Yearly Archives: 2003

Our Government’s Ceaseless Effort to Deny a Citizen Due Process Now Requires He Be Given A Lawyer

U.S. Allows Lawyer For Citizen Held as 'Enemy Combatant' (washingtonpost.com)
Don't celebrate. Our government's ceaseless campaign to uphold its power to incarcerate citizens without access to counsel or other basic rights required that Yaser Esam Hamdi be promised access to counsel — in order to keep the Supreme Court from finding he or others similarly situated in the future have a right to a lawyer:

In a brief statement, Defense Department officials said Hamdi would be allowed to see a lawyer “as a matter of discretion and military policy.” But the statement emphasized that the government did not feel obligated to make a lawyer available and that the decision “should not be treated as a precedent.”

See, it's all about making the next guy rot for months and years until his case gets to the Supreme Court. And maybe next time there won't be an amicus from a hundred big-name legal experts. And meanwhile, there's that really nifty Fourth Circuit decision saying the government can run a cooler camp for the unpersons formerly known as suspects.

Or, if you want the most pro-administration spin compatible with the facts, it's about grabbing carefully selected (of course!) folks off the street, putting them in solitary without charges, indefinitely, and squeezing them until they are dry. Then, if the government feels like it, the victim- -suspect former unperson “might be granted access to a lawyer once his value as an intelligence source ended, although [Deputy Solicitor General Paul D. Clement] said the decision should be up to the executive branch and not the courts.”

In other words, Rights? Fuggeddaboutit.

Continue reading

Posted in Civil Liberties | 2 Comments

Eszter Hargittai Asks About the Consequences of Courseware

The marvelous Eszter Hargittai askes an important question: what are the un(?)intended consequences of online courseware?

Continue reading

Posted in Software | Comments Off on Eszter Hargittai Asks About the Consequences of Courseware

New Feature: Links to Recent Comments

I've added links to the five most recent comments in the right margin. This was prompted by an interesting comment on a post that's a month old. Without something like this no one would ever see it.

Of course, even with something like this, almost no one will ever see it…

Requests, suggestions, brickbats, on this or any other layout issues….in the comments please.

Posted in Discourse.net | Comments Off on New Feature: Links to Recent Comments

Disposable Anonymous Mobile Telephones Come to the USA

They've had them in Europe for years. Several European police forces have tried to ban them on the grounds that it makes both retail and mass surveillance more difficult. And now it looks as if “they are finally coming to the USA.

Say hello to the disposal cell phone. Buy it for cash at retail, throw it away when you are done with it, and make calls that while not untraceable are certainly going to be much harder to link back to you. The phone of choice for the tourist, for the young and poor without credit histories, for when you need an extra phone because someone in the family is going out of town, but the tool also for every dissident and whistleblower, and perhaps for drug dealers too. Pity the web site gives no idea what they'll cost. And amusing that the web site markets the phones with a clip from CSI Miami in which the disposable phone “provided a crucial clue.”

No doubt we'll be hearing about attempts to ban these pretty soon.

Posted in Sufficiently Advanced Technology | 1 Comment

Blogshares Is Dead

I never did quite get around to figuring out the rules, but it was interesting to see who linked to me and watch my “valuation” gyrate (but generally rise) for no discernable reason. Now it's dead. BlogShares – Closed Down. I think I had a 'market share' of something just over .0065% towards the end there…

Continue reading

Posted in Blogs | Comments Off on Blogshares Is Dead

Colorado Supreme Court Strikes Down Mid-Decade Redistricting

Yahoo! News – Court Says Redistricting Unconstitutional

DENVER – In a decision that could have national implications, the Colorado Supreme Court threw out the state's new congressional districts Monday because the GOP-led Legislature redrew the maps in violation of the constitution.

The General Assembly is required to redraw the maps only after each census and before the ensuing general election — not at any other time, the court said in a closely watched decision. A similar court battle is being waged in Texas.

Under the ruling, Colorado's seven congressional districts revert to boundaries drawn up by a Denver judge last year after lawmakers failed to agree.

The issue before the court was whether the redistricting map pushed through the Legislature by Republicans this year was illegal. Colorado's constitution calls for redistricting only once a decade and Democrats contended the task was completed by the judge.

I look forward to reading this decision. I'm more than prepared to believe that there may be state Constitutional law issues here; but much as I think mid-term redistricting is despicable, it will take something substantial to convince me that there is a federal constitutional law violation here. (Although I can imagine what some of those arguments might look like.)

Continue reading

Posted in Law: Constitutional Law | Comments Off on Colorado Supreme Court Strikes Down Mid-Decade Redistricting