Ok, I think this guy is a little angry. And with good reason.
We Robot 2021: Sept 21-23
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Comments
- Michael Froomkin on Intellectual Cicada? Or, the WSJ Returns to the Theme that Law School Tuition is Too Damn High
- CRV on Intellectual Cicada? Or, the WSJ Returns to the Theme that Law School Tuition is Too Damn High
- Michael Froomkin on Intellectual Cicada? Or, the WSJ Returns to the Theme that Law School Tuition is Too Damn High
- Eric on Intellectual Cicada? Or, the WSJ Returns to the Theme that Law School Tuition is Too Damn High
- CRV on Intellectual Cicada? Or, the WSJ Returns to the Theme that Law School Tuition is Too Damn High
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Great piece, thanks for the link.
Angry? Ya think?
I gotta say I never ran across this crap when I was in the service–but that was long ago.
It really is offensive when groups of the faithful (of any denomination) – attempt to insinuate their beliefs into military or political culture by using scriptural terminology, holding impromptu prayer meetings, handing out leaflets etc. Strict rules need to be enforced to ensure it doesn’t happen. Religion should be a personal matter, especially in a pluralistic setting – out of respect for others if nothing else. A soldier or political rep can always go visit their pastor, or retire to their office/residence to pray alone or in the company of others – it should not be put on display.