Author Archives: Michael Froomkin

MoDo Does SoBe’s Canyon Ranch

Maureen Dowd, the New York Times's drama queen of frivolity, takes a vacation in SoBe and pens Canyon Ranch in Miami Beach – What Recession?.

Choice bits:

To find out if spa guilt is rampant, Alessandra and I spent a long weekend at the new Canyon Ranch in the old Carillon Hotel in Miami Beach, which bills itself as the first condo, luxury hotel and wellness spa “of its kind!”

Like other spas, Canyon Ranch hopes to alleviate spa guilt by stressing the holistic benefits of “a deeper wellness,” “a healing energy,” “a Shamanic journey” — rather than simple exfoliating, waxing and cycling. It boasts a sensual 70,000-square-foot spa “where body meets soul” (while money leaves wallet).

But wait, it gets better.

I’d seen someone execute a daring escape from a spa once. Many years ago, when she was single, Nicole Miller, the pretty red-headed clothing designer, had broken out one night from the puritanical Golden Door in Escondido, Calif., and shown up the next morning with a cute guy and a satisfied smile.

At some spas, going AWOL produces a Mother Superior scowl from management. Here, the easygoing staff seems to expect it, even enable it. There’s a hair salon that will wash the massage oil out of your hair, give you a great blow dry and reasonably priced sun streaks, and send you on your way out into the warm night with some cheap dangly earrings.

I called the only person I knew in Miami and asked him to bust us out of there on Saturday night. Fortunately, he was chief of police, my pal John Timoney, so the great escape from Canyon Ranch went flawlessly in his white getaway S.U.V.

Gosh, that sounds familiar. Where have I heard something about Chief Timoney and his SUV? Could it be The Lexus Leprechaun in which the New Times wrote about his unethical and illegal acceptance of a free SUV from a local Lexus dealer? Could it be Miami's Top Cop Breaks the Law in which they described his stonewall when asked to testify about it? Or maybe is was when he had to buy the car at its $54K sticker price? Or that his ethics case was settled for a weeks pay and a $500 fine — which isn't much, but was the largest ethics fine in the history of the county (don't say it)? Or that there were suggestions the Chief might have committed perjury in a sworn statement in the case?

Not that MoDo lets on any hint of all that in her article. And why should she? The Chief took her somewhere nice:

Chief Timoney took us over to the most over-the-top spot in this over-the-top city: the leopard-skin-swathed, stained-glass-filled, Medusa-head-branded Versace mansion, a testament to what one man accomplished by reducing antiquity to a throw pillow.

The mansion, Casa Casuarina, had been turned into a private club but is now open to the public, with a restaurant on its patio that started out in September, and tours of the mannerist upstairs suites. We had a drink in the ornate bar with the owner, Peter Loftin, a mountain of Southern charm, a retired telecommunications mogul who bought the house for $19 million in 2000. Then we ate a sampling from the kitchen: a mound of succulent Kobe beef, fried pork belly, sea scallops with osetra caviar, black grouper, blue prawns cooked at the table on a salt block, foie gras with a riesling-pineapple-coriander emulsion and Meyer lemon tart and crushed amaretti mousse with vanilla-bean meringue, washed down by Champagne (Krug, Clos de Ambonnay 1995), at one of the outdoor tables under a tent by the elaborately tiled pool.

… did the NYT (or the Chief) really buy a champagne that costs $3,500 / bottle at retail? Somebody, or two somebodies, seems seriously overpaid. But then the Chief has long been known for high living and bashing into protesters and others. And it seems he makes $4,300 per week, so I guess he can afford it.

Having been fed and watered (no word about whether “Alessandra” came along), MoDo went back to work:

I had a massage where a woman walked on my back while holding on to rails in the ceiling — not relaxing — and another where I was rubbed down by a cute young Latino massage therapist wielding a mushroom-shaped ball wrapped in linen.

Aren't you glad that Maureen Dowd had a good time? And, in case you are wondering, we never do find out if “spa guilt” is “rampant”. Perhaps next time.

Posted in Miami | 1 Comment

People Unclear on the Concept

Scott Horton, Why Two Bush Appointees Are Refusing to Leave, describes the incredible story of U.S. Attorneys Mary Beth Buchanan of Pittsburgh and Alice Martin of Birmingham — both highly partisan and dubiously ethical — who although they serve at the pleasure of the President refuse to hew to custom by tendering resignations, and either think they can bluff Team Obama into not firing them or see some partisan value in being fired rather than going quietly.

It had better not work. There is a place for holdover US Attorneys — when they're really good and genuinely non-partisan. Patrick Fitzgerald, for example. But ladies, you're no Patrick Fitzgerald.

