Author Archives: Michael Froomkin

Declining Returns Seen in Academic Sector

In the course of justly reaming Thomas Friedman’s The World is Flat for the Journal of Economic Literature, Edward Leamer delivers himself of a throwaway remark on the declining returns from the academy and what that might teach about the open source movement,

We [academics] are part of a “Self-Organizing Collaborative Community” called the research universities of the United States and increasingly the rest of the world. Unlike contributors to Wikipedia and Linux, we get paid for our work, not by those who consume the fruits of our labor, but by taxpayers and by donors and by our students, all of whom we have convinced are better off by virtue of the research that we do. When it got started fifty years ago, this system worked great, but it isn’t working as well anymore. While we are doing plenty of worthwhile research we are also doing plenty that isn’t worthwhile, and the competition for research talent defined by the fads of the moment is driving up the cost of education to unaffordable levels. Adam Smith would have understood what’s wrong here. It takes sales for the invisible hand to do its magic. Begging in your work clothes when you aren’t working isn’t enough, even though the pastime may be lucrative. On the contrary, the more lucrative is the begging, the more likely is the conclusion that the work is worthwhile. But it takes accurate market prices to tell us what’s valuable and what’s not. Of course, good will and good intentions can carry a collaborative community productively for a while, but financial rewards relentlessly bend the system to their will, slowly perhaps, but inevitably. That’s the invisible hand at work. Thus, open-sourcing has the same problems and the same probable longevity as the communes of the 1960s — they worked great for a while, but the participants chose other ways to live once they got to know the people in the community.

Uncomfortable, but with a ring of truth.

Indeed, I think I heard one of the death-knells for the modern high-priced university this week. Increasingly, even reasonably well-off parents without pensions, people planning to retire off 401(k) plans, just don’t think they can afford it any more.

Incidentally, the entire Leamer review is great stuff and I recommend it.

Posted in Econ & Money | 1 Comment

Kaimipono Wenger Says I’m Nuts

Kaimipono Wenger starts the DSM for bloggers.

Given the number of people who have written to my ICANNWatch persona and been amazed to get an answer from the guy who writes Discourse.net, I guess at least one of the shoes fits…

Posted in Blogs | Comments Off on Kaimipono Wenger Says I’m Nuts

No Institution Left Behind

It’s amazing. This administration corrupts everything it touches — even librarians. And that’s saying a lot, because librarians have been in the forefront of fighting against many of the objectionable aspects of this governments’ information control policies. That’s why it’s such a shock to learn from The Project On Government Oversight (POGO) Blog that the National Archives Agreed to Coverup Reclassification Scheme:

The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) secretly agreed to hide from researchers attempts by intelligence and defense agencies to reclassify thousands of documents that had already been publicly released, some for as long as 50 years. Through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), the National Security Archive (the Archive) obtained a secret memorandum of understanding (MOU; pdf) between NARA, the Air Force, the Central Intelligence Agency and other intelligence agencies whose existence has been covered up through redactions.

The National Security Archive site’s explanation of what it discovered says that the program started four years ago, in 2002. The deal to which the Archives agreed could hardly be more explicit in its goals, among them “to avoid the attention and researcher complaints that may arise from removing material that has already been publicly available.”

I should note that although this agreement is dated 2002, the National Security Archive’s article suggests the reclassification program may have started “at the end of the Clinton administration” although I’m unclear on what they base that. Not that it matters; it’s wrong as a general matter.

I won’t go so far as to say that there are no circumstances in which an accidentally declassified document should be pulled from the shelves; I just think at most they’re very rare. And it’s evident that this program, which swept up thousands of documents, many of no possible national security value, was nowhere near reasonable.

Posted in Politics: The Party of Sleaze | 1 Comment

The Ultimate Meta-Thread

The ultimate meta-comment thread is at Unqualified Offerings.

I hope Jim Henley will forgive me for quoting the entire post. It consists of one word:

Blog

Hilarity ensues. Yes, really.

