Looks like Orin may have to wait for that beer: I'm not going to the AALS after all, but instead am at home, felled by some horrible stomach bug.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- Alas what pictures don't capture is the temperature. It will be great in winter though. August 16, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- So many fundraising texts begin, "You won't believe what" X said or did, followed by a URL promising to reveal whatever. Plonk. Either you think I'm a credulous idiot, or I indeed won't believe it, or I will, but in any case I'm not playing. August 15, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Jotwell.com :> August 15, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- What we need is trusted intermediaries to point out good stuff. August 14, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- It's funny how relatable small stuff, be it pen thieving, reflecting pool shenanigans, firing black seamstresses in order to hire sole source contractors for twice as much money, are the kind of details that stick in the public consciousness with any luck bring down much bigger crooks. Great ad BTW. August 14, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Recent Comments
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 53 other subscribers
Sorry to hear about your stomach bug :-(. Unfortunately, it appears you have much worse problems in Florida right now.
If we believe Vanessa Blum’s January 3, 2008 report in the South Florida Sun-Sentinel, “Gag order raises questions in Liberty City terror retrial”, then U.S. District Judge Joan Lenard has lost her mind.
According to the article, Judge Lenard has decreed a “sweeping gag order”, which extends not only to the one defendant who was acquitted in the first trial, but also to his lawyers, and to his wife. From the article:
‘Tugging strongly against the First Amendment’ seems to be an early contender for understatement of the year. I’d put this the class of utterly unconstitutional. Manifestly unconstitional.
The judge’s supposed “need to damp down media coverage” does not justify a prior restraint against the never-charged wife of a now-acquitted person.
Judge Lenard has obviously lost her mind. If she doesn’t agree to resign voluntarily, then I think she needs to be impeached: The articles of impeachment should charge the common misdemeanor of lunacy.