Posted in Law: Ethics, Politics: The Party of Sleaze | Comments Off on People Unclear on the Concept

Countdown to the Restoration

3

Posted in Politics: US | Comments Off on Countdown to the Restoration

President Shalala on the Recession/Depression: “Overreacting is an important strategy in a crisis”

UM's President Donna Shalala has written a remarkable letter to the UM community,

Some random thoughts before a long weekend:

Overreacting is an important strategy in a crisis. My mind-set is that we always have to do more than necessary during any kind of financial crisis.

In this one, cash is king, so we have asked everyone to eliminate all unnecessary spending—from snacks, to paper, to travel. It is the little things that add up to big dollars. We will sit on the dollars so we don’t have to borrow to pay for necessities and can preserve our reserves.

It’s really not confusing. I’m sure most of you are doing the same thing in your personal budgets.

We can do this. Our goal is to protect your job, our core programs, and continue to get better. We can do this—yes we can!

Concerning yesterday’s jet crash in New York’s Hudson River—one of our students was on that plane. He will graduate in May because he had an angel on his wing and a courageous pilot in the cockpit, and the New York/New Jersey community had an emergency plan that worked.

On the occasion of Monday’s celebration of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday, I would like to share my favorite speech. It is one few have ever read—the address Dr. King delivered in acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964. Please click here to access this brilliant speech, which rings every bit as true 45 years later.

As usual, send me your ideas and have a safe and happy weekend.

Overreacting is an important strategy in a crisis. It may even be true; there's a real chance that Pres. Shalala's attitude, and the cost-cutting she's imposing on all of us, is the best policy for the University's long-term flourishing. But the collective action consequence of multiple overreactions to a recession or other financial shock is a depression. The University has basically frozen its considerable construction plans for the next 6-12 months. That will have substantial knock-on effects on the local community. We're all being asked in various ways to economize. It could be much worse of course, and may yet be; I am deeply grateful for tenure, and worry for my friends and neighbors without it.

Clearly, one of the biggest challenges for the Obama financial team will be to turn this psychology around; “fear itself” is emergent and palpable when it prompts even the usually indomitable Shalala to urge us to overreact — something only a step or two from panic.

Posted in Econ & Money: Mortgage Mess, U.Miami | 4 Comments

Countdown to the Restoration

4

Posted in Politics: US | Comments Off on Countdown to the Restoration

Thoughts on the Cabinet With Special Reference to Eric Holder

In Salon, Joe Conason offers his take on The real reason Bill Clinton pardoned Marc Rich. It's by far the most interesting thing I've read about the Holder nomination/confirmation process.

By and large Obama's appointees are smart-to-brilliant technocrats. A few of the nominations seem inspired — General Eric Shinseki to the VA, Steven Chu to Energy, Janet Napolitano to DHS. A few seem odd or high-risk — Dennis Blair as DNI, Hillary Clinton to State, Mary Schapiro to the SEC (huh?).

And then there is Eric Holder. Very smart. Very hard-working. Very experienced. Perfect for the Attorney General job in normal times. But these are not normal times: the AG in the coming administration is going to be faced with a number of unusual challenges involving cleaning up the messes of his predecessors. For example, and just off the top of my head:

  • Dealing with inescapable evidence of war crimes by members of the Bush administration
  • Dealing with strong evidence of perjury by members of the Bush administration
  • Cleaning up the mess in the Justice Department caused by politicized hiring
  • Restoring confidence in the politicized US Attorney's office — and re-examining possibly politicized prosecutions (and exonerations)
  • Reviewing shoddy and in some cases evil (and secret) opinions of the OLC
  • Prosecuting thieves who pillaged some of the other agencies and especially the war effort in Iraq

And lots more besides. These tasks require not just a technocrat, but someone with a strong moral compass, maybe even the capacity to feel outrage. Is that Holder? Some accounts suggest it could be. Others, focusing particularly on his involvement in the Marc Rich pardon, suggest it isn't always.

Conason's account of how the pardon came to be — a response to intense foreign pressure, a bargaining chip in the peace process — suggests that there might have been a reason why even a person of strong principles could have favored the deal. That gives me some hope. Hope is not a plan, but it's something.

Note: I give little weight one way or the other the Obama proto-administration's statements soft-peddling the chances of war crime/torture prosecutions. An administration planning on investigations with an eye to possible prosecutions would, if it were smart, say exactly what Obama has been saying now. A public posture of skepticism pays three related dividends:

  1. Signaling, prior to Inauguration Day, that prosecutions are unlikely reduces the chances of preemptive lame-duck pardons.
  2. Suggesting prosecutions are unwanted removes any defense of vendetta/political interference were there to be a trial.
  3. Suggesting prosecutions are unwelcome allows a hypothetical future Obama to allow the prosecutions to go forward more in sorrow than in anger, 'due to the overwhelming evidence'.

I'm not saying that I think this is in fact what they are planning; if you asked me, the odds are they actually mean what they say. Which is why the extent to which Holder is a man of steely principle as well as a great lawyer and an über-technocrat is so important.

Posted in Law: Everything Else | Comments Off on Thoughts on the Cabinet With Special Reference to Eric Holder