I’ve been tweaking my student legal writing tips again. Comments and suggestions for improvement are always welcomed.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- Jotwell Courtslaw: Suzette M. Malveaux, Resilience and Judicial Power in the Aftermath of Trump v. CASA, JOTWELL (May 18, 2026) (reviewing Mila Sohoni, In CASA You Missed It, 78 Stan. L. Rev. ___ (forthcoming 2026), available at SSRN (Nov. 25, 2025)), courtslaw.jotwell.com/resilience-a.... May 18, 2026 Jotwell
- According to the Princeton Review, UMiami Law is the nation's #2 most diverse law faculty. www.princetonreview.com/law-school-r... Surprised to learn this, as it's not how we see ourselves. And it kinda makes me worry about the rest of legal academia.... May 17, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- This is a very silly list as proved by Invisible Cities being number 97 instead of being in the top 10. www.theguardian.com/books/ng-int... May 17, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Jotwell Adlaw: Emily Hammond, Putting a Human Face on Administrative Law, JOTWELL (May 15, 2026) (reviewing Matthew B. Lawrence, Second-Class Administrative Law: Lincoln v. Vigil’s Puzzling Presumption of Unreviewability, 101 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1029 (2024)), adlaw.jotwell.com/putting-a-hu.... May 15, 2026 Jotwell
- I want some to have around just in case. May 14, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Recent Comments
- KK Ho on Introduction
- Michael on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Mulalira Faisal Umar on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Michael on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
- Just me on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 51 other subscribers
Re your style & mechanics tip #6 – Always be specific. Instead of “in recent years” try, “since 1980.” – that’s actually really important because you have no idea when the reader will encounter the work. I mean, you do hope people will still be reading your work 20-50 years hence, right?
wg
Actually, that’s not the reason. Because even “since 1980” will requires a reader to know when the article was written, in that one can’t necessarily count on it still being true, and certainly the author’s representation as to its continuing truth can’t carry forward past publication (e.g. “since 1980 the Supreme Court has never….”).
The reason for my saying it partly to encourage precision in general rather than the natural student (human) tendency to waffle, but mostly to force the student writer to check exactly when it began, rather than settling for a guess or a memory. Lawyers can’t afford that since neither is always right.