Author Archives: Michael Froomkin

Stereotypes on Parade

As a long-time Francophile married to a Brit I am of course appalled at this display of European stereotypes that is making the rounds by email. But it's funny anyway.

Terrorism Alert!

The British are feeling the pinch in relation to recent bombings and have raised their security level from “Miffed” to “Peeved.” Soon, though, security levels may be raised yet again to “Irritated” or even “A Bit Cross.” Londoners have not been “A Bit Cross” since the blitz in 1940, when tea supplies all but ran out. Terrorists have been recategorized from “Tiresome” to a “Bloody Nuisance.”

The last time the British issued a “Bloody Nuisance” warning level was during the great fire of 1666.

Also, the French Government announced yesterday that it has raised its terror alert level from “Run” to “Hide.” The only two higher levels in France are “Surrender” and “Collaborate.” The rise was precipitated by a recent fire that destroyed France's white flag factory, effectively paralysing the country's military capability.

It's not only the English and French that are on a heightened level of alert. Italy has increased the alert level from “Shout Loudly and Excitedly” to “Elaborate Military Posturing.” Two more levels remain: “Ineffective Combat Operations” and “Change Sides.”

The Germans also increased their alert state from “Disdainful Arrogance” to “Dress in Uniform and Sing Marching Songs.” They also have two higher levels: “Invade a Neighbour” and “Lose.”

Belgians, on the other hand, are all on holiday, as usual, and the only threat they are worried about is NATO pulling out of Brussels.

Actually, I'm only publishing this because I believe in affirmative action for pan-European jokes that include smaller countries.

Posted in Completely Different | 3 Comments

DEFCON Badges

I'm not at YearlyKOS (although I wish I were); and I'm not at Defcon either. I've never been able to justify going to Defcon, although it sounds fun. This year in addition to the program, the Defcon ID badge looks really interesting.

Last year's badge was a fine piece of round circuit board with the DEFCON SmileSkull and Crossbones cut into it, a bunch of circuitry, two lit LED eyes, a single watch battery, and a toggle switch to make the eyes blink in sequence. If you were really clever, you could hack the code in the badge to blink out your own secret messages …

…The sucker has a Freescale MC9S08QG8 microcontroller and contains a 5 column by 19 row matrix of LEDs to allow user-customizable scrolling text messages. The default message is I (heart) DEFCON 15. Power source is a pair of lithium coin cell batteries.

Touch the top SmileSkull icon and it turns things on. It’s not a clicky switch, it’s a touch switch – major improvement from last year. A second touch control under the rotary dial symbol (and there’s one to explain to your kids about) allows one to type in a customized message.

If that wasn’t enough, the LEDs are also programmed to deliver a persistence-of-vision (POV) secret message if you trigger the proper mode then wave it around in front of your eyes in one direction, kinda like those hand-held trick LED signs people were having fun with a few years ago.

So many conferences, so little time (& money…)

Posted in Talks & Conferences | 1 Comment

How Much Is Enough?

Dreamhost is unveiling a new service with an unusual pricing model. DreamHost Private Servers will provide CPU and RAM a la carte. $1.00/month for each 10 MB RAM and 10 MhZ CPU, protected, on a shared server (there's also a burst mode, but it's not guaranteed). Unfortunately, you buy them together (I need CPU more than RAM).

So, how much is enough to run a blog?

Posted in Discourse.net | Comments Off on How Much Is Enough?

Something Nice

I haven't seen David Saltzman in years, maybe not since shortly after college, although I'd hear about him from mutual friends from time to time. We've exchanged the occasional email, which I suppose put me in his address book.

Then, a while back, I started to get cc's of general emails. They were sober stuff: cancer. Bad cancer.

Not today.

Dear Friends,

This week has been filled by tests at Johns Hopkins confirming that my cancer has, at least temporarily, gone into nearly complete remission! This is the best news I have had since being diagnosed in late 2006 with malignant bile duct cancer (metastatic cholangiocarcinoma), a disease that kills half its victims within three months. After seven months of grueling chemotherapy and a larger number of surgical and endoscopic procedures, the images taken by PET, CT, X-ray and MRI are all in accord that the tumors have shrunk to a “subradiographic” point where they are smaller than grains of rice, though still present. The doctors can't find the cancer because there aren't enough tumor cells left in one place or in total.

In equally good news, I can finally breathe deeply without pain or coughing. You cannot imagine what a relief this is after six months of ever-shallower, more desperate breathing. …

My symptoms at this point stem entirely from the chemotherapy, not the cancer. I continue to find this oddly liberating, because I choose to undergo chemo and I can reason with an oncologist… but not with a cancer. Since chemotherapy agents are designed on purpose to be as poisonous as possible without quite killing the patient, and I encouraged my oncologist to cut it very close, the symptoms have been brutal.

The chemo has left me a smashed shipwreck of a body: battered, scarred, impossibly drained, and barely holding together. Until a few days ago, just climbing a flight of stairs took me to the limit of my endurance. Some months I spend more time at Johns Hopkins than at home. At least the nurses have stopped wearing burkhas around me. The face masks, gowns and gloves were a bit unnerving.

The sky now looks bright again. Admittedly, this respite is likely to be just the eye of the hurricane before the cancer comes blasting back, but for some time ahead the weather looks to be spectacularly and undeservedly clear.

There is a good illustration of the concept if you search for “routine procedure” at cartoonbank.com

Please understand that this is just a temporary victory. Chemotherapy cannot cure me of metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, since the survival charts taper to zero by twenty-four months. Facing no prospect of therapies beyond toxic chemicals is crushing. I wish there were some way to connect this rare cancer to the most modern forefronts of medicine, perhaps as a genetics problem or an opportunity for an immunotherapy (cancer vaccine), but there isn't any evident path on a timeframe available to me.

