Author Archives: Michael Froomkin

How to Question Bush Better

If you are willing to endure the annoying ad required for a 'Day Pass', you can read my brother's article at Salon, Mr. President, will you answer the question?. Here's the start:

George W. Bush has held far fewer solo news conferences than any president in the modern era. And when he does meet with the press, he avoids direct answers so brazenly that there is scant little value in it anyway. It's time the White House press corps did something about it.

How? In interviews, a half dozen of the best White House correspondents of the recent past have offered up some suggestions for the reporters who will be covering Bush's second term. And one place they can start is by reminding the public of a number of important, outstanding questions left unanswered about Bush's first term.

The article gives sober advice to White House journalists about how to try to shame the White House into less infrequent press conferences, and how to ask the sort of direct questions that are harder to fog out of.

I suspect, however, that the two things are in fact contradictory: if the press starts doing less of a lap-poodle act at press conferences, there are going to be fewer press conferences, not more.

But it's a nice article.

Posted in Dan Froomkin, Politics: US | 2 Comments

Mark Kleiman: J’Accuse

In Posted in Iraq Atrocities | 2 Comments

Can You Retire on One Meal Per Month?

Angry Bear has an interesting post on the further decline in the US savings rate (go read it) which contains this arresting statistic:

The personal saving rate fell to just 0.2% of after-tax income in October. That means that an average family that earns $75,000 per year, with take-home pay of about $5,000 per month, is saving about $10 per month. That's it.

Posted in Econ & Money | 1 Comment

Onion Previews New Iraq Terror Alert System

The Onion, America's Finest News Source™, previews Iraq's New Terror Alert System:

Posted in Completely Different | Comments Off on Onion Previews New Iraq Terror Alert System

Today’s Torture News

I hate having to write headlines like that one.

  • New York Times, Red Cross President Plans Visit to Washington on Question of Detainees' Treatment…showing how seriously the Red Cross takes the US's apparent non-compliance with basic human rights norms
  • Washington Post, U.S. Generals in Iraq Were Told of Abuse Early, Inquiry Finds: “A confidential report to Army generals in Iraq in December 2003 warned that members of an elite military and CIA task force were abusing detainees, a finding delivered more than a month before Army investigators received the photographs from Abu Ghraib prison that touched off investigations into prisoner mistreatment.”

    But did anyone do anything as a result of the report? We don't know:

    “Of the Herrington report, a Pentagon official said top generals in Iraq, including Lt. Gen. Ricardo S. Sanchez, who at the time directed U.S. forces there, reported the alleged abuses to officials at U.S. Central Command, which oversees military activities in the Middle East. The official said TF 121 was investigated, but he could not provide results.

    'The Herrington report was taken very seriously,' said the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the report has not been released.”

  • New York Times editorial, Abu Ghraib, Caribbean Style. Key quote:

    The White House, the Pentagon and the Justice Department clearly have no intention of addressing the abuse. Indeed, Mr. Bush has nominated one of the architects of the administration's prisoner policy, the White House counsel Alberto Gonzales, to be attorney general. The general who set up the system at Guantánamo is now in charge of prisons in Iraq.

    Only Congress can hold the administration accountable and begin to repair the damage to American values and America's image caused by the mistreatment of prisoners.

Have they gone mad in the White House or were they born that way?

Posted in Guantanamo, Iraq Atrocities | 3 Comments

TSA Is Losing Its Grip (Or Overusing It)

My personal experiences with TSA vary from great to OK, and tend to be much better than my often not real good experiences with private cops doing airport security.

It seems, though, that other people are having bad experiences and terrible experiences with the TSA at the airport. Add this to the new pro-groping policy (“I'm from the government and I'm here to feel you up”?), plans for nude screening and the scene is set for popular push back against this multi-multi-million dollar exercise in bolting barn doors long after the entire menagerie has bolted.

Posted in National Security | 2 Comments