U. Chicago Prof. Geoffrey Stone: ‘Senate Should Not Confirm Samuel Alito’

Geoffrey Stone, The University of Chicago Law School Faculty Blog: Why the Senate Should Not Confirm Samuel Alito:

Judge Alito is a smart, experienced, and knowledgeable jurist. I have no doubt of his legal ability. I do not share either his judicial philosophy (apparently a mixture of quasi-originalism and social conservatism) or his views about many issues likely to come before the Supreme Court (ranging from the right to privacy to federalism). In such circumstances, I ordinarily would support his confirmation. On balance, the Senate should give more weight to excellence than judicial philosophy, and that is why I endorsed the confirmation of John Roberts.

Whatever else Judge Alito may or may not have made clear about his views on such issues as abortion, federalism, and religious freedom, he has certainly made clear that he has no interest in restraining the acts of this commander-in-chief. That, in my judgment, poses a serious threat to the nation, and is a more than adequate reason for the Senate – Republicans and Democrats alike – to deny his confirmation to the Supreme Court of the United States.

Tell me again that this is a done deal?

This entry was posted in Law: The Supremes. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to U. Chicago Prof. Geoffrey Stone: ‘Senate Should Not Confirm Samuel Alito’

  1. Brad DeLong says:

    It’s a done deal. There aren’t seven Republican senators who believe enough in the Constitution–or even in congressional power–to vote against Alito. Hell, there aren’t even seven Republican senators who are willing to *say* they will vote for Alito but also be willing to back a filibuster when Cheney rules it out-of-order…

  2. sphinx says:

    Why are the dems willing to hand over our rights and freedoms to Dr. Strangelove? Will Bush be made Emperor with the Supreme Court’s blessing? Why no filibuster, dems? Huh?

  3. Ryan Walters says:

    Yes, that’s right sphinx, it’s THE DEMOCRATS’ fault that Alito’s going to be confirmed. How can they filibuster him when they’ve done such a crappy job of setting him up with the black hat?

  4. In the beginning, I decided to join the campaign to impeach your “smirking chimp”, my “dum’ass botch”. As evidence for that, you’ll soon be invited to click on a hyperlink.

    Before doing so, however, I would like you to read through the rest of this text. In case, you’d like to know, the U.R.L for your blog, specifically, “Discourse.net”, is found at the third hyperlink on the list below … ah, please remember, no clicking until AFTER reading the entire text.

    Perusing your blog, I believe I arrived at what is a reasonable inference. That is, both you and your readers would welcome news that indicates the campaign to impeach the president is increasing in both vigor and breadth. Ah, you’ll find that evidence by clicking on the second enclosed hyperlink.

    As for my game plan for capturing Osama, you’ll find it by clicking on the first listed hyperlink, which immediately follows this colon:




    .he who is known as sefton

    oh, yes, surely, you’ve heard about the government “requesting” certain records about internet activity. oh, br’dah! … cynical and skeptical lil’ole me, I’m smelling a rat in all that. Quite candidly, I have cause to suspect that more than compiling statistics on access to pornographic websites is involved.

    oh, yeah, right after Hitler came to power, the German people were assured that, if they were innocent of untoward activity, they would have nothing to worry about … yeah, right.

Comments are closed.