Media bias is real and pervasive. Here's a great example: McCain compounds al Qaeda gaffe by repeating for a fourth time. Does this become a big story? Is it looped on TV? Does it get half the attention something a friend of Obama's said? Nope. Nope. And nope.
We Robot 2021: Sept 21-23
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Comments
- Vic on UMiami Confronts Legacy of Two Buildings (But Not a Street) Named After Racists
- Michael Froomkin on UMiami Confronts Legacy of Two Buildings (But Not a Street) Named After Racists
- Vic on UMiami Confronts Legacy of Two Buildings (But Not a Street) Named After Racists
- Eric on UMiami Confronts Legacy of Two Buildings (But Not a Street) Named After Racists
- Michael Froomkin on UMiami Confronts Legacy of Two Buildings (But Not a Street) Named After Racists
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Why should it command media attention? It obviously doesn’t fit the pre-determined narrative (McCain = war hero, maverick, and general all-around honest/plain-spoken politician), and is dangerously close to a substantive policy issue bearing directly on the national interest.
Not to mention that, after four times, this clearly isn’t a gaffe.