Larry Lessig has Judge Richard Posner guest blogging for him next week.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- Published a blog post about how I got my congressperson to convince SFO to change their illegal mandatory biometrics collection blog.yomna.net/opting-out-o... April 14, 2026 yomna
- I gather it might be several weeks before the Hungarian election is officially certified, and the Parliament can meet to elect a new Prime Minister. Plenty of time for mischief if the outgoing crew is so minded. April 13, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Jotwell TechLaw: Tal Zarsky, Hailing a Fleeting Moment – On Regulating Autonomous Taxi Fleets, JOTWELL (Apr 13, 2026) (re: Bryant Walker Smith & Matthew T. Wansley, Regulating Robotaxis, 99 So. Cal. L. Rev. __(forthcoming 2026), available at SSRN (Oct. 12, 2025)), cyber.jotwell.com/hailing-a-fl.... April 13, 2026 Jotwell
- I am very proud and excited to share that a special issue of the Canadian Journal of Law and Technology featuring We Robot 2025 conference papers is now published and fully open access, with thanks to funding support from @windsorlaw.bsky.social: digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/cjlt/vol23/i... April 13, 2026 Kristen Thomasen
- That was a good estimate. April 13, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Recent Comments
- KK Ho on Introduction
- Michael on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Mulalira Faisal Umar on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Michael on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
- Just me on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 51 other subscribers
Yes, I will forever think of Lochner & Baby Selling in the context of Judge Posner.
I don’t know about this, I don’t think parental rights should be able to be sold, and disagree with Posner’s suggestion to reform adoption wholeheartedly, I think its a great example of how economists tend to lose touch with public sentiment in their quest for the right numbers. But still, the poor guy is going to be tagged with the word “baby-selling” forever, it just doesn’t seem fair. Granted, the article had been published before he was confirmed to the Court, but I don’t think advancing a theory should ever be grounds for permanent tarnishing of a person’s record. And you can’t get past a page one google search on any related topic without finding the words Posner and baby-selling in the same sentence…
But then, maybe I’m biased…because I’m as afraid of the majority in Lochner as Posner (or, i think, holmes) even on a good day.