I’ve been tweaking my student legal writing tips again. Comments and suggestions for improvement are always welcomed.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- Interesting 🧵 August 13, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- We have such a great immigration clinic at @miamilawschool.bsky.social August 13, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- This is how you do it. August 12, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- “The Vesting Clauses Are Not Law” (forthcoming 2026 in the Iowa Law Review) argues that it is a mistake to read the Constitution’s Vesting Clauses as sources of substantive law. Doing so produces either a contradiction in the Constitution’s text or implications that are not palatable for formalists. August 12, 2026 David Froomkin
- Yikes! Chemical testing reveals that lots of household and personal care products, including many so-called organic ones, contain undisclosed and sometimes toxic chemicals. But where is the actual list of products with secret chemicals? pubs.acs.org/ehnea2/artic... August 12, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Recent Comments
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 52 other subscribers
Re your style & mechanics tip #6 – Always be specific. Instead of “in recent years” try, “since 1980.” – that’s actually really important because you have no idea when the reader will encounter the work. I mean, you do hope people will still be reading your work 20-50 years hence, right?
wg
Actually, that’s not the reason. Because even “since 1980” will requires a reader to know when the article was written, in that one can’t necessarily count on it still being true, and certainly the author’s representation as to its continuing truth can’t carry forward past publication (e.g. “since 1980 the Supreme Court has never….”).
The reason for my saying it partly to encourage precision in general rather than the natural student (human) tendency to waffle, but mostly to force the student writer to check exactly when it began, rather than settling for a guess or a memory. Lawyers can’t afford that since neither is always right.