Author Archives: Michael Froomkin

Say GoodBye To ‘The Economist’?

If I understand this post of Brad DeLong’s, a magazine I used to like but recently have had doubts about just slit its own wrists. Apparently, The Economist just appointed the guy who has been writing the Lexington column for the past few years to be the Editor in Chief. (I say apparently, because the entry for John Micklethwait at the Economist web site says he previously edited the US section of the newspaper which may or may not have included writing as Lexington.)

I’ve explained my problems with the modern Economist before (too little about Albania, too much that sounds like the GOP), but now I have to add that the Lexington column has for years, without exception, been the most pathetic part of the magazine. For years it has been the predictable and unoriginal regurgitation of the most pedestrian GOP talking points. Ken Mehlman with a very slight British accent. Appointing Lexington to run the thing would be so stupid that although I reluctantly renewed recently, I’d be tempted to ask for my money back.

Fortunately, this Penguin blurb says “Adrian Wooldridge writes its Lexington column”, although it’s undated. So maybe there’s still hope. Although if he was editing Lexington and didn’t recognize for the warmed over spin points that it was…

Posted in The Media | 3 Comments

Another Good Blog

I’m getting to the point where I fear more blogs to read. And Info/Law looks good, so it’s especially scary.

It’s about law and information (good stuff!), and it’s by Minnesota law-prof-to-be William McGeveran and Wayne State law-prof-to-be Derek Bambauer.

Posted in Blogs | Comments Off on Another Good Blog

‘Rumpole’ Finds a Cause

[Update (5/11): As noted by a commentator, Rumpole retracts!

THE FOLLOWING POST IS INCORRECT. RUMPOLE BLEW IT. SEE THE POST ON 511/06. JUDGE FARINA HAS NOT ORDERED ANY INTERPRETER NOT TO INTERPRET FOR A DEFENDANT’S FAMILY. SORRY. WE BLEW IT.

Maybe I should change the title to “Rumpole Loses a Cause”? (Although as the comments to the later story make clear, the incident really happened; seems it was just a misunderstanding of some kind.)]

“Rumpole” of the Justice Building Blog, now quite the talk of Miami-Dade litigators, has found a Cause, and it’s a good one:

JUSTICE BUILDING BLOG: NO HABLA INGLES….EVER

Here is the scene:
A lawyer is in court.
The Defendant is in custody.
There are sensitive plea negotiations at sidebar.
The case gets reset.
The defendant has to surrender his passport, pay a large fine and restitution before the case gets settled and he can get out of jail.
The new court date is two weeks away.

The interpreter does her job in court and on the way out the attorney wants to tell his client’s family the new court date and what needs to be done.

The attorney signals to the interpreter, who walks over and in Spanish asks the people if they are defendants.
They politely tell the interpreter that no, they are the family of the defendant who was just in court and they ask her what happened and when they have to be back in court.

The Interpreter reaches into her pocket, pulls out her reading glasses, clears her throat (ahhem) and loudly says for all to hear:

HEAR YE HEAR YE, BY ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DADE COUNTY, I CANNOT ANSWER ANY OF YOUR QUESTIONS.
FURTHERMORE, BY ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE, I CANNOT TRANSLATE ANY INSTRUCTIONS FROM YOUR ATTORNEY.
YOU MAY NOT BE TOLD THE NEXT COURT DATE.
YOU MAY NOT BE TOLD WHAT JUST HAPPENED.
WELCOME TO THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF DADE COUNTY.
I AM AUTHORIZED TO CONVEY TO YOU THAT THE CHIEF JUDGE, ON BEHALF OF ALL OF THE JUDGES OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT,
WISHES YOU A VERY NICE DAY.

This is not the rule elsewhere, not even in nearby Broward, which is not perhaps the watchword for sensitivity to non-English speakers and minorities. As Rumpole says, “WHEN BROWARD TAKES THE LEAD IN RACIAL OR ETHNIC SENSITIVITY, THEN YOU KNOW SOMETHING IS WRONG.”

Posted in Law: Practice, Miami | 4 Comments

Further Evidence that the Remake Is Usually a Mistake

Ann Bartow informs us that the classic Internet idiocy, the Hamster Dance had a so-called sequel, although it doesn’t advance the plot at all and sounds worse without being funny. And now it has a remake. OK, the remake is less bad than the sequel, and even has a funny bit, but even so, why bother?

Are there any remakes in any medium that improve on the originals? All I can think of off the top of my head is Civ II, which I prefer to think of as an upgrade, anyway. (And Civ III was worse…). Please note that I do not count as a remake an adaptation, say of a novel to film, which is a whole different nest of snakes.

The rule for sequels being worse than originals isn’t as absolute as the rule for remakes–especially in literature which has seen many fine series such as the Forsyth Saga and the Aubrey/Maturin books–but it’s pretty strong too, isn’t it?

Posted in Kultcha | 6 Comments

Photo Kremlinology

One thing that’s struck me about the NY Times for well over a decade is the extent to which they manipulate the sorts of photos they run of people. When they like someone, they run flattering pix; when they don’t like someone, they pick photos that make the person look bad. And there are so many ways to do it, too.

A particularly striking example of the genre appears on both the front page and page A18 of today’s paper, in which GOP Senate candidate Katherine Harris is portrayed as even dopier-looking than normal.


NYT Caption: Representatives Katherine Harris and Adam H. Putnam, both Florida Republicans, with Governor Bush at MacDill Air Force Base.

Admittedly, I too think she’s awful, but I’m sure that the paper wouldn’t permit such overt editorializing in a news story. And yes, I do get the argument that since the picture is factual, it actually happened, it’s not editorializing. I just don’t buy it.

Posted in The Media | 8 Comments

Advice for Those Seeking Academic Jobs

This USA Today article contains important advice for anyone seeking employment as a law teacher (or any other job, I’d imagine). CEOs (and, I can assure you, law faculties) believe that, “A person who is nice to you but rude to the waiter, or to others, is not a nice person.”

Indeed, I can think of one person who interviewed at UM some time in the last few years who I think might well have gotten a job offer back then but for the oft-repeated story of how s/he treated a waiter…

Posted in Law School | 3 Comments