Looks like we'll be doing some Vosberg v. Putney today.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Comments
- Dan Froomkin on The Case of the Capitol Police and the January 6 Near-Putsch
- Just me on The Case of the Capitol Police and the January 6 Near-Putsch
- C.E. Petit on Read it and Prepare to Weep
- Michael Froomkin on Restoring Multi-Row Tabs in FF 107
- Dan Riley on Coalition Government in the US House — It’s Not an Analogy, It’s a Strategy
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 2,780 other subscribers
Sounds a lot like you’re teaching Elements, Michael!
Seriously, I applaud the “long, hard slog” through a classic case as an introduction to a first-year course. For many years, I would spend the first two-to-three sessions of Contracts on Hurley v. Eddingfield. And when cranky senior colleagues began complaining about my “lack of coverage” — and pressing those complaints during the tenure process — I responded in the only way I know: by devoting an additional week to Hurley. Enjoy!