Posted in Blogs | Comments Off on The Ultimate Meta-Thread

The Joys (ahem) of Linux

I finally got around to putting SuSE on the blank partition on the family computer, the fastest machine in the house. Now Junior Junior has Ubuntu in his room, Junior Senior has SuSE (both on old PII/400s) in his room, the router turns off their Internet access at hours when we don’t want them online, and the family machine is dual-booting SuSE and XP. My desktop is next, but that will require repartitioning, which means some backing up first.

The basic SuSE install was painless, and while it’s a close call so far I think I like KDE better than Gnome.

Setting up printers was not anything close to painless. I have a Laserjet printer running off a network print server, and I took the default printer type SuSE offers, which was CUPS when (thank you Google and linux.org) what I should have done was specify it as an LPR printer. In my defense, I was fooled: As part of its default CUPS printer install SuSE tests to see if it can see a printer, and by giving it the IP number and the (non-standard) port I passed that test. It just flunked the actual printing thing. But it’s finally all sorted, and now Junior Senior’s machine can print to the LaserJet too. (In contrast, printing to the LaserJet from Ubuntu had been seamless and painless: it took about three minutes to set up.)

Getting 3D to run on the ATI Radeon x800 has been a different sort of adventure. Having carefully followed the directions I found online, I find that my own user has 3D, but the kids’ users do not. I can more or less overcome this by manually changing a 660 to a 666 in an obscure file, but often it changes itself back. I suppose I’ll have to figure out how to program SuSE to modify the file every time a user logs in. That will require the program to have superuser rights, which requires a password I am not giving my kids, so I have to find a way to do that which doesn’t expose the password either. It not that I don’t trust them, I just want my kids to hack into the guts of this machine rather than waltz into it. Why deny them the pleasures I had as a teenager?

We do have a second network printer, a very nice color printer, a handsome housewarming gift from my parents, one which has proved invaluable for homework projects. It seems, however, that SuSE isn’t going to be printing to the Canon iP5000 any time soon:

Dear Mr. Froomkin:

Thank you for contacting Canon product support regarding Linux drivers
for the iP5000. We value you as a Canon customer and appreciate the
opportunity to assist you.

While considering the desire to provide the best possible support for
Canon’s products, Canon must make decisions on which products to support
when new operating systems are introduced. Currently, Canon has decided
to support only the Microsoft Windows and the Macintosh operating
systems. We understand, and sincerely apologize for any frustration you
have experienced if your operating system falls outside of these
categories, but we hope that you understand our rationale.

Please let us know if we can be of any further assistance with your
iP5000.

Sincerely,

Raymond

Somehow, I bet it prints just fine from Ubuntu…

Posted in Software | 7 Comments

Dean Baker Wants Numerate Reporting

Economist and one-man economic truth squad Dean Baker has a new blog, Beat the Press, dedicated to “commentary on economic reporting.”

The inaugural posting asks, reasonably enough, why most economic journalism fails to put raw numbers in context, choosing to report the big exciting number of “$285 billion over the next six years” for the new transportation bill, rather then the more informative, contextualized number of “approximately 1.7 percent of projected federal spending over this period.”

In this case, though, it seems to me that this question actually answers itself: $285 billion sounds like a front-page headline; “approximately 1.7% of federal spending over the next six years” sounds like what William Safire used to call a “nine-point MEGO” where the MEGO stood for “my eyes glaze over” and the scale was logarithmic like the Richter scale.

And while I’m carping at my betters, let me point out that telling people that the new transportation bill will be 1.7% of federal spending or even “approximately 4.6 percent of projected discretionary spending” won’t tell most readers all that much either…unless you tell them how it compares to transportation spending last decade, whether it covers deferred maintenance, current expenditures or new capital projects, and what it does to the deficit… And your economic journalist has, what, fourteen column inches on a good day?

Posted in Econ & Money, The Media | Comments Off on Dean Baker Wants Numerate Reporting