US Senate: either Grayson (line 15) or Pam Keith (line 16) |
Circuit Court Group 9: Jason Edward Bloch (line 80) Group 34: Renee Gordon (line 83) Group 52: Carol “Jodie” Breece (line 87) Group 66: Robert Joshua Luck (line 90) Group 74: George “Jorge” A Sarduy (line 93)County Court Group 5: Milena Abreu (line 94) Group 7: Ed Newman (line 97) Group 15: Linda Luce (line 99) Group 35: Wendell Graham (line 100)YES on Amendment 4 (line 300) |
|---|
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- Jotwell Torts: Nora Freeman Engstrom, Immunity Run Amok: Section 230 and the Distortion of Tort Law, JOTWELL (July 8, 2026) (reviewing Dominic Roschival, A Shield for Whom? The Disastrous Hidden Toll of Section 230 on Children, 94 U. Cin. L. Rev. 257 (2025)), torts.jotwell.com/immunity-run.... July 8, 2026 Jotwell
- Just using version numbers avoids tempting the word deities. July 7, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Save a new version every 10 minutes. It's the only way. July 7, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Please post the occasional update for your worried fans. July 7, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Jotwell Techlaw: Ari Waldman, How Algorithms Make Exceptions, JOTWELL (July 7, 2026) (reviewing Barbara Kiviat, Sara Sternberg Greene, & Hesu Yoon, Exceptions in the Algorithmic Age: Evidence from the Case of Tenant Screening, 131 Am. J. Soc. 868 (2026)), cyber.jotwell.com/how-algorith.... July 7, 2026 Jotwell
Recent Comments
- Emily Brown on Introduction
- KK Ho on Introduction
- Michael on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Mulalira Faisal Umar on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Michael on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 51 other subscribers
Thank you for doing a great public service illuminating the judicial elections. It mostly aligns with my friends’ views in the legal community whom I respect highly.
I will take issue with your reverence toward SaveDade. It’s lost a lot of its integrity in the last few years. This organization’s leadership has a very disturbing practice of favoring candidates who hire certain consultants. It’s cronyism at best, pay-to-play at worst.
If SaveDade’s leadership isn’t careful, their endorsements will become worthless and their claim as being champions of equality will only illicit cynical laughs.