So, 
I'm reading the Financial Times's account of how the CIA is telling the Senate that Naming of agent 'was aimed at discrediting CIA' and idly wondering if it's a bad thing or a terrible thing when a banana republic's Great Power's clandestine services get into a war with the Junta Chief Executive, when I notice that the FT's computer has a couple of stories that it has identifed as related to the Bush administration's unprecedented betrayal of a clandestine CIA operative.
Click the thumbnail to see the apt headlines to the two links
