem like fairly hard questions. But I haven't yet read the full report.

Posted in Readings, UK | 2 Comments

George Bush’s Best Appointment?

Admittedly, the competition is not exactly tough, but based on Kudos where deserved, I suspect that Tony Hall, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Food and Agricultural Agencies, is GWB's best appointee.

Posted in Politics: International | Comments Off on George Bush’s Best Appointment?

More Anti-Spam Measures

As an experiment, I will be closing down comments on all posts that haven't had any comments for a few weeks. The idea is to shrink the target for comment spammers — I had hundreds of comment spams over the weekend despite MT-Blacklist and I'm getting more than a little fed up swatting it all.

Posted in Discourse.net | 2 Comments

While You Were Worrying About the Budget

While you and I were worrying about the budget — borrow more money to fund the move away from guaranteed social security???? — The American Street has been Waiting for a Protein to Shift.

Flu pandemic? If this keeps up I'm expecting a Biblical Flood.

Oh, wait. Global warming means Florida is going to be under water.

Posted in Science/Medicine | Comments Off on While You Were Worrying About the Budget

Watching a Precedent Happen

The New York Times has an entertaining story today describing how a precedent is born. In this case, other courts seized on attractive legal reasoning even though the entire opinion turned out to be based on facts that had not taken the trouble to exist. See Legal Precedent Doesn't Let Facts Stand in the Way for the details.

I suppose it helps to be a lawyer to understand why this isn't nearly as weird as it sounds. Judging from the article, the original opinion was one that guided the parties — evidence is admissible if the following conditions exist. Yes, the judge wrote the opinion thinking those conditions existed…but when they turned out not to exist, the opinion was still valid as it explained why the evidence was not admissible after all. So it wasn't dicta. And if in fact other courts found the reasoning persuasive, so much the better for them. (Whether in fact the opinion is correct is, however, a whole different question….)

Posted in Law: Criminal Law | 6 Comments

XP SP2, So Far, So-So

I finally broke down an installed SP2 on my laptop, a bright blue Dell 300m. SP2 had been running fine on my desk top for a while, and also trouble-free on my wife's desktop, plus the laptop maker's web site endorsed it, plus all the tech columns I read (notably Ed Bott) endorsed it, so I figured, it's time.

The results are mixed. The laptop seems a little slower, especially on boot up. And one other change I made at the same time is not working out at all well. Having read all this tech advice about XP, I saw that there was a strong consensus that I shouldn't ordinarily be logged in as an 'administrator' but should be operating as a 'limited' account to prevent anything untoward taking over my PC.

Well, OK, I'm a very obedient guy when it comes to computer security (unlike most of the rest of my life), so I create a 'root' account, make it an administrator and change my usual account to 'limited' status. But now when I try to turn off the computer, both Explorer and the 'Power Meter' hang. This doesn't seem to happen when I am running solely as 'root'. All I can say is….harrumph.

Update: The indefatigable Ed Bott notes that I've run into a known Win XP problem with the 'limited' permissions identity. HARRUMPH again: they release a major service pack supposedly aimed at fixing security holes and they can't fix something like this which is a known bug — one with security implications — regarding the relationship between the MS OS and the MS Explorer programs? Come on guys!

Posted in Software | 4 Comments