Scott did win. Amazing.
Judge Newman pulled it out, ending up with 53% of the vote, but Judge Seff didn't come close, only getting 43%.
Otherwise, it doesn't look like anything major changed overnight. (Earlier post: So How Did We Do?.)
Scott did win. Amazing.
Judge Newman pulled it out, ending up with 53% of the vote, but Judge Seff didn't come close, only getting 43%.
Otherwise, it doesn't look like anything major changed overnight. (Earlier post: So How Did We Do?.)
Sink, check; Meek, check and bigtime (over weird and unsavory billionaire Jeff Greene); Gelber, check.
(The ones I voted for are in bold.)
Locally, with about 2/3 of the precincts reporting…
Circuit Judges – Group 45: Samantha Ruiz Cohen coasted to victory over incumbent Judge Peter Adrien. This is good.
Circuit Judges: – Group 62: Robert Kuntz seems to be losing big to Monica Gordo; a shame, I think, but not a problem.
County Judges – Group 7: Incumbent Judge Edward Newman (50.6% at this moment, but it's varied) neck and neck with Manuel 'Manny' Alvarez.
County Judges – Group 11: Incumbent Judge Flora Seff seems to have lost to the relatively unqualified but Hispanically-named Michaelle Gonzalez-Paulson. I don't think this is good, both because the incumbent didn't deserve to lose and because this (and perhaps the Newman race above, although that is more complex) tends to support the widespread and not-unreasonable belief that a lot of uninformed voters just vote for the judge with a Hispanic name.
School Board District 6: Dr. Kitchka Petrova never had a chance. The only question was how big a margin Raquelita Regaldo would win by. In the last days before the election, her campaign sent me a box with an apple in it containing a note saying “For the apple of your eyes and mine, we must salvage our public education”. The next day it was a small (mini-golf size) pencil and a sharpener (“Salvaging our Public Education from Financial Disaster Require that We Sharpen Our Pencils and Get Back to Basics!”) Education, teachers, apples and pencils, get it? So far the margin is overwhelming, pushing 60% of the total vote. Name recognition and a huge financial advantage.
Charter Amendment Eliminating the Office of County Manager: I supported NO, but suspected Yes would win — voters liking the sound of eliminating a government job. So far Yes is winning 60-40, so I think that's the outcome. Pity.
Home Rule Charter Amendment Authorizing County Commission to Abolish Municipalities of Twenty or Fewer Electors: Everyone was for YES. Winning but only 64-36.
Home Rule Charter Amendment Relating to Franchises: I supported NO, feared Yes would win, but NO is winning 67-32.
The other races I was watching were:
I'll update this in the morning if the final totals change anything. The closest races are the GOP primary for Governor, and the nail-biter for County Judges – Group 7
The lower part of Miami-Dade ballot contains non-partisan races that often don't get the attention they deserve. Here are some recommendations on how to vote:
Circuit Judges – Group 45: Samantha Ruiz Cohen
Circuit Judges: – Group 62: Robert Kuntz
County Judges – Group 7: Edward Newman
County Judges – Group 11: Flora Seff
School Board District 6: Dr. Kitchka Petrova
Charter Amendment Eliminating the Office of County Manager: NO
Home Rule Charter Amendment Authorizing County Commission to Abolish Municipalities of Twenty or Fewer Electors: YES
Home Rule Charter Amendment Relating to Franchises: NO
Explanations for these suggestions will be found in these five blog posts:
Part I: Introduction
Part II: Circuit Judges
Part III: County Judges
Part IV: School Board, District 6
Part V: Miami-Dade County Charter Amendments
[UPDATE: forgot to mention the obvious — today is election day for these races!]
The highly reliable folks at US News have given the University of Miami another bump in the rankings, raising it to 47, and vaulting it above its in-state rivals. The local booster rag, the Miami Herald, duly pens a very favorable local story, Once derided, University of Miami basks in now-lofty status.
For all the USN rankings' lack of science, there is something real going on here. In fact, there are two sets of things.
Locally, “the U” has made enormous strides in the past decade — new faculty being hired in the departments are smart and industrious, SAT scores are way up, there is a great sense of optimism.
Equally significantly, the cash-poor state of Florida has been starving its public universities, and that as much as anything may account for their declining USN scores.
Indeed, the parlous condition of public higher education around the country is, I suppose, another argument for the legitimacy of private education if the private schools are better able to weather hard times: they keep us from eating all the seed corn. Of course, the counter-argument is that if elites had to send their children to the state system then they would take better care of it….
I have been cited in the Canadian Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering in an article entitled, Microcontroller Application in Cryptography Techniques, which appears at Vol. 1, No. 4, June 2010 and is by Ali E. Taki El Deen and Noha A. Hikal. Normally it warms the cockles of my heart to be cited by cryptographers. But not this time.
You see, the place where my article, The Metaphor is the Key: Cryptography, the Clipper Chip and the Constitution, 143 U. Penn. L. Rev. 709 (1995), was cited is this one:
The decryption process for Blowfish [8] is almost identical to the encryption process except the P-array values are reversed.
[8] sends you to my article. The problem is, I wasn't aware I knew much about the Blowfish cipher, or that I had ever written about it.
There must be some mistake? A month ago I emailed the authors to ask, but so far no answer.
Sadly, the height of coverage of the Florida primary election may be this report in the St. Pete Times, A view inside the Florida political circus.