Category Archives: Law: Privacy

Is That a Razr in Your Pocket, or is the FBI Glad to See Me?

Be afraid.

FBI taps cell phone mic as eavesdropping tool. The FBI appears to have begun using a novel form of electronic surveillance in criminal investigations: remotely activating a mobile phone’s microphone and using it to eavesdrop on nearby conversations.

The technique is called a “roving bug,” and was approved by top U.S. Department of Justice officials for use against members of a New York organized crime family who were wary of conventional surveillance techniques such as tailing a suspect or wiretapping him.

The surveillance technique came to light in an opinion published this week by U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan. He ruled that the “roving bug” was legal because federal wiretapping law is broad enough to permit eavesdropping even of conversations that take place near a suspect’s cell phone.

Kaplan’s opinion said that the eavesdropping technique “functioned whether the phone was powered on or off.” Some handsets can’t be fully powered down without removing the battery; for instance, some Nokia models will wake up when turned off if an alarm is set.

It seems the bugging software can downloaded remotely, without the cops ever touching the phone. And once the handset’s software is compromised, even pushing the “off” button won’t stop it from acting as a bug.

The U.S. Commerce Department’s security office warns that “a cellular telephone can be turned into a microphone and transmitter for the purpose of listening to conversations in the vicinity of the phone.” An article in the Financial Times last year said mobile providers can “remotely install a piece of software on to any handset, without the owner’s knowledge, which will activate the microphone even when its owner is not making a call.”

Nextel and Samsung handsets and the Motorola Razr are especially vulnerable to software downloads that activate their microphones, said James Atkinson, a counter-surveillance consultant who has worked closely with government agencies. “They can be remotely accessed and made to transmit room audio all the time,” he said. “You can do that without having physical access to the phone.”

J. Edgar would have loved this one.

I wonder what the effects are on battery life, however: If my battery suddenly seems to die on me more quickly is that a sign I need a new one, or that I’m being bugged?

Memo to all lawyers: take the battery out of your cell phone when having sensitive conversations.

Posted in Law: Criminal Law, Law: Privacy | 3 Comments

Gen. Odom (Reagan NSA Chief) Pulls No Punches

I don't know what the Augusta (GA) Metro Spirit is exactly, but its national security blog landed an interview with Lt. Gen. William Odom (Ret.), Reagan's NSA chief speaks out. It's a doozy:

Retired general asks, What’s wrong with cutting and running?
By Corey Pein

Metro Spirit: What are your feelings on the NSA’s program of warrantless wiretapping of American citizens?

William Odom: It didn’t happen under my watch. And I’m still puzzled why somebody hasn’t tried to impeach the president for doing it. Any conservative in the United States who values his life [ought to be outraged]. In fact, the South seceded in defense of minority rights — why the hell have they forgotten them now? Ben Franklin said, “somebody who values security over liberty deserves neither.”

MS: What do you say to people, and there are plenty here in Augusta, who say that cutting and running from Iraq is traitorous act?

WO: Well, just tell ‘em they’re full of shit. They're traitors. You know what lemmings are? Yeah, they’re lemmings. We went to war for our enemies’ best interests. You ask those people why it makes sense that we went to war to advance the interests of Iran and Al Qaeda.

There's LOTS more where that came from. The guy reminds me of Barry Goldwater — calls them like he sees them, with no muffler…

Posted in Iraq, Law: Privacy | 3 Comments

Homeland Security Privacy Meeting in Miami Dec 6

DHS is having a meeting of its Data Privacy and Integrity Committee here in Miami and I am really really annoyed that I’m going to hve to miss this: DHS: Privacy Office – DHS Data Privacy and Integrity Committee Meeting Information

Privacy Office – DHS Data Privacy and Integrity Committee Meeting Information

The quarterly meeting of the DHS Data Privacy and Integrity Advisory Committee will be held on December 6, 2006 at:

Eden Roc Hotel
Mona Lisa Ballroom
4525 Collins Avenue
Miami Beach, FL 33140

Public Sessions

Mona Lisa Ballroom
8:00 a.m. – 11:15 a.m.
12:15 p.m. – 2:30 p.m.

Details of Meeting

Public Comments

2:00 p.m. – 2:30 p.m.

Registration and Attendance

Any member of the public who wishes to attend the public session is requested to provide his or her name by 2:00 p.m. EST, Friday, December 1, 2006, to:

The DHS Privacy Advisory Committee
The Privacy Office
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Washington, DC 20528

Email: privacycommittee@dhs.gov
Phone: 571-227-3813
Fax: 571-227-4171

Everyone who plans to attend is respectfully requested to be present and seated by 7:45 a.m. for the morning session and 12:00 p.m. for the afternoon session. Registration is requested to assist in the preparation of meeting materials and seating arrangements. Attendance information, including names of members of the public attending, are to be made public as part of the official meeting minutes.

Persons with disabilities who require special assistance are asked to indicate this in their admittance request, and are encouraged to identify anticipated special needs as early as possible.

Contact Information

The DHS Privacy Advisory Committee
The Privacy Office
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Washington, DC 20528

Email: privacycommittee@dhs.gov
Phone: 571-227-3813
Fax: 571-227-4171

I have to miss it because I will be in Sao Paulo for the second half of an ICANN meeting — it seems I’ve been reappointed, or re-sentenced (I’m not quite sure) to the ICANN NomCom.

If anyone goes — register by tomorrow — I’d love a report.

Posted in Law: Privacy, Talks & Conferences | Comments Off on Homeland Security Privacy Meeting in Miami Dec 6

Britons and Their Speed Cameras

I'm interested in surveillance and in privacy in public places. Here's an article about how Britons feel about one sort of public surveillance: they hate it. In addition to actually destroying a number of speed cameras, Britons are also trying to undermine them,

Cameras Catch Speeding Britons and Lots of Grief: Technology has moved on considerably since the 1990s, when the first speed cameras were installed in Britain. Now, in addition to the standard cameras that photograph the speeding cars’ license plates, there are cameras that can accurately photograph drivers’ faces — so that they cannot claim someone else was driving at the time — and cameras that work in teams, calculating average speeds along a stretch of road.

Of course, for every ingenious new camera, there is an ingenious new camera-thwarting device. These include constantly-updating G.P.S. equipment that alerts drivers to camera locations and a special material that, when sprayed on a license plate, is said to make it impervious to flash photographs.

There are also the low-tech methods of covering a license plate with mud or altering its letters with black electrical tape

Posted in Law: Privacy, UK | 1 Comment

Privacy Illusions

As the world is abuz with discussion of AOL’s boneheaded release of identifiable customer searches (see here for an example of what can be found) here’s an only tangentially relevant animated cartoon about government eavesdropping. Whether you should be more worried about public or private snooping is a very tough question. And ultimately maybe not a meaningful one, as the government can buy or demand private records…

I was interviewed my NPR’s Marketplace about the AOL fiasco this morning, so you may find me on your radio somewhere. [Update: they used a small soundbite.]

Posted in Law: Privacy | Comments Off on Privacy Illusions

No-Spy Video

Progress Now has an amusing No-Spy Video. Catchy tune, ok film. Important issue.

Posted in Civil Liberties, Law: Privacy | Comments Off on No-Spy Video