GOP Frontrunner Outraged Over Claims That He Wasn’t A Violent Psychopath.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- Jotwell Contracts: Cathy Hwang, What M&A Contracts Reveal about Corporate Stakeholder Commitments, JOTWELL (April 21, 2026) (reviewing Caley Petrucci, Corporate Goodwill, 67 B. C. L. Rev. 585 (2026)), contracts.jotwell.com/what-ma-cont.... April 21, 2026 Jotwell
- The most recent incremental contribution to the seizure of the power of the purse is the payment of DHS employees despite no budget law allowing such spending of the public money: www.cbsnews.com/news/dhs-shu... April 20, 2026 Kevin Elliott
- Jotwell Adlaw: Jack Beermann, Ultra Vires Review in Administrative Law for Dummies, JOTWELL (April 20, 2026) (reviewing Richard W. Murphy, Ultra Vires Review of Federal Agency Action Made Simple(r), 2025 Utah L. Rev. 1201 (2025)), adlaw.jotwell.com/ultra-vires-.... April 20, 2026 Jotwell
- "Triumph of Stupidity" April 20, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- This is just to say I have let in the duck that was on the doorstep and which you were probably hoping would stay out Forgive me he was persuasive so scary and so loud. April 19, 2026 Sarah Pinsker
Recent Comments
- KK Ho on Introduction
- Michael on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Mulalira Faisal Umar on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Michael on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
- Just me on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 51 other subscribers
I’m no fan of Carson (and I think he has ZERO chance of nomination), but he DOES raise a valid point (which may be true, or may be false in the end) that (he claims) the 8 or 9 people that they talked to about this from his childhood were not in a position to know about these incidents one way or the other. And he says that the relative, which was the focus of one incident of rage, was asked by Carson and did not consent to have his name revealed by Carson to verify his claims.
Now this all may be true or false, BUT I’d say he raises a completely valid point here. I know that if you were looking to document MY past, you would A). have a hard time finding anyone that knew me in any depth, while knowing me casually, and B). have a hard time finding anyone who knew me well for longer than a few years. You could find lots of people to ask about me, but you’d really only get consistently good detail from a very small handful of people. My wife is probably the ONLY person who could tell you anything accurate about both today and 20 years ago. My friends would be hit and miss on specifics. Maybe your life is more open. Mine’s not at all. People vary. So I don’t find Carson’s rebuttal all that strange.