Author Archives: Michael Froomkin

What (Pre) Law Students Should Know

It isn’t going to win me many friend with students, but I have to say that Yair Listokin is basically right: Statistics Should be Mandatory for Law Students. I’ve long believed that statistics should be a near-prerequisite for law school, and if you haven’t had before law school we should offer it for credit, and encourage — maybe even require — students to take it.

Meanwhile, if you’re an undergraduate thinking of going to law school, may I point you to my FAQ about going to law school, which for many years has included this advice:

If you really want to be a good lawyer, I don’t personally recommend
majoring in anything directly related to law as an undergraduate, or even
taking courses in
it. That includes “Juvenile Justice”. Colleges always teach the stuff “wrong”
from the point of view of a lawyer – maybe right from the point of view
of a cop or probation officer or something, but wrong from the point of
view of someone who needs to work with law rather than recite it. So you
will start out behind the other students since you will have to ‘unlearn’
what you think you know. Really.

Far, far, better to major in something that teaches you about the world:
history, economics, literature, math or even art. You will get all the
law you need in law school – why waste college getting a 3rd-rate version
of it? Why not get the stuff that makes you a well informed person, and
thus a much better lawyer in the long run.

The only rule that over-rides the one above is: major in what you like
best. Because ultimately you will get the best grades in what you like
best, and grades count! A lot. A whole lot. Especially if you are not going
to college at a very high prestige Ivy League or similar school.

If possible – it’s not essential – I’d try to take the following courses
at some point regardless of what you major in:

  • two semesters of economics
  • at least one Intro to Philosophy and/or Political Philosophy
  • as much US history as you can stand (law is about context, and precedents
    must be understood in the context of their times)
  • a course that covers the structure of the US political/governmental system

Big bonus points if you can manage a course in basic statistics.

I also **very** highly recommend you subscribe to a first-rate national
newspaper and read it every day (your college may have a student discount
deal). You will learn essential information about the political and legal
system without even realizing how much you are learning. The New York Times
is the best, but if your interests are more business oriented then the
Wall St. Journal or the Financial Times are ok too. Local papers don’t
really have enough national and international news to cut it.

Get the above under your belt and you are really ready for law school!

 

Incidentally, UM Law has a very good page for people thinking about law school, 28
Critical Questions about law school
. (There used to be 29 of them, but one seems to have gone non-critical.) They even give the answers, which shows it is about law school rather than being like law school…

Posted in Law School | 8 Comments

More Bush Admin Security Theater

Some Ships Get Coast Guard Tip Before Searches.
I would understand this better if someone were being bribed. But 24 hours notice before searching ships for bombs, terrorists, and contraband generally, as a policy?

Posted in National Security | 3 Comments

Lamont Clears Hurdle to Get on Ballot

He needed 15% of the convention delegates to force a primary for the Senate seat now held by Sen. Joe Lieberman (R-Ct), and despite serious arm-twisting by the city machines, Ned Lamont got a third of the votes. The party discipline was stronger in big towns, plus some of them used winner-take-all to allocate delegates, which I suspect explains why small towns provided most of Lamont’s vote — and means this total under-represents his true strength (which will only grow).

So the primary is on. Lamont could actually win it, too, although I suppose the odds are still against him.

Posted in Politics: US: 2006 Election | Comments Off on Lamont Clears Hurdle to Get on Ballot

‘How to Cheat Good’

I give take-home exams frequently, and a thankfully small number of my students could probably profit from reading Alex Halavais's wicked valedictory essay, posted as he leaves teaching1 at least temporarily for pastures new: How to cheat good.

Fortunately, the type of student who needs this advice probably isn't reading here.


1 Update: Er, seems I was wrong about that, as explained in the comments…

Posted in Law School | 1 Comment

Dumb Move

Dan Hunter posts on (confused) threats he’s received from the proprietor of an online game whose press releases Dan had the temerity to suggest might be slightly inflated.

As one of the commentators to his post noted, sending this sort of threat to a tenured law professor and/or his Dean, is “like playing chicken with a freight train.”

(Incidentally, guys, oral defamation is slander, written defamation is libel. Get your threats right.)

Posted in Virtual Worlds | Comments Off on Dumb Move

Link-o-Rama

Quickies. Because I’m distracted.

  • The most important post of the day. I will write about this if I can find the time/energy, but go read it.
  • Officer Friendly (not)
  • Outrage fatigue (On discovering that people in government who tell the truth get forced out of their jobs: “It’s like reading that, once again, the freeways are crowded this morning.”)
  • Our Air Force isn’t only a home to religious intolerance verging on bigotry, it’s headed by four-star suspects
  • One thing that has surprised me about Wesley Clark is how poor his online presence is. I’d have thought he’d be making a bigger bid for the online activists. Now it begins: he’s speaking to Daily Kos convention. I hope they chide him about his web site.
  • Establishment Democrats support Leiberman. despite his routine practice of putting a knife into the party’s rigbs. Real Democrats don’t.
  • Republicans understand about party discipline: there will be strong right-wing primary opposition for an only somewhat conservative Republican Fl. state senator who recently voted his conscience (and his district) scuttling Jeb Bush’s latest attempt to undo the Florida constitution’s class-size amendment. That amendment, which Jeb hates and has plotted to undermine for years, caps the sizes of public school classes (and thus creates a need to actually pay for schools!). And polls show voters (but not Republican primary voters, maybe?) love it.
  • Ranking Law Reviews is a high-quality effort, but is the game worth the candle when everything is online and searchable?
Posted in Etc | 3 Comments