Some Ships Get Coast Guard Tip Before Searches.
I would understand this better if someone were being bribed. But 24 hours notice before searching ships for bombs, terrorists, and contraband generally, as a policy?
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- It is interesting how Rubio manages to be more despicable than Vance since Rubio has actual power to wield to do horrible things, but because Vance talks nasty and sneers he looks worse. September 6, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- New post September 5, 2026 Sandieglo
- NY Bar complaint filed against AG Todd Blanche for disobeying a court order in #Epstein files case. cmarmitage.substack.com/p/todd-blanc... September 4, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- My theory is different: every time Trump buys something, like a casino, he then loses money on it. So he thinks that buying foreign things causes us to lose money too September 4, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- And every time you think he can't possibly go lower.... you're wrong! September 4, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Recent Comments
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 53 other subscribers
What’s the applicable coastal waters limit? 3 miles or 12? The concerns of the shipowners over delays could be reduced if the Coastguard could inspect on the high seas, or inside the 200-mile economic zone. Oh, you would need a multilateral treaty or lots of bilateral ones to do it, or the casual disregard for international law that this Administration has made its mascot. But how much resistance could Liberia or Panama put up to serious US pressure on the issue?
Well, no, not as a policy. At the discretion of local officials, based on information available to them. Of course what we need is more micromanaged security policy from DC (except, of course, when that’s exactly what we don’t need, and we’ll decide after the fact which was the appropriate choice).
It is a bit ironic that the same folks who would defend the choice to shut down a program that, according to experts, would have prevented the 9/11 attacks because the program was too aggressive now want to pretend they’re security hawks.
I don’t see what’s odd about being against waste of time, money and effort.