A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- Good grief: Head of no-longer-relevant right-wing Manhattan Institute earns $800,000 per year. No wonder he's out to undermine Mamdani. www.nytimes.com/2026/07/29/n... August 9, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Facebook, ie Meta and Zuckerberg, bankrolling PACs in multiple states, including Florida, to support Republican state legislators who will be friendly to AI interests--like no regulation. Will the public learn of it and care? jasongarcia.substack.com/p/facebook-i... August 9, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Very poor message discipline, alas. August 9, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- "Shapiro for Governor" sent a fundraising email on the Sabbath, I complained on the Sabbath. August 8, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- I hesitate to call this a wrist slap for the officer who filed the misleading report, but if the glove fits... August 7, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Recent Comments
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 52 other subscribers
Categories
Listening
Follow
- Subscribe via RSS
- Comments RSS
© 2003-2024 A. Michael Froomkin. Unless otherwise stated, or copyright by others is indicated, textual content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States license. This permits non-profit reproduction so long as credit is given to the author and any resulting work is shared under the same or similar license. Links are appreciated. Library photo in header © 2008 Alex Nikada.
Jotwell- Gaming the Standard August 7, 2026 Christopher J. Robinette
- Strings Attached: Science Regulation by Science Funders August 6, 2026 Nicholson Price
- A Timely Reminder that Power Moves Even in the Mundane August 5, 2026 Lisa Owens
- Native Citizenship through a Different Lens August 4, 2026 Bethany Berger
- The End of Legal Scholarship? August 3, 2026 Eli Wald
- Responsiveness as a Constitutional Value July 31, 2026 Jaclyn Neo
Blenderlaw- eu commissioner didier reynders to visit miamilaw february 23, 2023 February 8, 2023
- a ukrainian student at miami law in her own words June 3, 2022
- canefunder for ukrainian students April 15, 2022
- george bermann on international arbitration and eu law February 25, 2022
- peter lederer August 10, 2021
- comments on carbon border tax proposals July 30, 2021
On the first article, one might note that they’re was no clear and present danger about having knives on planes (!) Before 9/11 either. In fact, I once had a United crew laugh at me because I reported that the guy across from me was carving fruit with a knife. Clear and present dangers are almost always in hindsight. That’s what makes the phrase so insidious in it’s usage. (And do you also support Reason’s stance on no masks for children?)
Your second citation is just a one paragraph opinion made by someone who knows advisory nothing about military retrograde motions. They’re was very clearly no cogent plan, and everybody knew the Afghan government would fall. It has already been collapsing all over the rest of the country for months. It’s the Afghan way. It’s the cultural way that tribal societies work and always have in that region. To say there was a great plan, but that it could not account for that obvious contingency is to admit that there was NO plan worth having.