Soghoian's Law of Identity Theft Stupidity: Anyone who publishes their own private financial details in a public discussion of identity theft will eventually find that information used for fraud.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Comments
- Alfred Jackson on Putin Joke
- Ashley Jones on New Privacy Paper Posted
- And the Winner Is Boring – Discourse.netDiscourse.net on Yet Another Florida Voting Disaster
- Guilletmogomezvillafan on Brad DeLong Writes a Letter About a Suspected War Criminal on His Campus
- how long does payomatic transition take to adifferent bank - prohowquestion on Why Does It Take Two Days for an E-Payment to Move Between Two Big US Banks?
Subscribe to Blog via Email
There’s a detail mentioned in passing in these reports, which I’d like to know more about. It’s the comment by Clarkson that, “The bank cannot find out who did this because of the Data Protection Act and they cannot stop it from happening again.”
How does the Data Protection Act keep an investigation from happening? Is Clarkson wrong, or is that a law run amok?