I’ve been tweaking my student legal writing tips again. Comments and suggestions for improvement are always welcomed.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- I wanted to insert a Chinese laundry joke here, but could not find one that was both funny and not at least mildly offensive. February 6, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Jotwell Property: Shelby D. Green, Infusing an Ethic of Place into the Water, JOTWELL (February 6, 2026) (reviewing Jason Anthony Robison, Equity Along The Yellowstone, 96 Colo. L. Rev. 601 (2025)), property.jotwell.com/infusing-an-.... February 6, 2026 Jotwell
- Every media outlet needs one of these. February 6, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Seems Donald Trump wants his name on everything, including Dulles airport and Penn station in New York. To feed Trump's ego, I propose cities around the country should start naming public works after him, and should use Danbury's honor of John Oliver as a model. youtu.be/emR3SvmCp04?... February 6, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Well that certainly should encourage quality hires. NB it doesn't yet include the flagship. February 5, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Recent Comments
- Michael on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Mulalira Faisal Umar on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Michael on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
- Just me on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
- Jennifer Cummings on Are Coral Gables Police Cooperating with ICE?
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 51 other subscribers
Re your style & mechanics tip #6 – Always be specific. Instead of “in recent years” try, “since 1980.” – that’s actually really important because you have no idea when the reader will encounter the work. I mean, you do hope people will still be reading your work 20-50 years hence, right?
wg
Actually, that’s not the reason. Because even “since 1980” will requires a reader to know when the article was written, in that one can’t necessarily count on it still being true, and certainly the author’s representation as to its continuing truth can’t carry forward past publication (e.g. “since 1980 the Supreme Court has never….”).
The reason for my saying it partly to encourage precision in general rather than the natural student (human) tendency to waffle, but mostly to force the student writer to check exactly when it began, rather than settling for a guess or a memory. Lawyers can’t afford that since neither is always right.