Category Archives: Law: Copyright and DMCA

The Sort of Expert You Want on Your Side

Speaking of Slashdot, it has a pointer to the sort of expert witness report that makes a litigator's heart (yes, they have them!) go pitter-pat. See Slashdot | RIAA Expert Witness Called “Borderline Incompetent” which will lead you to Prof. Johan Pouwelse of Delft University expert report relating to an allegation of copyright violations via P2P file sharing.

Posted in Law: Copyright and DMCA | Comments Off on The Sort of Expert You Want on Your Side

John Scalzi Can Rant

Science fiction writer John Scalzi knows how to write a rant. And what's better, he's on the right side of this one.

See A Gut Check Moment for SFWA for a classic example of the genre. And entertaining comments from a bevy of science fiction luminaries.

Posted in Law: Copyright and DMCA, Readings | Comments Off on John Scalzi Can Rant

90% of Statistics Are Wrong

It's rare you get quite as tidy an explanation of where a fake statistic came from as this, which comes from a bit of sleuthing by Prof. Michael Geist:

The RCMP has been the single most prominent source for claims about the impact of counterfeiting in Canada since its 2005 Economic Crime Report pegged the counterfeiting cost at between $10 to 30 billion dollars annually. The $30 billion figure has assumed a life of its own with groups lobbying for tougher anti-counterfeiting measures regularly raising it as evidence of the dire need for Canadian action. U.S. Ambassador to Canada David Wilkins cited the figure in a March 2007 speech critical of Canadian law, while the Canadian Anti-Counterfeiting Network, Canada's leading anti-counterfeiting lobby, reported in April that the “RCMP estimates that the cost to the Canadian economy from counterfeiting and piracy is in the billions.”

Yet despite the reliance on this figure – the Industry Committee referenced it in its final report – a closer examination reveals that the RCMP data is fatally flawed. Responding to an Access to Information Act request for the sources behind the $30 billion claim, Canada's national police force last week admitted that the figures were based on “open source documents found on the Internet.” In other words, the RCMP did not conduct any independent research on the scope or impact of counterfeiting in Canada, but rather merely searched for news stories on the Internet and then stood silent while lobby groups trumpeted the figure before Parliament.

A careful examination of the documents relied upon by the RCMP reveal two sources in particular that appear responsible for the $30 billion claim.

First, a March 2005 CTV news story reported unsubstantiated claims by the International Anti-Counterfeiting Coalition, a global anti-counterfeiting lobby group made up predominantly of brand owners and law firms, that some of its members believe that 20 percent of the Canadian market is “pirate product.” That 20 percent figure – raised without the support of any evidence whatsoever – appears to have been used by IACC to peg the cost of counterfeiting in Canada at $20 billion per year.

Second, a 2005 powerpoint presentation by Jayson Myers, then the Chief Economist for the Canadian Manufacturing and Exporters, included a single bullet point that “estimated direct losses in Canada between $20 billion and $30 billion annually.” The source for this claim? According to Mr. Myers, it is simply 3 to 4 percent of the value of Canada's two-way trade.

And, as Prof. Geist explains, other oft-cited measures of the loss due to 'piracy' are equally suspect.

Posted in Law: Copyright and DMCA | Comments Off on 90% of Statistics Are Wrong

Science Fiction Writers of America Caught in DMCA Abuse

Cory Doctorow is mad, and he has good reason: Science Fiction Writers of America abuses the DMCA.

You'd think they'd know better.

Posted in Law: Copyright and DMCA | 2 Comments

Ed Bott’s Contrarian View of Microsoft DRM

It's commonly believed that Vista's built-in DRM is a Bad Thing. I think it's bad because any time they put features in my machine that are meant to control me rather than letting me control the machine, I think the natural order of things is being undermined. Plus if the machine can do one thing I can't control, who says it can't be leveraged to do other nasty things to me?

It seems, though, that some people also blame Vista's DRM for other evils, including performance problems (I hadn't heard that). Ed Bott, who although he is a Microsoft fan in the way of a super-power user has in my experience always proved to be fair-minded, says it Ain't So:

Over the Christmas and New Year’s holidays at the end of last year and the beginning of this year, in between two-hour daily workouts with a snow shovel, I read a remarkable paper called A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection. And I wasn’t the only one. According to Technorati, the paper has so far been linked by more than 250 blogs, and Google News finds more than 100 citations to the paper in mainstream online publications.

Too bad it’s just so wrong about so many things.

In fact, I read the whole paper – all 10,224 words of it – seven times that week, and lost count of the number of exaggerations, half-truths, unsupported statements, and flat-out errors in it. It’s a big steaming pile of FUD, with just enough truth sprinkled on top to make it seem like there’s some substance underneath it.

I don't profess any expertise here, but it's interesting. There's more where that came from, and at Busting the FUD about Vista’s DRM.

Posted in Law: Copyright and DMCA, Software | Comments Off on Ed Bott’s Contrarian View of Microsoft DRM

SCO Loses Big in Its Unix Suit v. Novell

Via Groklaw,

Judge Dale Kimball has issued a 102-page ruling [PDF] on the numerous summary judgment motions in SCO v. Novell. Here it is as text. Here is what matters most:

[T]he court concludes that Novell is the owner of the UNIX and UnixWare Copyrights.

Looks like the long nightmare may be (almost) over.

Posted in Law: Copyright and DMCA | 8 Comments