Recent Bluessky Posts- We have an apparent cure for most people with pancreatic cancer—a profoundly swift, deadly cancer—and the position of the U.S. government is that it should be banned. This is real fall-of-empire stuff. April 19, 2026 Waldo Jaquith
- Further evidence that "Yes Minister" remains one of the best works of political science relating to the UK government, and probably all democratic governments. www.theguardian.com/politics/202... April 18, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- People are saying that if Trump's "Trumphial Arch" actually gets built then Democrats should plan to demolish it as soon as they can. I'm not sure I agree: rather than spend the money we should just rename it as the Monument to Stupidity. www.nytimes.com/2026/04/15/u... April 17, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Jotwell Worklaw: Michael Z. Green, Drilling Down on Anti-DEI Case Results, JOTWELL (April 17, 2026) (reviewing Michael Selmi, DEI and the Private Workplace, available at SSRN (September 11, 2025)), worklaw.jotwell.com/drilling-dow.... April 17, 2026 Jotwell
- Ugh. And I really liked the guy. April 17, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Monthly Archives: July 2019
Good Sound Bites
Posted in Politics: Impeachments
Comments Off on Good Sound Bites
Peek Behind the Curtain
Photo by Nick Lockey
Posted in AI
5 Comments
Video of Panel on “Regulating Safety and Quality” of Medical AI
Recently (June 1, 2019), I participated in a conference on AI & Medicine called Machine M.D. The organizers at the University of Ottawa have posted video from the event, so here’s Panel #1 on “Regulating Safety and Quality“. I was the first speaker, early in the morning…
Posted in AI, Talks & Conferences
Comments Off on Video of Panel on “Regulating Safety and Quality” of Medical AI
Note to Self: Enable DNS over HTTPS on Firefox
How to enable DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) in Firefox. Hope it plays nice with VPN…
Posted in Uncategorized
Comments Off on Note to Self: Enable DNS over HTTPS on Firefox
Almost as Good as ‘No Vehicles in the Park’
‘No Vehicles in the Park’ is the basis of one of the great teaching texts for jurisprudence. HLA Hart famously asked,
A legal rule forbids you to take a vehicle into the public park. Plainly this forbids an automobile, but what about bicycles, roller skates, toy automobiles? What about airplanes? Are these, as we say, to be called “vehicles” for the purpose of the rule or not?’
Believe me, any law professor can fill two hours running hypotheticals off this. There us even the occasional real-life case.
Comes now, however, the Nevada Highway Patrol, in the person of Nevada Highway Patrol Trooper Travis Smaka, who pulled over a vehicle in an HOV lane (not a park) that appeared to have only one occupant — only to be told by the driver that there was in fact another “occupant” in the vehicle: the corpse he was transporting. Trooper Smaka was unpersuaded, but he let the driver off with a warning. (See Police: No, a corpse doesn’t count toward the HOV lane passenger minimum for details.)
So, if the HOV rule is “minimum two occupants in the vehicle,” should a corpse count? Or, as my wife says, how about a pregnant woman in Alabama? If a fetus is a ‘person’ for manslaughter purposes, it is a person for HOV occupancy purposes? Or what about a telepresence robot being operated by some third party? Could that count?
Update: ‘Pearls Before Swine’ weighs in.
Posted in Legal Philosophy
Comments Off on Almost as Good as ‘No Vehicles in the Park’
