Monthly Archives: February 2008

Diebold Slip-Up Releases 2008 Election Result Ahead of Schedule

Diebold Accidentally Leaks Results Of 2008 Election Early.


It really is America's Finest News Source.

Posted in Completely Different | 1 Comment

WSJ Says Florida Leads the Nation

According to the Wall St. Journal's Objection! Funny Legal Ads Draw Censure, Florida leads the nation in restrictions on the use of animals in lawyer advertising.

Tigers are OK. Lions probably. But no sharks or pit bulls. Go figure.

The article is limited only to animals and TV ads; had they mentioned advertising rules more generally, and especially the evolving rules relating to law firm web pages, they'd have had to mention New York state's increasingly restrictive policies, quite possibly worse than Florida's.

Posted in Florida | 1 Comment

It Wasn’t Me!

Geniusofdespair confesses in Blogger hits University of Miami President Donna Shalala with a chair.

Note that I had nothing to do with this incident: We here on campus are still marveling at the $1.4bn President Shalala has raised for the “U”, so we're more likely to hit her with outstretched palms than anything else…

Posted in U.Miami | Comments Off on It Wasn’t Me!

CNN Sinks to a New Low

Wow, CNN doesn't have much in the way of journalistic standards, does it?

CNN’s Idiot ‘is Obama really a Patriot’ Poll

Americablog calls it unforgivable.

Personally, I'd be willing to forgive if they behave decently for the rest of the campaign. Not that there's much chance of it.

I thought CNN was supposed to be better than Fox? Then again, AP's notorious far-right-leaning Nedra Pickler sunk pretty low yesterday too.

Update: Thanks to Firedoglake, you can take action against the Nedra Pickler smear factory.

Update2: Greenwald on Obama's brilliant retort.

Update 3: Well, that didn't take long, did it? CNN blows it again.

Posted in The Media | 1 Comment

John Scalzi Can Rant

Science fiction writer John Scalzi knows how to write a rant. And what's better, he's on the right side of this one.

See A Gut Check Moment for SFWA for a classic example of the genre. And entertaining comments from a bevy of science fiction luminaries.

Posted in Law: Copyright and DMCA, Readings | Comments Off on John Scalzi Can Rant

NY Times on Obama’s Security: Clueless or Coy?

The New York Times's Jeff Zeleny has a long article about people worrying about Barack Obama's safety, In Painful Past, Hushed Worry About Obama.

In the past few days, a major Dallas-area paper ran a two inconclusive stories about the level of security at Obama's Dallas rally. These stories were supplemented by a number of blog posts all over the place, many of which include eyewitness accounts of recent Obama rallies elsewhere which also seemed to have a level of security that was at best uneven. Given all that, you might expect that when the Times does a major article on fears for Obama's security, something would be said about what happened in Dallas at the Obama rally.

You would be wrong.

Here's all that the NYT has to say on the subject of Dallas security:

Here in Dallas, those memories were raised in conversation after conversation with several of the 17,000 people who came to see Mr. Obama at a rally last week.

“Right around the corner is the John Kennedy Memorial; everyone all around me was talking about it,” said Imogene Covin, a Democratic activist from Dallas. “In the back of my mind, it’s a possibility that something might happen because he’s something to gawk at right now. But you know why I think he will be safe? He has a broad range of people behind him.”

In fact, as readers of this blog or many others, or of the Dallas-Fort Worth Star-Telegram, know “here in Dallas,” there was a lot more than “memories raised in conversation” — there were allegations by the local cops of bad security judgment. And the Secret Service's response while not totally implausible, hasn't been totally convincing either.

Should we expect better from the Times?

I suppose it's possible the NYT is being coy as a result of a request from the Secret Service not to discuss operational details, but if that were the case you would think that they could tell us so. I can't help but wonder if they just didn't know about the controversy, or if this is another example of an article going into the hopper several days before its printed and being dated by the time it sees daylight.

I've written to Mr. Zeleny to ask, but don't really expect an answer.

Related posts:

Posted in Politics: US: 2008 Elections, The Media | Comments Off on NY Times on Obama’s Security: Clueless or Coy?