Author Archives: Michael Froomkin

Political Dysfunction on a Cosmic Scale

alicublog writes:

It is worth noting that today's session was mainly about a plan for withdrawal from an occupation which is disapproved by citizens of the occupying country as well as those of the occupied country. But neither the Democratic leadership nor the Republican Administration perceive a political benefit to themselves from a quick exit. So they talk about timetables and drawdown and leave it to their operatives to spin the analysis to their advantage.

I found my way there because Kevin Drum says it's one of the funniest blogs and I wanted a laugh.

Myself, I think you need a pretty bleak sense of humor to find this funny.

Posted in Iraq | 2 Comments

Every Law School Needs One of These

Via Boing Boing comes news of a Voice-stress ice-cream dispenser that increases portions for the miserable:

Demitrios Kargotis unveiled his Mr Whippy machine at the Ars Technica festival in Linz. It's a self-serve frozen custard machine that doles out portion sizes based on the amount of misery it detects in a voice-stress analysis. The sadder you are, the more ice-cream you get.

I think every law school should have one of these!

Posted in Law School | 1 Comment

Violence at the Iraq War Hearing

This has all the markings of a very strange story: Rev. Lennox Yearwood Arrested at Petraeus Hearing.

I hope we get to hear more about what exactly happened; certainly the first, perhaps one-sided, report is disturbing; on the other hand, the video is less clear-cut — after being singled out for some reason and denied admission after waiting in line (could it really be for wearing a button that said “I love the people of Iraq?”) did Rev. Yearwood really lunge for the door saying “I will not be arrested”? And even so, does that justify breaking his leg?

Rev. Yearwood is the same person who recently won a stay or delay in his case against the Air Force which had tried to honorably (not dishonorably) discharge him as a chaplain; according to his supporters, his offense was preaching against the war. And indeed, when he got an opportunity to preach at Andrews Air Force Base, “the message that I preached was 'Who Would Jesus Bomb?'”—not the best way to be popular on the base, I'd imagine.

I spent some time trying to find out if there's a Senate rule about what you can wear to a committee hearing, and whether buttons are prohibited. Couldn't find anything. Links to facts most welcomed.

Posted in Civil Liberties | 3 Comments

Numerology Fans Take Note

The ultimate pointless rating.

This site is certified 36% EVIL by the Gematriculator

Posted in Discourse.net | 3 Comments

Art from Annoyance

It Came From Airport Security, the anthology announced about a year ago of fiction based on new security measures at airports, is now available (and is forwardthinkingly licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5).

Posted in Civil Liberties | Comments Off on Art from Annoyance

Lots We Still Don’t Know About B-52 Live Nuclear Bomb Incident

I wrote the other day about the weird incident in which a B-52 flew over the US with five or six live nuclear bombs. (See My That’s a Big Sabre You Are Rattling There)

Strangely, the incident was mostly a one-day wonder to our press, which is now busy worrying about whatever it usually worries about — although you might think that misloading five (or was it six?) bombs — each ten times as destructive as the bomb the US dropped on Hiroshima — might just maybe spur a follow-up story or two.

That’s certainly what the good folks at Nieman Watchdog (where my brother is an editor) think, and I commend Nieman Watchdog > Ask This > A B-52 with six armed nuclear missiles flew over the U.S. for 3-1/2 hours. What’s the story here? to you for a recap of the facts as we know them. And it’s striking how little we know about certain key questions, which Nieman Watchdog thoughtfully provides for any reporter needing a little inspiration:

There are many questions the media should ask about this event. Without answers to them, no one can make positive recommendations for preventing such mishaps in the future.

Questions

Q. Why and for what ostensible purpose were these nuclear weapons taken to Barksdale AFB?

Q. How long was it before the error was discovered?

Q. How many mistakes and errors were made, and how many needed to be made, for this incident to happen. How many and which security protocols were overlooked and how many and which safety procedures were bypassed or ignored?

Q. How many other nuclear command and control non-observations of procedure have there been? Is there in the U.S. government a consolidated data base of such incidents so that they could be counted?  Who is responsible for such a data base?  A report for the Center for Defense Information some time ago said President Kennedy was told in 1961 that there had been 60 U.S. nuclear weapons accidents. How many nuclear mishaps have there been since 1961?

Q. What is the U.S. Congress going to do to better oversee U.S. nuclear command and control? Will there be an independent investigation of this mishap?

Q. How does this incident relate to concern for reliability of control over nuclear weapons and nuclear materials in Russia, Pakistan, and elsewhere.

Q. As some news reports suggest, does the Bush administration have plans to attack Iran with nuclear weapons? What does the U.S. Congress know about this, and have they even asked to be briefed?

The last question made me laugh.

Posted in The Media | 6 Comments