Author Archives: Michael Froomkin

Two Sets of Leaks from the NSA

Speaking of the NSA, here are links to two stories about the NSA.

There's stuff in the Wayne Masden article that seems all too plausible. And, as is so often the case, there's also some seriously tinfoily stuff in Madsen's report, notably the allegation that,

NSA has recorded tactical communications intelligence—overheard on a speaker system in the NSOC—that demonstrates that United Flight 93 was shot down by U.S. fighter planes over Pennsylvania on September 11, 2001, and the Bush administration concocted a phony “patriotic” cover story about the passengers and crew deliberately crashing the plane into the ground.

I am very dubious. I just don't think they could keep something that big under wraps so long. Consider how quickly the tissue of lies about the 'friendly fire' killing of Pat Tilman began to unravel. I suppose you could argue that if it took a year for the whole story to come out on a minor thing like that, a really major cover up would last longer. But surely someone would have talked?

Posted in National Security, Politics: Tinfoil | 13 Comments

Meaningless Personality Quiz (pt. 9)

I suppose some readers will think this a tad high, but it sounds plausible to me.

I am:

28%

Republican.

“You're probably one of those people who still thinks that getting a [Clinton] is not an impeachable offense.”

Are You A Republican?

It's a pretty funny quiz.

Posted in Meaningless Personality Quizzes | 5 Comments

Wikipedia Comic

You know the wikipedia is famous when it's in the comics.

Today's Foxtrot:

[click cartoon for larger image if it's not legible]

In fact, of course, the wikipedia has quite strong antibodies against this sort of thing. But it's still very funny.

Posted in Internet | Comments Off on Wikipedia Comic

Bolton: It’s a Constitutional Crisis Now

The Bolton Affair, which until now was just an engrossing political slug-fest in which the Vice-President gambled his boss's political future has suddenly lurched into a Constitutional crisis.

The administration has put so many chips on the table for this one that losing would not only dent, but actually detonate, its image of invulnerability. Once blood is in the water the legislative sharks start to circle, and the administration's ability to cram legislation down congress's throat becomes reduced or non-existent. So far, that's just politics as usual. (Clinton's moment of defeat was the first week of his first Presidency, when he went back on his promise to let gays serve openly in the military. Everyone on the Hill understood that if Clinton would back down on a campaign promise when confronted by people sworn to obey him, he could be rolled like a drunk when it came to dealing with legislators with their own agendas. Health care died in the Oval Office before the Clinton administration was two weeks old.)

What is not politics as usual is that the Bush administration has suddenly escalated the Bolton stakes yet again — this time to a constitutional crisis level. Bolton is suspected of using NSA intercepts to spy on his colleagues or to undermine then-Secretary of State Powell. Nothing has been proved. The chair of the Foreign Relations Committee and Democratic Senators have asked to see copies of the same NSA intercepts that Bolton (a mid level appointee) was allowed to see, in order for the Senate to weigh those charges.

Now the administration has said Senators with a constitutional advise and consent duty can't have the same access to NSA intercepts that third-level state department people get. As Steve Clemons says, that changes everything.

It's possible there may be nothing in the intercepts. It would be classic Rove to build them up in the hopes that they become the sole issue — distracting everyone from the out-of-control maniac who allegedly ran down a Moscow hotel room chasing a low-level bureaucrat for the crime of being honest, banging her door and howling like a loon, and then later spending days trying to destroy her career. Build the intercepts up as the only issue, then give in, say that the administration went the 'extra mile' and see! Bolton has been 'cleared'! That would be classic Rove indeed.

So it's important not to let the intercepts become the entire show in this three-ring circus. But it's also important that the Senate not set a precedent that it can be treated like a potted plant.

Posted in Law: Constitutional Law | 1 Comment

It’s Personal Now

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid's mad. Reid Calls Bush a 'Loser'. And it looks as if it has something to do with this:

Two weeks ago, Reid essentially called Bush a liar when Vice President Cheney said he agreed with Senate Republicans about changing the filibuster rule. Reid said that violated a commitment Bush had made to stay out of the fight. Reid said that it “appears he was not being honest.”

I missed that comment when it happened, although I inferred it (cf. The Telling Detail).

Actually, it's much worse than mere lying. Bush lies to us all the time, and few professional politicians take it personally, more's the pity. Politicians lie, and others live with it. But what this story is about is breaking your word, delivered eye-to-eye in private. Senators see that as much worse than lying to the public.

Posted in Politics: US | 2 Comments

Three is a Convenient Number to State

First Draft – Got Any Threes? notices that we sure seem to be catching a lot of third-ranking al Qaeda leaders.

Of course, there could be all sorts of explanations for this: ties, replacements, fudging….

(Apologies to those offended by Snarks).

Posted in 9/11 & Aftermath | Comments Off on Three is a Convenient Number to State