GOP Frontrunner Outraged Over Claims That He Wasn’t A Violent Psychopath.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- If it helps they said the same stuff 20 years ago in similar circumstances. You should ask if senders will get a bounce message. If not that's something to pursue because something is rotten somewhere. Or you have an Exchange server, which is almost the same thing.... September 2, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Chaos unfolds at the Miami immigration court after judges are assigned mega master calendars, hearings where judges see more than 100 immigrants at once. n.pr/4xnTBS9 September 2, 2026 NPR
- Jotwell Courtslaw: Sergio J. Campos, Learning from Others: Summary Judgment in Canada, JOTWELL (Sept. 2, 2026), courtslaw.jotwell.com/summary-judg.... September 2, 2026 Jotwell
- I knew standards had slipped badly in the Justice Department, and can understand how someone might say that AG Todd Blanche was prostituting the office to Trump, but an AUSA engaging in *actual prostitution*??? September 2, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Yale goes into aggressive suppression mode, bans reporters from campus in hope of stopping coverage of student protest against bending the knee to Trump. Have they not heard of the Streisand Effect? September 2, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Recent Comments
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 53 other subscribers
I’m no fan of Carson (and I think he has ZERO chance of nomination), but he DOES raise a valid point (which may be true, or may be false in the end) that (he claims) the 8 or 9 people that they talked to about this from his childhood were not in a position to know about these incidents one way or the other. And he says that the relative, which was the focus of one incident of rage, was asked by Carson and did not consent to have his name revealed by Carson to verify his claims.
Now this all may be true or false, BUT I’d say he raises a completely valid point here. I know that if you were looking to document MY past, you would A). have a hard time finding anyone that knew me in any depth, while knowing me casually, and B). have a hard time finding anyone who knew me well for longer than a few years. You could find lots of people to ask about me, but you’d really only get consistently good detail from a very small handful of people. My wife is probably the ONLY person who could tell you anything accurate about both today and 20 years ago. My friends would be hit and miss on specifics. Maybe your life is more open. Mine’s not at all. People vary. So I don’t find Carson’s rebuttal all that strange.