Author Archives: Michael Froomkin

Lloyd Cutler

Former Clinton Counsel Lloyd Cutler Dies at 87


When I worked for Wilmer, Cutler in London I had the privilege of working for “Lloyd” as he wanted to be called (not that we younguns ever quite did) on a pro-bono matter. Lloyd Cutler had drafted the firm to help him in connection with an international project to advise Czechoslovakia, which was trying to draft a new constitution. (We were too late — they cut the deal that doomed them to split two days before we made our presentations.) I found a very impressive and decent man, with a dash of the Washington fixer.

The Washington Post quotes its former ombudsman as describing him as “a corporate godfather by day and Sister Theresa by night.” Sounds about right.

Lloyd Cutler worked on many good causes, and as one of the US’s equivalent of the ‘great and the good’ performed many public services. His greatest achievement may be the institution he left behind. I don’t know whether it’s still as true today, but the Wilmer, Cutler I worked in was an impressive and highly decent place, a Washington institution, a litigation powerhouse at once intellectual and moral, with an intense commitment to public service. Not many firms manage that. Not many people can help create something like that — and then let go at the right time.

I last saw him here in Miami in January 2003, when the National Research Council’s CSTB Committee on “Privacy in the Information Age,” which he chaired, held a meeting here. He was older, and moved less surely, but the fire (and the growl) was still there, undiminished.

Posted in Personal | 2 Comments

Three is the Loneliest Number

A followup to Three is a Convenient Number to State, in which I noted how the US was trumpeting the capture of yet another third-in-command Al-Qaeda leader — the British and world press are reporting that Captured Al-Qaeda kingpin is case of ‘mistaken identity’:

THE capture of a supposed Al-Qaeda kingpin by Pakistani agents last week was hailed by President George W Bush as “a critical victory in the war on terror”. According to European intelligence experts, however, Abu Faraj al-Libbi was not the terrorists’ third in command, as claimed, but a middle-ranker derided by one source as “among the flotsam and jetsam” of the organisation.

As yet there is no sign of this story in the US media, at least not in the sources covered by news.google.com.

Posted in 9/11 & Aftermath | 9 Comments

Two Sets of Leaks from the NSA

Speaking of the NSA, here are links to two stories about the NSA.

There's stuff in the Wayne Masden article that seems all too plausible. And, as is so often the case, there's also some seriously tinfoily stuff in Madsen's report, notably the allegation that,

NSA has recorded tactical communications intelligence—overheard on a speaker system in the NSOC—that demonstrates that United Flight 93 was shot down by U.S. fighter planes over Pennsylvania on September 11, 2001, and the Bush administration concocted a phony “patriotic” cover story about the passengers and crew deliberately crashing the plane into the ground.

I am very dubious. I just don't think they could keep something that big under wraps so long. Consider how quickly the tissue of lies about the 'friendly fire' killing of Pat Tilman began to unravel. I suppose you could argue that if it took a year for the whole story to come out on a minor thing like that, a really major cover up would last longer. But surely someone would have talked?

Posted in National Security, Politics: Tinfoil | 13 Comments

Meaningless Personality Quiz (pt. 9)

I suppose some readers will think this a tad high, but it sounds plausible to me.

I am:

28%

Republican.

“You're probably one of those people who still thinks that getting a [Clinton] is not an impeachable offense.”

Are You A Republican?

It's a pretty funny quiz.

Posted in Meaningless Personality Quizzes | 5 Comments

Wikipedia Comic

You know the wikipedia is famous when it's in the comics.

Today's Foxtrot:

[click cartoon for larger image if it's not legible]

In fact, of course, the wikipedia has quite strong antibodies against this sort of thing. But it's still very funny.

Posted in Internet | Comments Off on Wikipedia Comic

Bolton: It’s a Constitutional Crisis Now

The Bolton Affair, which until now was just an engrossing political slug-fest in which the Vice-President gambled his boss's political future has suddenly lurched into a Constitutional crisis.

The administration has put so many chips on the table for this one that losing would not only dent, but actually detonate, its image of invulnerability. Once blood is in the water the legislative sharks start to circle, and the administration's ability to cram legislation down congress's throat becomes reduced or non-existent. So far, that's just politics as usual. (Clinton's moment of defeat was the first week of his first Presidency, when he went back on his promise to let gays serve openly in the military. Everyone on the Hill understood that if Clinton would back down on a campaign promise when confronted by people sworn to obey him, he could be rolled like a drunk when it came to dealing with legislators with their own agendas. Health care died in the Oval Office before the Clinton administration was two weeks old.)

What is not politics as usual is that the Bush administration has suddenly escalated the Bolton stakes yet again — this time to a constitutional crisis level. Bolton is suspected of using NSA intercepts to spy on his colleagues or to undermine then-Secretary of State Powell. Nothing has been proved. The chair of the Foreign Relations Committee and Democratic Senators have asked to see copies of the same NSA intercepts that Bolton (a mid level appointee) was allowed to see, in order for the Senate to weigh those charges.

Now the administration has said Senators with a constitutional advise and consent duty can't have the same access to NSA intercepts that third-level state department people get. As Steve Clemons says, that changes everything.

It's possible there may be nothing in the intercepts. It would be classic Rove to build them up in the hopes that they become the sole issue — distracting everyone from the out-of-control maniac who allegedly ran down a Moscow hotel room chasing a low-level bureaucrat for the crime of being honest, banging her door and howling like a loon, and then later spending days trying to destroy her career. Build the intercepts up as the only issue, then give in, say that the administration went the 'extra mile' and see! Bolton has been 'cleared'! That would be classic Rove indeed.

So it's important not to let the intercepts become the entire show in this three-ring circus. But it's also important that the Senate not set a precedent that it can be treated like a potted plant.

Posted in Law: Constitutional Law | 1 Comment