Cutting spending in a time of a major economic contraction worked so well in the ’30s that we just have to do it again.
We Robot 2021: Sept 21-23
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Comments
- Michael Froomkin on Intellectual Cicada? Or, the WSJ Returns to the Theme that Law School Tuition is Too Damn High
- CRV on Intellectual Cicada? Or, the WSJ Returns to the Theme that Law School Tuition is Too Damn High
- Michael Froomkin on Intellectual Cicada? Or, the WSJ Returns to the Theme that Law School Tuition is Too Damn High
- Eric on Intellectual Cicada? Or, the WSJ Returns to the Theme that Law School Tuition is Too Damn High
- CRV on Intellectual Cicada? Or, the WSJ Returns to the Theme that Law School Tuition is Too Damn High
Subscribe to Blog via Email
I agree this deal is terrible. It does nothing to reign in favored special interests, take a look at point 2, “[the deal]….. is designed to protect crucial investments like aid for college students;” If there is one thing I know the government wastes money on it is student aid. It just allows law schools to charge more without any additional benefits to students, the government or society.
Then you will be pleased to learn that the program at issue was Pell Grants, and Pell Grants are only available to undergraduates (and some post-grad teacher certificate students).