Looks like Orin may have to wait for that beer: I'm not going to the AALS after all, but instead am at home, felled by some horrible stomach bug.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- It is interesting how Rubio manages to be more despicable than Vance since Rubio has actual power to wield to do horrible things, but because Vance talks nasty and sneers he looks worse. September 6, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- New post September 5, 2026 Sandieglo
- NY Bar complaint filed against AG Todd Blanche for disobeying a court order in #Epstein files case. cmarmitage.substack.com/p/todd-blanc... September 4, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- My theory is different: every time Trump buys something, like a casino, he then loses money on it. So he thinks that buying foreign things causes us to lose money too September 4, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- And every time you think he can't possibly go lower.... you're wrong! September 4, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Recent Comments
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 53 other subscribers
Sorry to hear about your stomach bug :-(. Unfortunately, it appears you have much worse problems in Florida right now.
If we believe Vanessa Blum’s January 3, 2008 report in the South Florida Sun-Sentinel, “Gag order raises questions in Liberty City terror retrial”, then U.S. District Judge Joan Lenard has lost her mind.
According to the article, Judge Lenard has decreed a “sweeping gag order”, which extends not only to the one defendant who was acquitted in the first trial, but also to his lawyers, and to his wife. From the article:
‘Tugging strongly against the First Amendment’ seems to be an early contender for understatement of the year. I’d put this the class of utterly unconstitutional. Manifestly unconstitional.
The judge’s supposed “need to damp down media coverage” does not justify a prior restraint against the never-charged wife of a now-acquitted person.
Judge Lenard has obviously lost her mind. If she doesn’t agree to resign voluntarily, then I think she needs to be impeached: The articles of impeachment should charge the common misdemeanor of lunacy.