Please sign the petition at Joe Lieberman Must GO.
Richly deserved.
Please sign the petition at Joe Lieberman Must GO.
Richly deserved.
Is it just me, or does it seem that everyone — co-workers, the radio, the print media — is still taking a quiet mental victory lap?
I got a new cell phone a little while ago, because my old one just plain died after five years of abuse. The new one allows me to download .mp3 snippets as ringtones, and I've had some fun playing with it and putting in custom tones for the people who tend to call me. My wife gets the Monty Python Theme song (aka The Liberty Bell March), because she likes it.
Since I got the new phone, I've been using a “yes we can” audio clip as my default ringtone. (You can hear the part I use from the latter part of this video.) I got the idea from reading about South American electoral campaigns, in which I gather it is common for campaigns to produce ringtones and for supporters to use them. If nothing else, “yes we can” got a lot of knowing laughs.
But in my mind that was always a pre-election ringtone. Now I need something more permanent, or at least different. Ideally, I'd like something mixing the optimistic and the cautious, probably political, but more appropriate for the next months, a period in which the poetry of campaigning ripens into to the prose of governance. The ideal song would not be too obnoxious to others, and would sound nice to me, lend itself to excerpting, and no doubt meet many other criteria I'm too tired today to formulate.
Got any suggestions?
Note: I have never ever liked the sound of Happy Days Are Here Again. That is Not An Option. I also rejected these stanzas from Talking Heads' Don't Worry About the Government because, much as I like the song, it's too jangly for a ringtone I'll hear over and over.
That song, incidentally, has always meant “Rosslyn, Va” to me for no obvious reason except it seems to fit….
If your newspaper, like mine, decided not to run today's Doonesbury, here's a link to today's strip. Many papers failed to carry the strip because it predicted an Obama victory in a part of the paper that went to bed before the results could be known.
I don't mind so much the Miami Herald being a coward and making the fundamentally silly choice of substituting a re-run or an old strip instead — it's failing to acknowledge what they were doing by, say, tacking on a little note that I think is pretty bad…
Then again, this sort of gutlessness (managed to make it to the end of a Myriam Marquez column yet? Don't you miss Jim DeFede and Ana Menendez?) is one more reason why the Herald seems less and less necessary.
Only 43 years after the passage of the Voting Rights Act, the United States has elected a black man as President.
As is often the case for a trail-blazer, he had to be twice as good as the other candidate for the job.
Progressive candidates also won a number of important victories around the country — they did not sweep the table, and did particularly poorly in South Florida, but won enough nationwide to claim a substantial mandate nonetheless.
I would take even more pleasure from all this were it not tempered by the enshrinement in law of a different bigotry: although not all the votes are counted it seems that Amendment 2 passed in Florida, with more than 62% of the vote (60% was required); similarly, California's Proposition 8 seems to have passed narrowly also. Enshrining discrimination in state constitutions is not what makes a country great.
We will come to regret these votes, and to see them as the same sort of stain as we now know Jim Crow to have been. The only question is when.