February 19, 2008

More on Wikileaks Case

Wikilleaks’s account of the correspondence between it and Bank Julius Bear. Notable in this account is the odd failure of the demand letter to say what documents they wanted taken down.

Copy of the motion for injunction filed by Julius Baer in California via TPM Muckraker.

Also, note that I fixed the link in my previous post to now point to a locally-hosted copy of the California gag order.


Posted by Michael : February 19, 2008 11:51 AM | Law: Free Speech | TechnoLinks
Slashdot   Slashdot It!
Comments

Thanks for fixing the link!

Also, the Citizen Media Law Project now has a page for Julius Baer Bank and Trust v. Wikileaks, with links to court documents.

Posted by: gary at February 19, 2008 12:48 PM

When Verio cancelled Cryptome's hosting account for breach of terms of service, the provider refused to specify what contractual terms had been violated. Perhaps they were backed into a corner by a national security letter...

Posted by: America Jones at February 19, 2008 03:24 PM

Interesting to compare this case with the LGT situation in Germany.

Posted by: Mojo at February 19, 2008 08:18 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?




Comments must be previewed once before posting (this discourages automated posting).


Did you happen to see these?
• Proposed Italian Law Would Effectively Shut Down Most Blogs - Mar 06, 2008
• Council of Europe Sips at the Censorship Kool-Aid - Mar 06, 2008
• Wikileaks: Julius Baer Bank and Trust Decides to Cut Its Losses - Mar 05, 2008


Add Discourse.net to your RSS/RDF/XML reader: Full feed

Powered by Movable Type 2.64.


   out of