Although I rather doubt that the law professors’ letter had much to do with it, I’m pleased to learn that the Supreme Court has granted cert. in the Hamdan appeal.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- Interesting đź§µ August 13, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- We have such a great immigration clinic at @miamilawschool.bsky.social August 13, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- This is how you do it. August 12, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- “The Vesting Clauses Are Not Law” (forthcoming 2026 in the Iowa Law Review) argues that it is a mistake to read the Constitution’s Vesting Clauses as sources of substantive law. Doing so produces either a contradiction in the Constitution’s text or implications that are not palatable for formalists. August 12, 2026 David Froomkin
- Yikes! Chemical testing reveals that lots of household and personal care products, including many so-called organic ones, contain undisclosed and sometimes toxic chemicals. But where is the actual list of products with secret chemicals? pubs.acs.org/ehnea2/artic... August 12, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Recent Comments
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 52 other subscribers
A modest proposal for assuring the rights of detainess in the war on terror. See Innocent Until Proven Guilty
Yes, PBSWatcher, there is obviously no middle ground whatsoever between holding people forever without charge and immediate release. That’s why our Constitution didn’t include a Judicial Branch. It would have been pointless. Your sparkling analysis is much appreciated.
We don’t release them unconditionally. We make them promise to come back for their trials. Surely all the innocent ones will return and those are ones we are worried about.
Now, you’re not to go all guilty on us for maybe having abused your exorbitant influence as a Professor of Law to tip the balance, are you?