Works for me: Jon Stewart For Debate Moderator.
We Robot 2021: Sept 21-23
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Comments
- Michael Froomkin on Intellectual Cicada? Or, the WSJ Returns to the Theme that Law School Tuition is Too Damn High
- CRV on Intellectual Cicada? Or, the WSJ Returns to the Theme that Law School Tuition is Too Damn High
- Michael Froomkin on Intellectual Cicada? Or, the WSJ Returns to the Theme that Law School Tuition is Too Damn High
- Eric on Intellectual Cicada? Or, the WSJ Returns to the Theme that Law School Tuition is Too Damn High
- CRV on Intellectual Cicada? Or, the WSJ Returns to the Theme that Law School Tuition is Too Damn High
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Pingback: Fables of the reconstruction
I agree wholeheartedly…the chief qualification for a moderator should be an inability to refrain from chuckling when appropriate, and Stewart’s the best at laughing at everyone in the wrong, regardless of party politics…if only GWB were more aware of the natural laugh track built into his speeches, who knows….
If nothing else, it would boost viewership. But I’d only support it if the debate ended with a “Back in Black” segment.
I hear ya, Mojo, but I doubt they could pull it off. I think Lewis Black is great, but if he listened to GWB in open debate his head would most likely explode before the second question.
—–