Looks like Orin may have to wait for that beer: I'm not going to the AALS after all, but instead am at home, felled by some horrible stomach bug.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- My letter to Yale President McInnis about Yale reportedly in talks to 'bend the knee'. Text in the Alt. July 27, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Yup. I like to remove the middleman, but that usually takes me back to ActBlue.... July 27, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Four very similar texts in 24 hours claiming to be from Troy Jackson & asking for money. All from different phone numbers, so saying 'stop' to one doesn't stop the others. I don't usually block Dems as spam, even when they are randos far away I wouldn't give to, but I'm going to make an exception. July 26, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- "I didn't have time to write you a short letter, so I've written you a long one." -- Mark Twain July 26, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Interesting example of power of banking regs on international affairs. Banks want govt to protect them from money laundering & assisting terrorism claims. Israeli right wants to strangle Gaza. Israeli Banks Threaten to Cut Off Palestinian Economy, Deepening Crisis www.nytimes.com/2026/07/22/w... July 26, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Recent Comments
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 52 other subscribers
Sorry to hear about your stomach bug :-(. Unfortunately, it appears you have much worse problems in Florida right now.
If we believe Vanessa Blum’s January 3, 2008 report in the South Florida Sun-Sentinel, “Gag order raises questions in Liberty City terror retrial”, then U.S. District Judge Joan Lenard has lost her mind.
According to the article, Judge Lenard has decreed a “sweeping gag order”, which extends not only to the one defendant who was acquitted in the first trial, but also to his lawyers, and to his wife. From the article:
‘Tugging strongly against the First Amendment’ seems to be an early contender for understatement of the year. I’d put this the class of utterly unconstitutional. Manifestly unconstitional.
The judge’s supposed “need to damp down media coverage” does not justify a prior restraint against the never-charged wife of a now-acquitted person.
Judge Lenard has obviously lost her mind. If she doesn’t agree to resign voluntarily, then I think she needs to be impeached: The articles of impeachment should charge the common misdemeanor of lunacy.