This is soooo weird: Krebs on Security, Lorem Ipsum: Of Good & Evil, Google & China.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- John Marshall doesn't get above the fold? June 10, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Hell of a speech. Great on the issues. Passionate. Great digs ("Susan Collins: her last town hall was when I was in 8th grade") Collins as the architect of the repeal of Roe and buddy of the Epstein class. Much about him to worry about, but he's now our son of a bitch. m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ovj0... June 10, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Yikes. Time to take this much more seriously. June 10, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Former intelligence analyst here: this will 100% be abused by US intelligence services cooperating with US law enforcement. If they claim you have protections, they're lying. June 9, 2026 Jake Williams
- Fails to disprove the hypothesis they want to make us all unsafe. June 8, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Recent Comments
- KK Ho on Introduction
- Michael on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Mulalira Faisal Umar on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Michael on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
- Just me on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 51 other subscribers
I think the explanation is quite simple.
That text, in it’s full version, is used in (among many other places) Latex typesetting software, which is used by all kinds of people that might be writing things about Nato or the Internet. When used, you often will make mock documents, fill it out with that text to see how they look, etc. Then you add in your REAL text as needed. I have numerous examples of this on my computer that I’ve used over the years.
It is 100% conceivable, if not inevitable, that examples of the above-described before and after, have been scanned by Google. maybe they were posted on line. Maybe they were emailed. Maybe they were in an on-line how-to page for typesetting. Maybe maybe maybe.
Then Google’s autonomous, apparently self-teaching software linked a default text to some completed documents and “learned” how to translate that text – leading to the odd results you cite.
The specific details are unknown, but that’s almost surely what happened.
The bigger issue is that Google IS scanning this stuff. This isn’t proof of anything going on with Google Translate, it’s proof that nothing on-line slips by Google’s gaze – and that’s far scarier.