I’ve been tweaking my student legal writing tips again. Comments and suggestions for improvement are always welcomed.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- How can the people in charge of all this cruelty live with themselves? www.miamiherald.com/news/local/i... September 21, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Liar vs Liar September 21, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- "Major television networks agreed to suspend their pooled coverage of the president on Monday as CNN, MS NOW and Politico filed a legal challenge against President Trump’s order barring them from the White House grounds." Didn't think they had it in them. Gift link: www.nytimes.com/live/2026/09... September 21, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Jotwell T&E: Adam Hirsch, Muddled Charity Law, JOTWELL (September 21, 2026) (reviewing Nancy A. McLaughlin, Donor Standing to Enforce Charitable Gifts in the 21st Century, 60 Real Prop. Tr. & Est. L.J. 207 (2025)), trustest.jotwell.com/muddled-char.... September 21, 2026 Jotwell
- Keeping in mind official costs usually understate long term effects on wounded veterans and many other things, this still equals over $325 per US household. And counting. www.nytimes.com/2026/09/18/u... Cf Edwin Starr, youtu.be/3Y3y5BSBtQA?... September 20, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Recent Comments
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 53 other subscribers
Re your style & mechanics tip #6 – Always be specific. Instead of “in recent years” try, “since 1980.” – that’s actually really important because you have no idea when the reader will encounter the work. I mean, you do hope people will still be reading your work 20-50 years hence, right?
wg
Actually, that’s not the reason. Because even “since 1980” will requires a reader to know when the article was written, in that one can’t necessarily count on it still being true, and certainly the author’s representation as to its continuing truth can’t carry forward past publication (e.g. “since 1980 the Supreme Court has never….”).
The reason for my saying it partly to encourage precision in general rather than the natural student (human) tendency to waffle, but mostly to force the student writer to check exactly when it began, rather than settling for a guess or a memory. Lawyers can’t afford that since neither is always right.