Nevertheless, this remarkable degree of remission has reset the clock to one helluva good starting point for that inevitable day when one of the cancer's stem cells evolves resistance to the chemotherapy's toxic charms and starts proliferating wildly. Then my oncologist will try out a new chemo recipe and the battle will be rejoined. Unless he runs out of chemo bullets first, I will survive to fight a third round. And so on for a fourth round.

Which brings us to the present. Today's news sets a new high-water mark for the fight against this cancer, though my health is terrible. Seven months of intensive chemo have left me riddled by nausea, with pathetic endurance, poor short-term memory and a miniscule attention span, but I am finally free from pain, and day by day I am starting to get stronger.

In other words, I can now fight this disease from a position of microscopic tumor volume, negligible cancer pain, and increasing stamina (aside from the chemo's horrific side effects). This is the right place to be starting the next round of battle against a malignancy biding its time as it accumulates mutations, waiting to evade the chemo agents and start proliferating wildly.

I plan to enjoy every day of the improving health, spending cherished time with my family and friends …

Winning this first victorious battle in an ultimately losing war has been the hardest time of my life so far, with only family and strong friendships keeping me above water. I am told that my loopiness from pain killers made dealing with me a tribulation at times, hard though that may be to believe. Beth and I appreciate the support and understanding more than words can convey. As for Joel and Michael, they are thrilled to have their father starting, however slowly, to get back onto his feet.

Consequently, Beth and I have decided take the boys to Israel Sunday, leaving anything work-related behind. We needed to do something dramatic. From the questions I get interrogated with, one would think that airlines and hotels had never encountered somebody making arrangements precipitously, at the last minute. They should see my cooking.

Let's hope the news will always be this good.

Let's.

Posted in Science/Medicine | 1 Comment

Cool Travel Phone (But You Can’t Have One)

This Spice D-80 Dual Mode Handset looks like a cool GSM phone for traveling with both a domestic and a foreign SIM. Pity it's not a flip phone…and that it's only going to be sold in India.

I think US carriers will be forced to unlock all their phones and accept some competition…eventually. Maybe some day they'll even start selling phones like this. (But in the long run we are all dead.)

Posted in Sufficiently Advanced Technology | 4 Comments

The ABA’s Proposed New Standard: Predicting Effects

Who are the losers under the ABA's proposed new bar pass standard?

Otherwise Occupied, New ABA law school standard interpretation may kill 5 CA schools does some calculations, and even attempts to figure out second-order effects,

The end result: As many as five current ABA-approved law schools could lose their accreditations. Four schools (Golden Gate University School of Law, Thomas Jefferson School of Law, Whittier Law School, and Western State University College of Law) would immediately fail to meet this standard.

But the fallout may be greater. The loss of those schools bumps the ABA passage rate up, which causes some collateral damage, taking out Chapman University School of Law:

Interestingly, some commentators see the US Department of Education's pressure on the ABA to enact a bar pass standard as an attempt to gut the ABA's support of affirmative action,

Michael Dorf, The Bush Department of Education Tries to Gut Grutter Below the Radar Screen

[The Dep't of Education's] pressure on the ABA is designed to make it hard for law schools to pursue diversity, not to make it voluntary. Under that pressure, the ABA now proposes to make bar passage rates an element of accreditation. [… ] Officially, the Department of Education and the ABA (under pressure) are concerned about the quality of education, but this is pretty clearly also a means of limiting affirmative action at non-elite law schools. (The bar passage rates at elite law schools are sufficiently high that admissions policies would be largely unaffected by the new rule.) Students with weaker numerical qualifications coming into law school fail the bar in larger numbers than those with stronger ones; by requiring higher bar passage rates at the back end, the new standard would limit the ability of law schools to admit students with weaker numbers (but with other qualifications, including their contributions to student body diversity) at the front end.

The proposed changes are objectionable in at least four ways. First, bar passage rates are a very crude measure of the quality of a legal education. Second, to the extent that the issue is consumer protection, simply publicizing bar passage rates should be sufficient to warn prospective students that admission into law school as a 1L does not guarantee admission into the profession after graduation. Third, under the pressure of US News rankings, law schools already have ample incentive to pay attention to their bar passage rates, so the pressure of the new standard would only be felt at those schools that fare poorly in those rankings and/or have made a commitment to taking a chance on students with weaker numbers notwithstanding the price they thereby pay in the rankings. So long as students know what they're getting into (see “Second”), there is no good reason to limit schools' flexibility to pursue such an approach to admissions. And fourth, whether accreditation ought to turn on bar passage rate should ultimately be a matter for the judgment of the legal profession and legal academy, not the ideologues of the Bush administration.

Vernellia Randall, ABA Proposal Threatens Diversity In Legal Education,

Contrary to the implication in this statement that the proposed standard takes a school’s mission into account, and will be receptive to arguments about diversity, the proposal issued by the Council rejected the suggestion that they take a school’s mission into account in determining compliance. Instead, they inserted language about consideration of “student populations served” in a section of the proposal that only applies to schools that are in compliance.

This story is receiving some play in other media outlets. It may mislead individuals and groups concerned about diversity into a false sense of security about the impact of the proposal. As the Patton Study showed, the proposal will put almost all of the diversity-friendly schools out-of-compliance and worsen the state of minority enrollment.

Previous posts:

Posted in Law School | 2 Comments