Author Archives: Michael Froomkin

Safire In Outer Space

William Safire has a column which, even by the relaxed standard of his work in the last 12 months or so, is filled with Cheney-style delusion. Jack Balkan nails most of the big points, so I'll just add the one Jack missed.

It is beyond weird to suggest that Sec. Rumsfeld has at any relevant times been solicitous of the rights of detainees. The military tribunals he proposed were justly attacked by all and sundry as lacking almost all the elements of fairness and due process.

The extent to which these rules were deficient is highlighted by the recent announcement that the separate annual 'reviews' planned by Rumsfeld & Co. are now known to be seriously deficient.

Why Safire feels a need to repeatedly kow-tow to Rumsfled is mysterious. If it's for past favors they must be well past, since I can't think of a really good leak Safire's gotten recently. If it's a down payment for future favors, it better be a big one.

Posted in Guantanamo | 2 Comments

Even Spam Has A Use

If you want proof that every cloud has a silver lining, consider the use I have found for spam. I am now getting 2000+ spams per day, which is a major problem. But the good news is that when several hours go by and I have received no spam, I know my email is down again.

(Although it is up as I write this, back home and jet-lagged, my mail went down for hours at a time repeatedly while I was away.)

Incidentally, I have been forwarding all my mail to a gmail account in order to test its spam filtering capabilities. I have detected almost no false flagging of spam since the second day of use, which either shows gmail is doing something right, or my ability to scan spam for the real mail is withering as the quantity of spam increases and the real/fake ratio shrinks. Of the 2000+ spams I get, though, gmail is treating dozens a day as real mail. In other words, the false positive rate is better than the filters I wrote myself, but the 'failure to block rate' is about the same. I let through everything purporting to be from a UM account, which accounts for about half the spam I don't filter. I haven't figured out why gmail lets in what it does.

Removing spam via Gmail is still less annoying than on PINE, as you can easily mark many at a time for deletion from your inbox by clicking checkboxes. But I predict it will get harder to identify the spam once spammers adapt to gmail's showing you the first few words of text in list mode, and start putting more plausible text there.

Posted in Internet | 3 Comments

Annoying Filter Update

Since the supreme court cares about the quality of blocking and filtering software, it may be appropriate to report that SiteCoach, the blocking software used on the internet kiosks in the lobby of the Amsterdam hotel I am staying in blocks Atrios for using the f-word, and the Volokh Conspiracy for “Forbidden Keyword free sox”. Actually, the “o” in that last should be an “e”—I'd post it more clearely, but that would just ensure I couldnt access my own blog any more.

Posted in Law: Constitutional Law | 7 Comments

Iraq Coverup Unravels A Little More?

It has seemed very strange that Gen. Sanchez would be sent to 'get to the bottom' of the Iraq atrocities mess when he seemed implicated in them himself. Of course, if you want a cover-up, send the guy with a lot to hide. Now Brig. Gen. Janis Karpinski, not obviously the world's most disinterested source herself, fingers Sanchez, and maybe Rumsfeld, for ordering the use of dogs and other “types of coercive interrogation methods for detainees at Abu Ghraib'” like those that Gen. Sanchez approved for use on prisoners at Guantanamo Bay. Note also that “The Pentagon denied the assertion Thursday,” so this may be CYA by Karpinski…

Posted in Iraq Atrocities | 2 Comments

Gutless

Excuse me if I don't join the NYT editorial board in its cheers for the Senate's Vote to require the administration to account for all the prisoners it has captured abroad, and to turn over information about US military prisons to the Red Cross, and to comply with the Geneva conventions.

This cheering is wrong on multiple levels.

First, the Senate's action comes just a little late. The administration was able to invade Iraq because Congress didn't do its job in asking questions and holding it to account. And news about problems in the prisons is hardly new. There were rumors of trouble long before the infamous photos. One can argue about whether the legislature was on notice before they emerged. But there's no question that they have been on notice for weeks, yet this vote comes only in the shadow of the Supreme Court's reassertion of long-standing verities of separation of powers.

Notably, the Senate's resolution requires nothing significant beyond what likely would happen anyway as a result of the Supreme Court's recent decisions.

And, the Senate's action is limited to military prisons, leaving the CIA gulag in the shadows.

Last, but not least, Art. VI, Clause 2 of the US Constitution reads,

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

It shouldn't require legislative action to compel the President to take care that the “supreme Law of the Land” be observed, and indeed I wonder if it could be a bad precedent to even suggest in any way that but for legislative action the President ought to feel any freedom of action to unilaterally disregard fundamental norms of international law such as the Geneva conventions.

I'll cheer when the legislature starts investigating the CIA's network of interrogation camps. Does anyone ever get out alive?

Posted in Iraq Atrocities | 4 Comments

Distributed Bush Question Generation

My brother's washingtonpost.com – Live Online discussion yesterday includes some interesting suggestions from readers about what questions they would like the press to ask GW Bush. Another good example of harnessing the power of the 'net…except that I doubt somehow that many reporters have the guts to actually ask any of them.

Posted in Dan Froomkin, Politics: US | Comments Off on Distributed Bush Question Generation