Category Archives: The Media

Press as Poodle

The title of the blog post is overwrought, The Next Hurrah: CBS Collaborates in Torture, but with cause.

According to Dan Rather's lawsuit against CBS, it didn't torture anyone — but CBS let the US government talk it into first squeltching and then toning down the story of the torture at Abu Ghraib.

Shameful if true. (And, while nothing is impossible, it's hard to see what Rather could possibly gain from making this up.) So much for the heirs of Murrow and Cronkite.

Bonus poodle example. And my apology to real poodles and their fans.

Posted in The Media, Torture | 2 Comments

Lots We Still Don’t Know About B-52 Live Nuclear Bomb Incident

I wrote the other day about the weird incident in which a B-52 flew over the US with five or six live nuclear bombs. (See My That’s a Big Sabre You Are Rattling There)

Strangely, the incident was mostly a one-day wonder to our press, which is now busy worrying about whatever it usually worries about — although you might think that misloading five (or was it six?) bombs — each ten times as destructive as the bomb the US dropped on Hiroshima — might just maybe spur a follow-up story or two.

That’s certainly what the good folks at Nieman Watchdog (where my brother is an editor) think, and I commend Nieman Watchdog > Ask This > A B-52 with six armed nuclear missiles flew over the U.S. for 3-1/2 hours. What’s the story here? to you for a recap of the facts as we know them. And it’s striking how little we know about certain key questions, which Nieman Watchdog thoughtfully provides for any reporter needing a little inspiration:

There are many questions the media should ask about this event. Without answers to them, no one can make positive recommendations for preventing such mishaps in the future.

Questions

Q. Why and for what ostensible purpose were these nuclear weapons taken to Barksdale AFB?

Q. How long was it before the error was discovered?

Q. How many mistakes and errors were made, and how many needed to be made, for this incident to happen. How many and which security protocols were overlooked and how many and which safety procedures were bypassed or ignored?

Q. How many other nuclear command and control non-observations of procedure have there been? Is there in the U.S. government a consolidated data base of such incidents so that they could be counted?  Who is responsible for such a data base?  A report for the Center for Defense Information some time ago said President Kennedy was told in 1961 that there had been 60 U.S. nuclear weapons accidents. How many nuclear mishaps have there been since 1961?

Q. What is the U.S. Congress going to do to better oversee U.S. nuclear command and control? Will there be an independent investigation of this mishap?

Q. How does this incident relate to concern for reliability of control over nuclear weapons and nuclear materials in Russia, Pakistan, and elsewhere.

Q. As some news reports suggest, does the Bush administration have plans to attack Iran with nuclear weapons? What does the U.S. Congress know about this, and have they even asked to be briefed?

The last question made me laugh.

Posted in The Media | 6 Comments

A Real Back-Handed Compliment

I can explain this.

You may think that this looks like media bias —

Crooks and Liars » Romney Fundraising Scandal Ignored By Liberal Media – Clinton Gets Hammered Over Hsu: In recent days, NBC, CNN, and Fox News have all aired reports or discussed the case of Norman Hsu, who The Wall Street Journal suggested may have funneled illegal campaign contributions to Sen. Hillary Clinton. However, when Mitt Romney’s national finance committee co-chairman Alan Fabian was charged with mail fraud, money laundering, bankruptcy fraud, perjury and obstruction of justice, the three networks did not report or discuss it during programs available in the Nexis database.

It looks like the media protect Republicans and go after Democrats, right? Well, that may be true of Fox News and the Wall Street Journal, but I have a different theory as to why the rest of the media falls into this pattern.

You see, it's not news when Republican officials are involved in sleazy financial deals. It is news when it happens to Democrats. After all, it happens to Republicans all the time and only happens to Democrats occasionally — despite the vast disparity in prosecutorial resources devoted to trying to find dirt on Democratic office-holders as opposed to that devoted investigating Republicans.

(And don't even get me started on the frequency of GOP sex scandals.)

Posted in Politics: The Party of Sleaze, The Media | Comments Off on A Real Back-Handed Compliment

Super-Snark

FDL indulges in some super-snark regarding the WSJ sale at Blue Monday at the WSJ:

meeting with Rupert Murdoch to discuss journalistic integrity strikes me as kind of like meeting with the polio virus to talk about Dr. Salk

Posted in The Media | Comments Off on Super-Snark

NYT Runs Correction on Gonzales Impeachment

I guess I should be grateful for minor victories. Today's NYT has this correction:

A news analysis article yesterday about the testimony of Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales before the Senate Judiciary Committee referred incorrectly to the power of Congress to remove an attorney general from office. Under the Constitution, civil officers of the United States government may be removed upon impeachment by the House of Representatives and trial in the Senate. Congress is not powerless to remove the attorney general.

Posted in The Media | 3 Comments

One More Update

Got a nice email from Sheryl Gay Stolberg acknowledging the error and saying she's asked for a correction to run.

Posted in The Media | Comments Off on One More Update