Author Archives: Michael Froomkin

We Have Cool Alumni

A fellow lawprof who watches more TV than I do writes,

since you enjoy following the exploits of your alums, I wanted to make sure that you knew that Ray Whitty, a ’00 Miami alum (currently an associate at Brinks Hofer), is (with his girlfriend, Yolanda) among the final four teams on The Amazing Race and finished first this past Wednesday.

I admit that this wasn’t exactly what I had in mind when I said our students should “take charge of their own futures, think big, take risks, do unconventional things, and take large efforts to apply for many things and risk tons of rejection, to get what they want”… but maybe I just wasn’t thinking big enough.

Posted in U.Miami | Comments Off on We Have Cool Alumni

Geekster Rap

Now this is joy: a rap song about cryptography! And of course it is called Alice and Bob. It’s by MC Plus+, and I found it via Bruce Shneier who’s mentioned in the song. Lyrics here, and an article at Wired.

Posted in Cryptography, Kultcha | Comments Off on Geekster Rap

What We Learn from Google in China

Open Internet Policy “don’t be evil” an albatross around Google’s neck is Danny Weitzner’s excellent account of the highlights of one of the more interesting panels at CFP this year.

Posted in Talks & Conferences | 1 Comment

John Young, Man of Mystery

Several times over the years I’ve attended conferences where John Young, the proprietor of Cryptome, was registered to attend, but no one ever picked up his name tag.

I was thus very pleased to see that John Young was scheduled to lead a BoF (birds of a feather session) at CFP at 10pm Thursday night. I extricated myself from the bar punctually at 10 (incidentally, Foggy Bottom Ale is a boring beer), found the Monet ballroom…and there was no John Young. I don’t know if I and the rest of the group who turned up to hear him talk about the ways in which log files tell tales all went to the wrong place, or if he didn’t show, but I still haven’t met him.

Update: John writes to say that no one ever told him that the BoF proposal had been accepted. Grrrr….

Update(2) Here’s what he posted at cryptome.org:

Well, nobody told me my CFP BOF proposal on log file betrayal had been accepted, and there was nothing on the CFP website about it. Earlier, a CFP talk proposal on Cryptome’s updated report on field testing of DC-area intelligence facilities security had been rejected, so I figured I was dead to the opinionshapers.

Log files are the dirtiest secret of the Net. Debate about them would have been funny but not that funny, cruel but caring about denial of Net log file spying by com, edu org, blog and individuals — the greatest threat to privacy and completely unregulated, and because unadmitted and disclosed more criminal than the data-gathering by spooks and the ususal suspects so beloved to point fingers at. Got any idea what the finger-pointers do with their log files, who they are shown to, sold to, stolen by? The hoary argument that administrators need them to protect their systems is no different and no more trustworthy than what the spooks and search-engines proclaim about protecting their victims.

It’s been said before: Privacy policy is a deception if log files are kept, and nobody tells the truth about them. Privacy policy is means to hide log file exploitation for ad hits, for funding, for meeting spying contract terms, for feeling superior.

No way to avoid the plague except to diconnect: Anonymizers keep log files, produce them upon demand or for a fee, some admit it, liars swear no way, never. Proxies are penetrable and traceable. Crypto is crackable and trackable. Your 24×7 cybersecurity firm is cooptable by a covert deal. Your sweetheart aint.

Posted in Talks & Conferences | 2 Comments

More on Rumsfled

I was quite struck by two features of this AP article, Rumsfeld Is Confronted by Antiwar Protesters, on Rumsfeld’s encounter with Ray McGovern.

Consider the first three paragraphs:

ATLANTA, May 4 — Antiwar protesters repeatedly interrupted Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld during a speech Thursday, and one man, a former CIA analyst, accused him in a question-and-answer session of lying about prewar intelligence on Iraq.

“Why did you lie to get us into a war that caused these kind of casualties and was not necessary?” asked Ray McGovern, the former analyst.

“I did not lie,” shot back Rumsfeld, who waved off security guards ready to remove McGovern from the hall at the Southern Center for International Studies.

First, note that neither here nor elsewhere in the article does the reporter note that McGovern read Rumsfeld his own statement. The result is to suggest the trading of accusations, not the allegation of a fact and the failure to respond to it.

Second, and most shocking of all, the reporter seems utterly unfazed by the idea that asking a tough question in a public meeting might suffice as grounds to have security wrestle McGovern away. Only Rumsfeld’s indulgence, he ‘waved off security guards’ saved him.

How have we come to this?

Posted in Civil Liberties, The Media | 20 Comments

Rumsfeld’s Lips

Rumsfeld Called Out On Lies About WMD:

Speaking in Atlanta today, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was sharply questioned about his pre-war claims about WMD in Iraq. An audience member [CIA veteran Ray McGovern] confronted Rumsfeld with his 2003 claim about WMD, “We know where they are.” Rumsfeld falsely claimed he never said it. The audience member then read Rumsfeld’s quote back to him, leaving the defense secretary speechless.

See the video.

This will surely enhance the SecDef’s standing with the officer corps, whose concept of honor is somewhat less elastic.

Posted in Politics: The Party of Sleaze | 6 Comments