Author Archives: Michael Froomkin

Some Thoughts on Law School Selection, With Particular Reference to Miami

A commentator in the “We'll Try Harder” thread, in which I noted with some pleasure that a magazine says UM is great for Hispanic students, throws down the gauntlet,

What are the top 10 Best Law Schools for Jews, michael? Asians? Whites? Show this troll that the legal community really does care about segregating minorities into “incubators” where they can really flourish. Surely you have some thoughts on which Law schools are best for particular minorities…please share!

Well, since you asked.

I don't think there's a simple answer to the question of what law school is best for everyone (unless it's “Yale”). Tastes and needs vary.

Urban/rural is a really important choice — where are you more comfortable? Do you need to be away from distractions?

Weather matters a lot to some people, especially those subject to Seasonal affective disorder. Geography also matters in the sense that all other things being equal, there's multiple advantages to going to a law school near where you'd like to work. (Learn the local folkways, meet local employers in social and legal events, easy to get to interviews especially with smaller firms that may not have a travel budget.)

Big/small — you can get lost in a big place unless you are a self-starter while small schools tend to do a better job of hand-holding, but big schools usually have a larger faculty and thus a richer curriculum.

Some schools — fewer than you'd guess from their ads — have specializations that may matter to your JD education.

And for some people the makeup of the student body and/or the sensitivity of the law school and/or surrounding community may matter. In that sense, Miami really does have a serious and relatively rare feature that may matter enormously to some potential students: this is a city that speaks Spanish as much as English — and more than English in some neighborhoods. (The effect is much less pronounced on campus, as we're fairly Anglo, but a lot of the staff and some of the students will speak Spanish to each other.) That may attract some people, and may put off others, but it is a real fact of life in this city. I would imagine that some bilingual students would find this very comfortable and even comforting; I would imagine that some Anglos unused to linguistic diversity might find it challenging. (Others, like me, find it charming and cosmopolitan.) But it is a real and relevant fact here and in that sense if no other makes this a welcoming place for Hispanic students. (There are, of course, other things too, such as our habit of teaching a few courses relating to civil law in Spanish, but that's another story.)

As for Jews, I'm no authority on the subject, but I think there's a spirit at Cardozo that you don't find many places. When I went there for an interview I felt at home right away in a way that I rarely encounter. It wasn't unique, but it was noticeable. I wasn't able to accept their job offer for geographic reasons, but I really liked the place. And it is nice to have a school that recognizes Jewish holidays. (UM does a tolerable job of accommodation, but it's not always built into the official calendar.) My kids' resolutely secular private school closes for major Jewish holidays, just as it does for major Christian ones, and I appreciate that.

As for whites, I would say the best schools are the ones that are not too dominated by whites. It's a diverse and complex world out there, boys and girls, and you better get used to it.

Posted in Law School | 3 Comments

Press as Poodle

The title of the blog post is overwrought, The Next Hurrah: CBS Collaborates in Torture, but with cause.

According to Dan Rather's lawsuit against CBS, it didn't torture anyone — but CBS let the US government talk it into first squeltching and then toning down the story of the torture at Abu Ghraib.

Shameful if true. (And, while nothing is impossible, it's hard to see what Rather could possibly gain from making this up.) So much for the heirs of Murrow and Cronkite.

Bonus poodle example. And my apology to real poodles and their fans.

Posted in The Media, Torture | 2 Comments

Krugman Blogs

Facts, what a concept.

The Straight and Not Narrow: It's quite strange how the magnitude of the Democratic victory has been downplayed. After the 1994 election, the cover of Time showed a charging elephant, and the headline read “GOP stampede.” Indeed, the GOP had won an impressive victory: in House races, Republicans had a 7 percentage point lead in the two-party vote.

In 2006, Time's cover was much more subdued; two overlapping circles, and the headline “The center is the new place to be.” You might assume that this was because the Democrats barely eked out a victory. In fact, Democrats had an 8.5 percentage point lead, substantially bigger than the GOP win in 1994. Also, the new Democratic majority in the House isn’t just larger than any the Republicans achieved over their 12-year reign; it’s much more solidly progressive than their pre-1994 majority.

Of course, given that the Dems continue to behave like a minority party in Congress….

Posted in Politics: US: 2006 Election | 1 Comment

Justice Delayed (and Covered Up)

Simple Justice Blog, Appeals Court Buries the Body So No One Knows, tells a strange and disturbing tale of NY state justice.

It features multiple carelessness and incompetence, an unethical prosecutor, a judge unworthy of the robe, and general callousness.

In the end, justice of a sort was done, and a mistaken conviction set aside … in a way that covered many tracks.

Every law student should read this — reality isn't quite like the textbooks.

Posted in Law: Ethics | 3 Comments

Wayne Slavin’s No-Good Horrible TSA Bad Day

Wayne Slavin, missed his trip to South Africa because the TSA (and hired airport security) acted really badly. (And Delta Airlines wasn't much help.)

The question is, does this mean that the TSA staff are regressing to the mean for people with guns and power treating the powerless (that is, you and me)?

It's not surprising that we are seeing the emergence of occasional airport petty tyrants. The sheer scale of the operation ensures there will be some. When TSA began, however, it was notable for the unusual courtesy with which the staff treated the passengers, especially as compared to their predecessor contract screener. Was that focus on decent interaction just the police equivalent of a credit card teaser rate, or the TSA ready to crack down on its bad apples?

History offers little ground for optimism here.

[Bonus TSA follies posting.]

Posted in Civil Liberties | 2 Comments

Drat.

I've been offered a chance to go to something really interesting far, far away at someone else's expense.

And it looks like I won't be able to do it: it's happening the same long weekend as the AALS hiring conference, and I'm married to the chair of our committee. She has to be there, so I have to be here — although our kids are amazingly large to look at, they're not big enough to be left alone for a night, much less for four days in a row.

Posted in Personal, Talks & Conferences | 4 Comments