A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- Liar vs Liar September 21, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- "Major television networks agreed to suspend their pooled coverage of the president on Monday as CNN, MS NOW and Politico filed a legal challenge against President Trump’s order barring them from the White House grounds." Didn't think they had it in them. Gift link: www.nytimes.com/live/2026/09... September 21, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Jotwell T&E: Adam Hirsch, Muddled Charity Law, JOTWELL (September 21, 2026) (reviewing Nancy A. McLaughlin, Donor Standing to Enforce Charitable Gifts in the 21st Century, 60 Real Prop. Tr. & Est. L.J. 207 (2025)), trustest.jotwell.com/muddled-char.... September 21, 2026 Jotwell
- Keeping in mind official costs usually understate long term effects on wounded veterans and many other things, this still equals over $325 per US household. And counting. www.nytimes.com/2026/09/18/u... Cf Edwin Starr, youtu.be/3Y3y5BSBtQA?... September 20, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- And local can be country then city so really 4 sometimes. September 19, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Recent Comments
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 53 other subscribers
Categories
Listening
Follow
- Subscribe via RSS
- Comments RSS
© 2003-2024 A. Michael Froomkin. Unless otherwise stated, or copyright by others is indicated, textual content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States license. This permits non-profit reproduction so long as credit is given to the author and any resulting work is shared under the same or similar license. Links are appreciated. Library photo in header © 2008 Alex Nikada.
Jotwell- Assessing DEI-Related Risk – and Reward – in the Corporate Boardroom September 22, 2026 Deborah Widiss
- Muddled Charity Law September 21, 2026 Adam Hirsch
- Different Kinds of Differences in Kind September 18, 2026 Rebecca Crootof
- Could Tax Unit Reform Improve Labor Supply, Raise Revenue, and Increase Welfare? Yes, Say Macro-Economists! September 17, 2026 Emily Satterthwaite
- Architecture Reveals Property’s Power September 16, 2026 P. T. Babie
- Ambiguity and Judicial Power on the Roberts Court September 15, 2026 Anita Krishnakumar
Blenderlaw- eu commissioner didier reynders to visit miamilaw february 23, 2023 February 8, 2023
- a ukrainian student at miami law in her own words June 3, 2022
- canefunder for ukrainian students April 15, 2022
- george bermann on international arbitration and eu law February 25, 2022
- peter lederer August 10, 2021
- comments on carbon border tax proposals July 30, 2021
Why do their privacy checkups involve me supplying cell phone numbers and alternate emails? Google is perhaps the biggest invader of privacy the world has ever seen, and they carry their banners stating everything we do is for the benefit of the world and internet users. Oh, and we also show some unobtrusive ads. That will follow you across every website you will visit for the next several months.
But no, let’s show a little kitten picture and do a “privacy checkup”.
/rant
I know they don’t show kitten pictures, but they use the verbal equivalent.
Google and privacy make for a monster oxymoron!