The Guardian reports that Ian MacDonald QC, one a relatively small number of British barristers allowed to represent suspected terror suspects before the UK Special Immigration Appeals Commission , has announced he will not longer take those cases following the House of Lords ruling that the detentions are illegal. The Guardian speculates that many, perhaps all, of the other barristers with similar status will follow suit, putting a real spanner in the works. Once again, the British lawyers are ahead of us.
Recent Bluessky Posts- Happy Bastille Day to those who celebrate it. Was always a special day in my house growing up. July 14, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Jotwell Jurisprudence: Thomas Bustamante, Bentham on the Citizen’s Duty to Hold Political Authorities Accountable, JOTWELL (July 14, 2026), juris.jotwell.com/bentham-on-t.... 1/2 July 14, 2026 Jotwell
- Thought I might mention that Judge Kathleen Williams, author of this very fine opinion on Trump's attempt at collusive litigation to get both a slush fund from the Treasury and a free pass from IRS, storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us..., is a graduate of the University of Miami School of Law. July 14, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Jotwell Adlaw: Nicholas Parrillo, The Administrative Law of the Civil Service, JOTWELL (July 13, 2026) (reviewing Nicholas Bednar, Presidential Control of the Civil Service, 110 Minn. L. Rev. 2065 (2026)), adlaw.jotwell.com/the-administ.... July 13, 2026 Jotwell
- I demand they send me $100,000 forthwith. If they can demand stuff with no legal basis, why can't I? July 10, 2026 Michael Froomkin
I don’t think this is productive. How on earth can you protest an illegal detention by refusing to represent the detainees?? Yea, I understand the whole principle of not participating in a corrupt system, but that’s like protesting the unavailability of cheap medical care by refusing to give bandages to people who are bleeding to death.
Reminds me of the Dutch Bulb Speculators.
Oh, bah! I meant to post that in the virtual property story.