Author Archives: Michael Froomkin

Best Giuliani Takedown Video

The REAL Rudy: Command Center video — probably the best Rudy Giuliani takedown video ever.

Posted in Politics: US: 2008 Elections | Comments Off on Best Giuliani Takedown Video

Hard at Work

Great compilation at The Democratic Party | It's Working? That Old Line Again?:

“The terrorists and the Baathists loyal to the old regime will fail because America and our allies have a strategy, and ours trategy is working.”
President Bush
November 1, 2003

“Our strategy is working.”
Vice President Cheney
September 28, 2004

“That's our strategy. And it is working and it is going to work, for the good of the country.”
President Bush
June 24, 2005

“Our strategy is working.”
White House's “National Strategy for Victory in Iraq”
November 30, 2005

“This approach is working.”
President Bush
December 7, 2005

“It is a concrete example of how our strategy is working.”
Frm. White House spokesman Scott McClellan
March 20, 2006

“It took time to understand and adjust to the brutality of the enemy in Iraq. Yet the strategy is working.”
President Bush
March 20, 2006

Expect to be worked over again next week when the White House issues its report under Gen. Petraeus's name.

Posted in Iraq | 1 Comment

IDoTears.com

“I do tears.” – President George W. Bush

Yes, it's enough to make you cry.

Posted in Politics: US: GW Bush Scandals | 1 Comment

Fascinating Discussion About AEI

These two blog posts about the AEI,

are really interesting, and the howls in the comments to them are even more so.

Both are mainstream partial defenses of the AEI-as-it-was (an anti-Brookings) and to a very much more limited extent as it is — a think tank in the tank to donors, overrun with neo-con supports of draconian social policies and extremist militarist aggression eerily reminiscent of the Imperial Japanese Navy General Staff, which nonetheless remains a home to a few policy people who don't live on a full-time diet of Kool-Aid.

In the comments, some people agree that the AEI deserves props for lingering broad-mindedness (and the lingerers don't deserve guilt by association); others say that conditions have reached a point where guilt by association is appropriate; still others attack the very idea of policy 'analysis' that isn't willing or able to subject itself to peer review, there's debate as to whether a think-tank is more effective if it's centrist and nuanced, or extreme and rabid, and so on …. All in all, something to read.

Posted in Politics: US | 2 Comments

ABA Withdraws Proposed Bar Pass Standard

I was amazed to learn that the ABA apparently withdrew — or at least delayed — the controversial proposed bar pass standard, aka Interpretation 301-6, more than two weeks ago.

Here are some Comments sent to the ABA regarding Proposed Interpretation 301-6: (comments1); (comments2); (comments3); (comments4); and (comments5).

I’ve been unable to find an official notice of the withdrawal, but it’s reported in this Press Release from the National Lawyers Guild.

Previous posts:

 

Posted in Law School | Comments Off on ABA Withdraws Proposed Bar Pass Standard

My That’s a Big Sabre You Are Rattling There

Over at Hullabaloo, tristero gies credence to the idea that the nuclear missiles “accidentally” flown via B-52 from Minot, North Dakota to Barksdale, Louisiana, in violation of policy that we don't have planes with nukes flying around the US, were actually flown there intentionally because, he says, “Barksdale Air Force Base is being used as a jumping off point for Middle East operations. “

His theory — they want to drop the big one on Iran.

I do think that's a bit tinfoily. But it would not be hard to persuade me that this “accident” and the “unauthorized leak” were some sort of psychops procedure to make the Iranians think we plan to bomb them.

In some ways I think I'd rather believe that than the official, and most likely, story—that a pilot could fly off with at least five nukes by mistake. And no one would notice for three hours.

Posted in Iran, Politics: Tinfoil | 2 Comments