A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- One of the best books I ever read. July 16, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Much (but not all) of what I teach changes quickly, e.g. AI law and these days Adlaw. For the other stuff I change things around. So I'm not on the whole that concerned about outlines. Maybe I'm deluding myself... July 16, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Jotwell Corporate: Sergio Alberto Gramitto Ricci, When Corporations Govern: Matteo Gatti’s Timely Framework for Understanding Corporate Power, JOTWELL (July 16, 2026) (reviewing Matteo Gatti, Corporate Power and the Politics of Change (2025)), corp.jotwell.com/when-corpora.... July 16, 2026 Jotwell
- Handwriting is a lost art in this age of keyboards. Plus what about dyslexic people like me who can't read their own writing? July 16, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Jotwell Contracts: Omri Ben-Shahar, How to Contract for Climate Preparedness?, JOTWELL (July 15, 2026), contracts.jotwell.com/how-to-contr.... 1/2 July 15, 2026 Jotwell
Recent Comments
- Emily Brown on Introduction
- KK Ho on Introduction
- Michael on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Mulalira Faisal Umar on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Michael on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 51 other subscribers
Categories
Listening
Follow
- Subscribe via RSS
- Comments RSS
© 2003-2024 A. Michael Froomkin. Unless otherwise stated, or copyright by others is indicated, textual content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States license. This permits non-profit reproduction so long as credit is given to the author and any resulting work is shared under the same or similar license. Links are appreciated. Library photo in header © 2008 Alex Nikada.
Jotwell- When Corporations Govern: Matteo Gatti’s Timely Framework for Understanding Corporate Power July 16, 2026 Sergio Alberto Gramitto Ricci
- How to Contract for Climate Preparedness? July 15, 2026 Omri Ben-Shahar
- Bentham on the Citizen’s Duty to Hold Political Authorities Accountable July 14, 2026 Thomas Bustamante
- The Administrative Law of the Civil Service July 13, 2026 Nicholas Parrillo
- An Honest Look at Police Union Contracts – Beat Them or Join Them? July 10, 2026 Michael C. Duff
- Empirical Insights into the Rural Estate Planning Crisis July 9, 2026 Reid Weisbord
Blenderlaw- eu commissioner didier reynders to visit miamilaw february 23, 2023 February 8, 2023
- a ukrainian student at miami law in her own words June 3, 2022
- canefunder for ukrainian students April 15, 2022
- george bermann on international arbitration and eu law February 25, 2022
- peter lederer August 10, 2021
- comments on carbon border tax proposals July 30, 2021
On the first article, one might note that they’re was no clear and present danger about having knives on planes (!) Before 9/11 either. In fact, I once had a United crew laugh at me because I reported that the guy across from me was carving fruit with a knife. Clear and present dangers are almost always in hindsight. That’s what makes the phrase so insidious in it’s usage. (And do you also support Reason’s stance on no masks for children?)
Your second citation is just a one paragraph opinion made by someone who knows advisory nothing about military retrograde motions. They’re was very clearly no cogent plan, and everybody knew the Afghan government would fall. It has already been collapsing all over the rest of the country for months. It’s the Afghan way. It’s the cultural way that tribal societies work and always have in that region. To say there was a great plan, but that it could not account for that obvious contingency is to admit that there was NO plan worth having.